Jump to content

Orioles Claim OF Adam Brett Walker (Claimed by Atlanta Braves)


weams

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

 

Whoever you send down creates a log jam somewhere. I'm really thinking the Orioles hope Pena and Joseph both do extremely well and they can flip one for something (obviously not much, but something.)

Back on topic...I'm unsure of this. If A.B.W. clears waivers and the Orioles send him to Norfolk, can they still bring him to the MLB camp as a non-roster invitee?

If he's still around he could be invited as a nonrosyer invitee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 hours ago, scOtt said:

 

 

I hope Pena does hit! I'd send optionable Caleb down to keep him. He looks like a damn good catcher imo. In charge of the game.

One thing I noticed about Pena -- he can't catch a foul tip!   Drove me nuts in the short time he was in Baltimore.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

I just don't see how McFarland makes the crowded pen and I believe he's out of options. With him being left handed and breathing someone will place a claim.

Shake a baseball tree and ten McFarlands fall out. He's a left-handed reliever who can't get lefties out consistently. He's an innings eater/mop up guy. Whether he's left-handed or not his stuff is just not good enough to be in any significant role in the major leagues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Shake a baseball tree and ten McFarland fall out. He's a left-handed reliever who can't get lefties out consistently. He's an innings eater/mop up guy. Whether he's left-handed or not his stuff is just not good enough to be in any significant role in the major leagues

I agree with you 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

One thing I noticed about Pena -- he can't catch a foul tip!   Drove me nuts in the short time he was in Baltimore.  

That sounds more like luck of the draw on a SSS than any definable lack of skill on Pena's part.  Sometimes the path of the ball is barely deflected at all and goes right to the pocket or webbing of the mitt, other times the bat gets a slightly larger piece of the ball and the path changes enough to make it hit the edge of the mitt in an uncatchable way.  (Is uncatchable a word?  :) )  There really is no adjustment time for a catcher to make a play.  It either hits the glove right or it doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm telling you, you guys are underestimating Mac.  I guess everyone has a "boy" they root for in ST.  Last year everyone was on Rickard.  I'm going with Mcfarland this year.  

His average FB velocity was up to a career high 91.8 in 2016, compared to 88.4 when he came to us in 2013.  

In April last year he had 12.2 IP, 0.973 WHIP, .505 OPS.  

Pitched 1 game for us in May.  Got lit up.  Then this...

"He'll be evaluated by team orthopedist Dr. Michael Jacobs. McFarland only expects to be out a few days but the Orioles still felt it necessary to give him an MRI. "Stay on the safe side, see what we're dealing with," said manager Buck Showalter. The Orioles optioned McFarland to Norfolk back on May 7."

Source: orioles.com

Sat, May 21, 2016 10:57:00 PM

He was never the same after that.  Cortisone injection.  We rushed him back.  Had him starting and then relieving in AAA. Rushed and bounced around.  Seems like after the injury he never got back on track because we were so desperate for pitching early last year.  He and Oliver Drake are two guys that we underrate here.  What's going to hurt the both of them is that they are out of options.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I'm telling you, you guys are underestimating Mac.  I guess everyone has a "boy" they root for in ST.  Last year everyone was on Rickard.  I'm going with Mcfarland this year.  

His average FB velocity was up to a career high 91.8 in 2016, compared to 88.4 when he came to us in 2013.  

In April last year he had 12.2 IP, 0.973 WHIP, .505 OPS.  

Pitched 1 game for us in May.  Got lit up.  Then this...

"He'll be evaluated by team orthopedist Dr. Michael Jacobs. McFarland only expects to be out a few days but the Orioles still felt it necessary to give him an MRI. "Stay on the safe side, see what we're dealing with," said manager Buck Showalter. The Orioles optioned McFarland to Norfolk back on May 7."

Source: orioles.com

Sat, May 21, 2016 10:57:00 PM

He was never the same after that.  Cortisone injection.  We rushed him back.  Had him starting and then relieving in AAA. Rushed and bounced around.  Seems like after the injury he never got back on track because we were so desperate for pitching early last year.  He and Oliver Drake are two guys that we underrate here.  What's going to hurt the both of them is that they are out of options.  

What's really going to hurt McFarland is that he averages 5.7 K/9 and 3.3 BB/9 in a league where relievers average 8.7 and 3.2.  And, not coincidentally, his ERA is about half a run worse than an average reliever.

When you strike out 5.3 per nine in AAA you're probably not a MLB pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

What's really going to hurt McFarland is that he averages 5.7 K/9 and 3.3 BB/9 in a league where relievers average 8.7 and 3.2.  And, not coincidentally, his ERA is about half a run worse than an average reliever.

When you strike out 5.3 per nine in AAA you're probably not a MLB pitcher.

Are those his numbers as a reliever, or his total numbers?  Also, do you know how his relief numbers compare to LH relievers?  I'd be more interested in those comparisons, if you have them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number5 said:

Are those his numbers as a reliever, or his total numbers?  Also, do you know how his relief numbers compare to LH relievers?  I'd be more interested in those comparisons, if you have them.

Career for MLB, AAA career for the 5.3 K/9.  I have no idea how that compares to LH relievers, but assume there isn't a great difference.  5ish K/9 hasn't been decent since the 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Career for MLB, AAA career for the 5.3 K/9.  I have no idea how that compares to LH relievers, but assume there isn't a great difference.  5ish K/9 hasn't been decent since the 80s.

Overall, batters strike out 21.0% of the time vs. RHP, 21.6% vs. LHP.   That's all pitchers, not relievers.    I'd think that if anything, the gap is a bit wider for relievers, because of the ability to match up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...