Jump to content

9/11 - Orioles vs. Red Sox - Never Forget


86this

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

As I have said for awhile with all the injuries we have very little wiggle room to win games.  An error here bad baserunning not getting runners in with less then two outs all are magnified because of it.  

Do you mean to say, "As I have said for a while with all the injuries and the subpar play of Rutschman, Holliday, Mayo, the replacement position players brought in by Elias, O'Hearn, Kimbrel and some others, we have very little wiggle room to win games.  An error here bad baserunning not getting runners in with less then two outs all are magnified because of it."

I am worried that the starters are going to melt down from the pressure of knowing, in almost every game, they can't give up more than 2 runs in their 5 to 7 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Oh, I’ll argue until the cows come home. Good pitchers don’t have a 2 cent head and fall apart there. Pick up your team. It’d be one thing if it was an RBI groundout or sac fly, but an abysmal pitch to add to an already dismal track record of poor performance with runners on and in high leverage situations.

You can’t trust Akin. Both things can be true: Jackson stunk, Akin lost it. 

I don’t disagree that you can’t really trust Akin. 

But I think the entire concept of using him in that spot hinges on having the ability to walk O’Neill. The dude just murders lefties…2nd best hitter in MLB against lefties this year (behind only Judge). An ISO of .417 against lefties, which is laughably dominant. No one who wasn’t actively on steroids has ever even approached a .417 ISO over the course of a full season.

Everything is unfolding according to plan. Dominates Devers, gets the ground ball right to a perfectly placed 2B. All you need is for everyone to make basic professional ballplayer plays. And the kid just couldn’t do it.

Obviously, you can’t just let Akin off the hook for giving up the bomb. They both failed, as you said. But the degree of difficulty for Akin there (get O’Neill out as a lefty) was just so much higher than it was for Jackson (field grounder right at you). And it was the error that directly caused the worst possible scenario for Akin — a scenario that was always destined for a high likelihood of failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, e16bball said:

I don’t disagree that you can’t really trust Akin. 

But I think the entire concept of using him in that spot hinges on having the ability to walk O’Neill. The dude just murders lefties…2nd best hitter in MLB against lefties this year (behind only Judge). An ISO of .417 against lefties, which is laughably dominant. No one who wasn’t actively on steroids has ever even approached a .417 ISO over the course of a full season.

Everything is unfolding according to plan. Dominates Devers, gets the ground ball right to a perfectly placed 2B. All you need is for everyone to make basic professional ballplayer plays. And the kid just couldn’t do it.

Obviously, you can’t just let Akin off the hook for giving up the bomb. They both failed, as you said. But the degree of difficulty for Akin there (get O’Neill out as a lefty) was just so much higher than it was for Jackson (field grounder right at you). And it was the error that directly caused the worst possible scenario for Akin — a scenario that was always destined for a high likelihood of failure.

Right. Walk O’Neill, take your chances with Yoshida who is abysmal against lefties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LookitsPuck said:

Before tonight, Akin had an 834 OPS against with RISP and an 810 OPS against in high leverage situations.

Right, he's not a guy you want in high leverage. He's better earlier in games. But again, Holliday makes a simple routing play and he's walking that guy and going after the two lefties. Everything was set up for this to be as successful as possible. Holliday just blew it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Right, he's not a guy you want in high leverage. He's better earlier in games. But again, Holliday makes a simple routing play and he's walking that guy and going after the two lefties. Everything was set up for this to be as successful as possible. Holliday just blew it up.

They should have walked ONeill anyway.

Akin shouldn’t have put a ball anywhere near there.

Yes, Hollidays error was crucial but it was a dumb decision not to walk him and even worse pitch to throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

They should have walked ONeill anyway.

Akin shouldn’t have put a ball anywhere near there.

Yes, Hollidays error was crucial but it was a dumb decision not to walk him and even worse pitch to throw.

I really can't argue that overall, though it's really tough to put the winning run on 2nd base with one out. I think the problem with that is Masataka Yoshida was on deck, and while he struggled against lefties overall, he does do a good job of situational hitting. 

At the end of the day, I'd feel a lot better pitching to him with only the tying run on 3rd, not the winning run on 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I really can't argue that overall, though it's really tough to put the winning run on 2nd base with one out. I think the problem with that is Masataka Yoshida was on deck, and while he struggled against lefties overall, he does do a good job of situational hitting. 

At the end of the day, I'd feel a lot better pitching to him with only the tying run on 3rd, not the winning run on 2B.

I don’t disagree…the Holliday error made the situation difficult. That said, when presented with 2 bad choices, I think you should choose the lesser of 2 evils and Akin facing the lefties that struggle may have been just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...