Jump to content

McKenna has himself a day


Frobby

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Funny, I was trying to recall Endy Chavez’s name earlier today when thinking about McKenna.  Thing is, Chavez was a .672 OPS hitter.   That’s subpar, but not ridiculous for a really good defender.   McKenna is presently at .536.    That’s abysmal.   And yes, there will be times where his defense and baserunning will win you a game, but lack of offense loses a lot of games.    You really can’t carry a .536 OPS outfielder.   You just have to hope they are able to get their bat up to a non-embarrassing level.  That’s my hope for McKenna.   

Well I don’t disagree with anything you said. My feeling about McKenna is Similar to how I feel about Jonathan Villar. He’s a good player on a bad team. He was on the Astros, and when the Astros got better they sent him to the Brewers, and when the Brewers got better they sent him to the oriole, and we send him to wherever.

That’s why I never claimed that McKenna would be any kind of a centerpiece. He’s good for us now,, he may be good for us later,And if he’s not, we’ll send him where he is.

I will admit that I might be overvaluing Defense and speed, perhaps because it is so rare on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Well I don’t disagree with anything you said. My feeling about McKenna is Similar to how I feel about Jonathan Villar. He’s a good player on a bad team. He was on the Astros, and when the Astros got better they sent him to the Brewers, and when the Brewers got better they sent him to the oriole, and we send him to wherever.

That’s why I never claimed that McKenna would be any kind of a centerpiece. He’s good for us now,, he may be good for us later,And if he’s not, we’ll send him where he is.

I will admit that I might be overvaluing Defense and speed, perhaps because it is so rare on this team.

It’s not the slowest Orioles team I can remember, by a long shot.   For whatever reason, team speed has rarely been an Orioles feature, except for 1973-74.  I guess the BRob/Patterson teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ohhhh RZNJ, resident tough guy.  I’m shaking in my boots. 

Pretty funny how he used a small sample size to write off others negative opinion of McKenna and then used a small sample size to support his argument. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Hopefully, more objective posters can just look at the original posts when all I said that it's too soon to call McKenna only a 4th outfielder and that he had put up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.   I didn't try to mislead anyone.     Now that your Corn's butt boy I guess this is your new schtick.   LOL

WTH you bringing me into this for?

You might have a problem you need to get looked at.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

Philip brought up David Lough.  2014 Lough was pretty valuable (1.5 rWAR) with a .694 OPS; 2015 Lough was useless (-0.2 rWAR) at .555 OPS.   If McKenna is going to have long term value he needs to be more like the former than the latter.   He’s managed to have positive value (0.6 rWAR) despite an OPS below Lough’s 2015 so far, but I wouldn’t expect that to be sustained if he doesn’t hit better.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Philip said:

 

I never understood what people saw in Lough. He always seemed like a really good athlete that just didn't have very good baseball instincts.

 

Even on that play you posted, he takes a bad route/read at the beginning of it and makes up for it with his speed. Those 2014/2015 teams were one or 2 key players away from really competing for a World Series. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, canonfaz said:

I never understood what people saw in Lough. He always seemed like a really good athlete that just didn't have very good baseball instincts.

 

Even on that play you posted, he takes a bad route/read at the beginning of it and makes up for it with his speed. Those 2014/2015 teams were one or 2 key players away from really competing for a World Series. ?

On the contrary, I thought he was an outstanding defender. The only problem we had in 2014 was we ran into the Royals when they were on a hot streak. I really don’t think we did anything wrong against the Royals, they just were getting all the breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Philip said:

On the contrary, I thought he was an outstanding defender. The only problem we had in 2014 was we ran into the Royals when they were on a hot streak. I really don’t think we did anything wrong against the Royals, they just were getting all the breaks.

You may be right, I'm just going from my memory on what I thought of Lough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philip said:

On the contrary, I thought he was an outstanding defender. The only problem we had in 2014 was we ran into the Royals when they were on a hot streak. I really don’t think we did anything wrong against the Royals, they just were getting all the breaks.

The Royals were the worst possible matchup for the Orioles that year in the American League playoffs. The Royals had a very good defense, an offense that could grind out runs and a lights out bullpen. That's a recipe for success in October. 

I badly wanted the Angels to win in the ALDS against the Royals. There are no guarantees, but I'm confident the Orioles would have beaten the Angels in six games. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The Royals were the worst possible matchup for the Orioles that year in the American League playoffs. The Royals had a very good defense, an offense that could grind out runs and a lights out bullpen. That's a recipe for success in October. 

I badly wanted the Angels to win in the ALDS against the Royals. There are no guarantees, but I'm confident the Orioles would have beaten the Angels in six games. 

 

The Royals were just on a roll, I fully expected them to win it all, I don’t think God and his angels could’ve beaten them that week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip said:

On the contrary, I thought he was an outstanding defender. The only problem we had in 2014 was we ran into the Royals when they were on a hot streak. I really don’t think we did anything wrong against the Royals, they just were getting all the breaks.

Lough was an outstanding defender.   He had two big issues.  First, he wasn’t a good hitter and hie hitting style didn’t utilize his speed at all.  I feel like he was forever hitting lazy fly balls to medium depth OF, never slashing it around or hitting grounders that he might beat out with his speed.    Second, for a guy who was very fast, he was a poor base stealer, swiping 10 bases while being thrown out 9 times as an Oriole.   He was worth -2 runs as a baserunner for the Orioles.   

As to the 2014 playoffs, he only had one AB in the ALDS and one more in the ALCS.   We lost that series because the guys who played and pitched regularly didn’t play as well as the Royals.   Simple as that.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Game winning slide on Sunday, walkoff base on balls on Wednesday. Solid week for McKenna!

And he came in the game as a pinch-hitter in the 8th - walked and scored the 6th run pulling us within a run.  Then comes in to play defense and gets the walkoff walk.  Doing just what you want from a 4th OFer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...