Jump to content

Would trading Mancini be the best option now?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, esmd said:

You probably have better info than I do.  Last I heard, they were trying to work a deal with Napoli.  If that was still the case, you could try to sell them, on Mancini as a younger, cheaper alternative that could potentially blossom into a nice player for them.

Either way, I agree they need to trade Mancini.  He's blocked here, so might as well move him for whatever they can get back.  I just hope they don't regret it if he turns into a good player for someone else.

I agree, Mancini is probably best served by being moved.

Texas has Beltre, who isn't going anyway and which is why they didn't spend the money on EE or Napoli.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That he's over 30 and has never been near that level before?  Also that 1.9 wins is not very good for someone with 667 PAs. Wieters and Hardy were worth about that in 2/3rds the playing time.

People keep throwing "career year" comments out there.  He has exceeded 2016's 1.6 WAR thrice before.  OPACY is the best hitter's park he has ever called home.  With Smith, Trumbo figures to not be in right field in two-thirds of the games - more if the Orioles bring someone else in to play RF vs. LHP.  His defense will not drag his WAR down nearly as much as it did last year.  WAR is also cumulative, so his 2015 season needs to have the WAR for each team added together.  It wasn't two 0.8 WAR seasons like some people are pretending here, it was one 1.6 WAR season split between two teams.  His loan season under 1.6 WAR, 2014, was an anomaly, as he missed almost half the season (played in 88 games).  The doom and gloom comments about Trumbo's prospects to succeed are very overstated, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number5 said:

People keep throwing "career year" comments out there.  He has exceeded 2016's 1.6 WAR thrice before.  OPACY is the best hitter's park he has ever called home.  With Smith, Trumbo figures to not be in right field in two-thirds of the games - more if the Orioles bring someone else in to play RF vs. LHP.  His defense will not drag his WAR down nearly as much as it did last year.  WAR is also cumulative, so his 2015 season needs to have the WAR for each team added together.  It wasn't two 0.8 WAR seasons like some people are pretending here, it was one 1.6 WAR season split between two teams.  His loan season under 1.6 WAR, 2014, was an anomaly, as he missed almost half the season (played in 88 games).  The doom and gloom comments about Trumbo's prospects to succeed are very overstated, IMO.

The defensive adjustment for DH is pretty harsh.  The comments about Trumbo putting up more wins this year because he won't be in RF are very overstated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArtVanDelay said:

The defensive adjustment for DH is pretty harsh.  The comments about Trumbo putting up more wins this year because he won't be in RF are very overstated. 

He would have been under 3 wins at first.  His offensive season wasn't that great. 

He just doesn't get on base enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best option for Mancini is to go to AAA and have a huge year and improve his defense at 1B.  His value to us is still much greater than we would get back in a trade.  Remember there is a 10 day DL now.  I could also see us not going with a rule 5 guy and instead having optionable guys as the 4th man on the bench.  Mancini could get called up just to match up vs tough LH SP's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number5 said:

People keep throwing "career year" comments out there.  He has exceeded 2016's 1.6 WAR thrice before.  OPACY is the best hitter's park he has ever called home.  With Smith, Trumbo figures to not be in right field in two-thirds of the games - more if the Orioles bring someone else in to play RF vs. LHP.  His defense will not drag his WAR down nearly as much as it did last year.  WAR is also cumulative, so his 2015 season needs to have the WAR for each team added together.  It wasn't two 0.8 WAR seasons like some people are pretending here, it was one 1.6 WAR season split between two teams.  His loan season under 1.6 WAR, 2014, was an anomaly, as he missed almost half the season (played in 88 games).  The doom and gloom comments about Trumbo's prospects to succeed are very overstated, IMO.

It doesn't matter. He is here for several years now. Learn to love the bomb. 

dr-strangelove-still-580.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Maybe he isn't a more than adequate first baseman?

Well, he's played 4,000 innings at 1B in the minors with a fielding pct. of .994 with 26 errors.  By comparison, Chris Davis played 1,300 , .986, 18. Eric Hosmer played 2,000, .991. 20.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ELMERO said:

Well, he's played 4,000 innings at 1B in the minors with a fielding pct. of .994 with 26 errors.  By comparison, Chris Davis played 1,300 , .986, 18. Eric Hosmer played 2,000, .991. 20.  

All the evaluators have him at average or below for that position and that position alone. We can use our eyes to say differently, but I don't expect gold glove defense from Trey. He is strong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...