Jump to content

#3 Prospect - Chris Tillman - RHP


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

You are entitled to your opinion, though I definitely feel you have some bias because you didn't like him personally and felt betrayed when he left the Orioles.

I just don't agree at all with your statement that he was a "tin man." Mussina had 10 full seasons with the Orioles. In those 10 years he was in the top 10 in IP six times (including a 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th) and the top 10 in complete games 5 times.

Have a look at his 1995 season. That year he threw games of 140, 138, 134, 133, and 130 pitches, and 8 other games over 120 pitches. If an Oriole pitcher throws even one game like that now we're ready to call the manager insane!

In those 10 years Mussina received Cy Young votes in 7 of them, and was an all-star 5 times. If that isn't a no. 1 starter then the term is meaningless.

I'm sure my thoughts on Mussina are probably biased because of my dislike for the guy, but I still know way too many Mussina stories from people close to him to ever call him a true number one. the fact that the guy left a situation where he was the no doubt ace to become a number 2 or 3 tells me everything I need to know about his heart or lack thereof.

Mussina was a gifted pitcher who I have to grudgingly accept is probably a HOF guy. But there are a lot of guys in the hall of fame who weren't aces.

Mussina had ace seasons no doubt, and when he was at his best with the Orioles he could be that kind of guy, but he was also the kind of guy that pulled himself out of the games and then would get PO'd at the bullpen for blowing things. He would have won 20 games several times with the Orioles had he had a little more gumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You can certainly build an argument that Mussina was an ace at one time, but he's a tinman who never wanted the pressure of being the guy. He's the guy who pulled himself out of close games here in Baltimore and then would pout when the bullpen blew his wins.

Part of being a true number one ace is attitude as well. There are lots of very good pitchers like Mussina who have had number one starter season, but that doesn't mean they were true aces.

Really a lot of this is semantics. Mussina had a plus fastball back in the day and two plus pitches in his knuckle-curve and changeup. I guess if I take away the fact that he left a team to become a number 2 or 3 starter on another team, then you can build a better case for him as an ace in my opinion.

Who are those non-ace pitchers with a number one starter season that are going to or in the Hall of Fame?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure my thoughts on Mussina are probably biased because of my dislike for the guy, but I still know way too many Mussina stories from people close to him to ever call him a true number one. the fact that the guy left a situation where he was the no doubt ace to become a number 2 or 3 tells me everything I need to know about his heart or lack thereof.

Mussina was a gifted pitcher who I have to grudgingly accept is probably a HOF guy. But there are a lot of guys in the hall of fame who weren't aces.

Mussina had ace seasons no doubt, and when he was at his best with the Orioles he could be that kind of guy, but he was also the kind of guy that pulled himself out of the games and then would get PO'd at the bullpen for blowing things. He would have won 20 games several times with the Orioles had he had a little more gumption.

One of these days, when I have even more time to waste on projects like this than I already spend, I'm going to go through every game Mussina pitched for the O's and break down just how many more he might have won if he had stayed in the game. Until then, all I can do is repeat what I said before - his complete games and innings pitched were among the highest in the league when he was here, and he had many games where he threw a number of pitches that bordered on the insane.

As to his decision to leave the O's, it had nothing to do with running away from being a no. 1 starter. It had to do with the fact that Angelos treated him badly during negotiations, the Orioles decided to head into major rebuilding mode, and the Yankees offered him a package that was far more than the Orioles had ever offered, and in fact far more than Mussina had demanded from the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...