Jump to content

Lineup


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, weams said:

This is Roch Kubatko's for tomorrow

Seth Smith RF
Adam Jones CF
Manny Machado 3B
Chris Davis 1B
Mark Trumbo DH
Jonathan Schoop 2B
Hyun Soo Kim LF
Welington Castillo C
J.J. Hardy SS

Yours?

Nice but your best OBP batter shouldn't be batting 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Kim

Smith

Jones

Machado

Davis

Trumbo

Castillo

Schoop

Hardy

Or use a hat.

 

 

I like this lineup. Kim should be 1 or 2, Davis should not bat 4th, strikeout way too much and he's a rally killer. Machado should bat cleanup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Roch's lineup but I am not crazy about Jones #2. I'd like Kim with Smith up top to get on base for Manny. If they bring in a lefty you have Mancini and Rickard to pinch hit. Bunches up the RH hitters in the bottom half, but all of those guys can handle RHPs. 

Smith RF

Kim LF

Machado 3B

Davis 1B

Trumbo DH

Jones CF

Schoop 2B

Castillo C

Hardy SS

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I like Roch's lineup but I am not crazy about Jones #2. I'd like Kim with Smith up top to get on base for Manny. If they bring in a lefty you have Mancini and Rickard to pinch hit. Bunches up the RH hitters in the bottom half, but all of those guys can handle RHPs. 

Smith RF

Kim LF

Machado 3B

Davis 1B

Trumbo DH

Jones CF

Schoop 2B

Castillo C

Hardy SS

 

 

 

I went Kim-Smith over Smith-Kim since I figured Kim would be most vulnerable to GIDP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I like Roch's lineup but I am not crazy about Jones #2. I'd like Kim with Smith up top to get on base for Manny. If they bring in a lefty you have Mancini and Rickard to pinch hit. Bunches up the RH hitters in the bottom half, but all of those guys can handle RHPs. 

Smith RF

Kim LF

Machado 3B

Davis 1B

Trumbo DH

Jones CF

Schoop 2B

Castillo C

Hardy SS

 

 

 

This is my lineup for Opening day for me, but having Kim bat sixth makes sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MDtransplant757 said:

This is my lineup for Opening day for me, but having Kim bat sixth makes sense 

Can you explain the reasoning to me?  I'm lost as to why a low speed, low power, high OBP piece should be batting between the heart of the order and the bottom of the order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Can you explain the reasoning to me?  I'm lost as to why a low speed, low power, high OBP piece should be batting between the heart of the order and the bottom of the order.

Roch has him there because he is a lefty and splits up the RH batters. Makes matchups more difficult for the other team in the later innings. If you put Jones there, you would have RH batters 5th through 9th. I see the case for both lineups.

Also Kim is not a slugger by any means but he has some pop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Roch has him there because he is a lefty and splits up the RH batters. Makes matchups more difficult for the other team in the later innings. If you put Jones there, you would have RH batters 5th through 9th. I see the case for both lineups.

Also Kim is not a slugger by any means but he has some pop. 

While I expect his power numbers to be higher this year we are talking about someone that had six HR in 306 AB.  That is behind everyone in the lineup except Hardy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

This is Roch Kubatko's for tomorrow

Seth Smith RF
Adam Jones CF
Manny Machado 3B
Chris Davis 1B
Mark Trumbo DH
Jonathan Schoop 2B
Hyun Soo Kim LF
Welington Castillo C
J.J. Hardy SS

Yours?

I don't like having Davis, Trumbo, and Schoop back-back-back.  Too many K's in there.  And while Kim and Smith both do a good job getting on base, Smith has more power and Kim had a much higher OBP last year.  They should be switched. I don't like Adam Jones at 2 either.  Not patient enough and too many GIDP. 

Optimal lineup IMO (versus RH):

1. Kim LF 2. Machado 3B 3. Davis 1B 4. Jones CF 5. Trumbo DH 6. Smith RF 7. Schoop 2B 8. Castillo C 9. Hardy SS

Wednesday against Happ I would go: 1. Rickard LF 2. Machado 3B 3. Trumbo DH 4. Jones CF 5. Davis 1B 6. Mancini RF 7. Schoop 2B 8. Castillo C 9. Hardy SS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...