Jump to content

Glavine Tomorrow Night


shorebird22

Recommended Posts

ESPN made a good point of noticing that Tom Glavine may be the last pitcher (or at least for quite some time maybe) to win 300 games. Relying on bullpens and extended periods between starts has diminished win totals for starters in recent decades. Not to mention the fact that pitchers now typically spend much more time in the minors.

Top ten active pitchers by Wins (Age):

1. R Clemens-351 (44)

2. G Maddux-340 (41)

3. T Glavine-299 (41)

4. R Johnson-284 (43)

5. M Mussina-244 (38)

6. D Wells-235 (44)

7. J Moyer-225 (44)

8. C Schilling-213 (40)

9. K Rogers-210 (42)

10. P Martinez-206 (35)

Of that list (excluding the top 3), uncertainties are abound. If Johnson can eek out one more solid season (or two more injury-plagued mediocre seasons, if he ever does come back) he certainly has a chance. Moose is looking at least 4-5 more solid seasons excluding any wins accumulated between now and the off-season; Martinez can't seem to stay healthy of late; and the rest of the list is just plain too old. I'll certainly be watching tomorrow night, just in case.

BTW, notable pitchers for years to come:

J Santana-89 (28)

J Garland-90 (27)

C Sabathia-94 (27)

B Colon-146 (34)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good question. I'm not sure if Johnson comes back next year. Mussina may have a chance, but the younger, established guys I've looked at aren't on pace.

Oswalt will be 30 this month (109 wins) and is averaging about 16 wins/year.

Peavy is 26 (68 wins) and averages around 16 wins/year.

Buehrle is 28 (106 wins); also about 16 wins/year. If he can keep this pace until he is 40 he has a chance.

There's no telling if any of these guys will maintain their performance for another decade or not. It may be another 10 years before there is another 300 game winner. 2007 has really seen a lot of milestones; Bonds, Biggio, Clemens, A. Rodriguez, Thomas, Sosa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Oswalt plans on retiring after his age 35 season. At least that's what I read a while ago. Apparently it's always been his plan, milestones be damned.

There's no chance Buehrle gets to 300 wins because Buerhle is just not that good of a pitcher.

I fully expect Randy to keep playing until he hits 300. If Pedro rebounds and keeps on for another 7-8 years, he could, but that's a bit unlikely.

Not that it matters at all, in any context, ever, how many wins a pitcher has. (edit: I was about to cut this line out because I know I'm exaggerating, but I re-read it and I think people'll think I'm being sarcastic. I'm not. Wins are not something to spend excessive amounts of time discussing. I feel unclean.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep Mrs. Glavine's got it goin on ;)

Randy Johnson could do it, but I don't think he will. Mussina I think would have a better chance than him only because he's just a little bit younger. Everyone else is pretty much winding down to the end of their career.

I was watching the Mets game on tv. It's just weird that I watched possibly the last 300 game winner before I like....die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
    • Left the game with 1 run in and 2 on ,2 outs in the 6th and Akin gave up both runs. Bad luck tonight in my opinion but I'm sure there are many on here will say he sucks and should be replaced. 
    • Yeah, we're kind of getting off track here since this is a Jackson Holliday thread, but I will say I don't see how Mountcastle gets traded -- and even if he did it would be to unblock Mayo and not Kjerstad.  Both Mounty and Mayo are righties, and it doesn't look like Mayo will play third base anytime soon.  I think two of the prospects need to get traded -- maybe in the offseason or next season -- unless Hays, O'Hearn or Mounty are dealt.  I think there's a chance the O's bring back Santander, but that's a big wildcard too.
    • I was in favor of trading one of Mountcastle/Hays/Santander after last year to make room for prospects like Kjerstad. I see the main issue with trading one of the above or O'Hearn is those players will deliver more value in an Orioles uniform over the return in any trade. I'm leaning towards Elias taking a calculated risk and creating at bats for Kjerstad.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...