Jump to content

Late inning relievers


gcates9898

Recommended Posts

Two years ago the late inning progression was Brach, O'Day, Britton, BOB. The late inning bullpen was pretty damn good. Yes?

Last year the late inning progression became O'Day, Brach, Britton, OBB. The results were not quite as good. Were they?

This year the bull pen became whoever, Brach because O'Day and Britton were on the DL. Once we got all three on the field at the same time, the progression was O'Day, Brach. Britton, OBB. This threesome has not been all that effective. Anyone want to disagree? Watching the game on TV from the center field camera, it seems pretty obvious to me. Brach and Britton are pretty much the same type of pitches. One comes from the right side and the other comes from the left side. The demonstrated effective bullpen progression put someone in between B & B that threw from a totally different perspective. 

Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe the O's coaching staff needs to go back and look at what was very effective two years ago. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's exactly what you said which is the reason. Injuries.

O'Day was injured most of last year, so they had to use Brach more prominently; which his overuse last year probably led to a drop of effectiveness this year. At the same time O'Day had to come back this year and prove himself to be effective again with a shaky start coming back from the injury of last year.

It looks like O'Day has certainly been more effective this second half. Buck might not necessarily go with the BOB order unless everyone is well rested and it's a must win game. With Givens in the mix he seems to opt to give at least one of the guys a night off to rest them instead of using all of his bullets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O'Day hasn't been as consistent in 2016-17 as he was in 2012-15.   That's not a function of how he's been used; rather, how he's been used has been dictated by his inconsistency, and some injuries he's had.

Brach also has been somewhat inconsistent, in my opinion because of necessity he's been overused at times (due to injuries to Britton and O'Day).

Givens has been very good but also has been overused at times.   

Britton hasn't been that good even when he's been available, compared to past seasons.    That's not due to any change in role.    

Overall, it's still a pretty good back end.    But to the extent they've taken a step down, I don't think it's due to Buck changing their roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...