Jump to content

For those who think we went a bit under slot on some picks, have we drafted any over slot guys?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, baltfan said:

Jud Fabian went back to school.  They have to be more likely to go back to school than juniors who lose all leverage.   

It's it's doubtful Fabian will get more than he was going to get from the Red Sox last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Interesting question.

My instinct is that they had some sort of "make up" deal with Fabian after last year.

What do you mean by “make up” deal?  They used a draft pick and some of our pool money because they felt bad about what happened last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Agreed but he did decide to bet on himself.  He just lost

True, and I have zero issues with kids who do so, but most do not win. I'd imagine since the slotting system came into place (something that needs to happen with an international draft too), very few players who were drafted in the first five rounds who did not sign and went back increased their bonus the next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

True, and I have zero issues with kids who do so, but most do not win. I'd imagine since the slotting system came into place (something that needs to happen with an international draft too), very few players who were drafted in the first five rounds who did not sign and went back increased their bonus the next year.

Gerrit Cole is the best example of someone who bet and won.  Leiter as well.  But neither of them were sophomores, though they turned down big dollars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Gerrit Cole is the best example of someone who bet and won.  Leiter as well.  But neither of them were sophomores, though they turned down big dollars

Most apparently is the word you missed in my true statement. ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

It's it's doubtful Fabian will get more than he was going to get from the Red Sox last year.

One thing these players often fail to consider is that by delaying the start of their pro career, they very likely are delaying the date at which they first reach the majors (if they do).   And that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, or millions, depending on timing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

One thing these players often fail to consider is that by delaying the start of their pro career, they very likely are delaying the date at which they first reach the majors (if they do).   And that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, or millions, depending on timing. 

Unfortunately the attention and boost you get from an org is often based on draft position.  So you might be better off going a year later if you are drafted higher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Unfortunately the attention and boost you get from an org is often based on draft position.  So you might be better off going a year later if you are drafted higher. 

True, but only if you were drafted much lower (like 11th round or below) or are still under 21. Teams nowadays know almost everyone's number so there are very few situations when players aren't signed in the first 10 rounds with the new slotting system. As Frobby pointed out, delaying your professional career a year could cost you $700K or more if you reach the majors a year later than you might have. 

Obviously every situtation and player is different, so I'm not saying there's a one size fits all right answer, but very few guys come out with no leverage as a 22-year old and get more money than they would have received as a junior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

True, but only if you were drafted much lower (like 11th round or below) or are still under 21. Teams nowadays know almost everyone's number so there are very few situations when players aren't signed in the first 10 rounds with the new slotting system. As Frobby pointed out, delaying your professional career a year could cost you $700K or more if you reach the majors a year later than you might have. 

Obviously every situtation and player is different, so I'm not saying there's a one size fits all right answer, but very few guys come out with no leverage as a 22-year old and get more money than they would have received as a junior.

Yeah but if you are an 8th rounder you aren’t getting the leash of a 3rd rounder and also probably have to be significantly better for them to sit the third rounder.  You might be better off getting playing time while waiting another year.  Arguments both ways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Well he isn't exactly tearing it up since he got sent down.  I think he is something like 6 for 31 since?  Which makes him 8 for 70  (roughly) since his call up. Which is batting around .115 or so for the past month. He has obviously hit a level of talent that he is not handling all that well.  Considering his age, unless he really starts tearing it up?  I would be inclined to leave him down in AAA all year until the late season call ups.   
    • Roy, man I love you as a sportscaster personality and more importantly as just a genuinely nice person.   I do. But this is why I said last week in the thread you made about how the O's would get blown out by the Yankees that you are saying things lately that don't seem to be making much sense and many other posters would be banned by now for the same things. And don't get me wrong.  I don't want you banned and I hope you keep posting for a long long time.  You are a true O's, albeit very emotional..FAN. But Roy, read the OP.  He clearly said those trade ideas were from a Red's message board. 2 times I believe. Cmonnnnnnnn man!   BTW as far as the actual trade ideas?  Laughable.  Not even being a homer.  But just laughable.
    • Kremer is an excellent athlete and I think, think, I heard he had some experience catching.
    • One of our friends ran into him at a game. He invite him, his girlfriend, and her two kids up into the owners’ suite to watch the game with him. 
    • Kremer is included in that, so we will have to take somebody out of the rotation and it will be a difficult decision. Hopefully we can preserve their ammunition for late in the season, by somehow rotating the rotation.
    • Just based on pure stuff to overwhelm hitters at the end of a game, I'd say this would be Grayson Rodriguez. But I'd rather have Grayson Rodriguez as a starter so I went with Albert Suarez because he has some swing and miss in his very good stuff, and I don't want to take Burnes/Bradish/Means/Rodrigez/Irvin out of the Rotation. So by default it goes to the best swing and miss guy we have not in the starting rotation, and I'm mindful of how alot of former starters have become superb closers. (I'm thinking of Smoltz, right off the bat).
    • I bet it would be so much fun to sit with him and watch a game and talk baseball. Like you said, he seems like a warm and friendly person, but he's also smart and knows his baseball history (and world history too).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...