Jump to content

Option decisions …


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

If they don't pick up O'Hearn's option he is a free agent.  The question is do they want to spend 8m on him or do they want to spent that money on a solid hitting righty?

This is a big question IMO. I am not sure it is an either or, though. I would try to do both. Keep O'Hearn for one year as a veteran presence to platoon with Mayo (presumably Mountie is traded) and spend FA money to IMPROVE on the RH outfield spot taken by Hays/Slater.

So essentially replay Mountcastle/Hays with Mayo/FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roll Tide said:
 

 

The O's club option decisions: Recently I have written here and here about upcoming roster decisions the O’s must make on 2025 club options they hold for Ryan O’Hearn and Seranthony Domínguez.

Clubs holding such options on their players for next year must make those decisions within five days of the end of the World Series.

The O’s list of club options on players for next year:

 

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We bring everyone back except that we have an option, or can tender arb to, except Soto.

I don’t see us spending $8 million on a lefty that is out of options when we have 3 other ones in the same boat. Coloumbe, Akin, and Perez. If anything, we just need the roster flexibility to rotate arms in the pen. 

Soto isn't a special guy in the bullpen.  He's a guy who can be dominant for 2 weeks and then implode when you need him most.  I would rather upgrade his spot in the bullpen.  Can probably get a much better guy in free agency for 2 years/$16 mill or a little more, so no extra money.  Will Elias be willing to nontender him, thereby admitting he made a mistake?  Coulombe is definitely a keeper.  Akin and Perez have their moments.  I feel like one of them is brought back.  I would say Akin can provide longer outings and Perez has more upside.  If I had to guess, the O's keep Akin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel that bringing back Urias and Mateo would make sense, especially as Holliday and Mayo haven't proved themselves as regulars yet.  I would rather keep a very versatile guy like Mateo who is also a difference maker as a pinch runner and defensive replacement than have to grab a marginal MLB guy like 2022 Odor or Frazier.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

 

Soto isn't a special guy in the bullpen.  He's a guy who can be dominant for 2 weeks and then implode when you need him most.  I would rather upgrade his spot in the bullpen.  Can probably get a much better guy in free agency for 2 years/$16 mill or a little more, so no extra money.  Will Elias be willing to nontender him, thereby admitting he made a mistake?  Coulombe is definitely a keeper.  Akin and Perez have their moments.  I feel like one of them is brought back.  I would say Akin can provide longer outings and Perez has more upside.  If I had to guess, the O's keep Akin.  

He was arguably the best arm in the bullpen the last month. Why would you think Elias made a mistake?  He traded for a guy and he was an overwhelming success. If what we saw the last 6 weeks is the pitcher that pitched for Detroit, then it was a great trade.

Edited by 1fingerwillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Roll Tide said:


I’m betting they keep all of these guys except Jimenez

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/random-take-tuesday-1-4

Honestly, I would bring back O'Hearn and Coulumbe and let the rest go.  We've wrung all the magic out of Cionel Perez' arm, Eloy Jimenez has lost whatever magic he had... same for Seranthony.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

Honestly, I would bring back O'Hearn and Coulumbe and let the rest go.  We've wrung all the magic out of Cionel Perez' arm, Eloy Jimenez has lost whatever magic he had... same for Seranthony.  

Like Soto, I assume that Elias was pretty pleased with Seranthony. Not sure why he wouldn't pick up his option.

Edited by 1fingerwillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 1fingerwillie said:

He was arguably the best arm in the bullpen the last month. Why would you think Elias made a mistake?  He traded for a guy and he was an overwhelming success. If what we saw the last 6 weeks is the pitcher that pitched for Detroit, then it was a great trade.

The last month of the season for him consisted of 9 innings in which he allowed 10 hits and a .286 batting average and a .324 OBP - Not exactly dominate.   Over his last 17.2 innings (The last two months of the season) he allowed 20 hits.  In August he also posted a .286 batting average and a .405 OBP.  Maybe we take a gamble on him returning to 2021/2022 form, but I'm not convinced we couldn't do better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I can see the pro and con case for just about all of these guys. None of them break the bank but none of them are exactly cheap. 

Coulombe has been incredible for us, but he will be 35, had a major injury last year, and is a soft tossing lefty. Can he continue to produce? 

Soto finished pretty strong but hard to completely overlook poor splits and those terrible appearances when he first came over. 

Dominguez could be dominant at times but that 2.4 HR/9 is ugly.  

Perez can be dominant at times and he's cheap. But the 7+ K/9 and 4+ BB/9 just doesn't play. 

O'Hearn did OK but only as a strict platoon guy. He messes up our lineup if someone wants to throw an opener at us, and/or needs a pinch hitter for high leverage. Really makes game management difficult. Mayo is going to need AB's vs RHP and Holliday/Urias can help with the DH spot vs RHP. 

I'm inclined to pick up Coulombe and Dominguez, pass on Perez, and 50/50 on Soto and O'Hearn. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BRobinsonfan said:

The last month of the season for him consisted of 9 innings in which he allowed 10 hits and a .286 batting average and a .324 OBP - Not exactly dominate.   Over his last 17.2 innings (The last two months of the season) he allowed 20 hits.  In August he also posted a .286 batting average and a .405 OBP.  Maybe we take a gamble on him returning to 2021/2022 form, but I'm not convinced we couldn't do better. 

As a closer. 

I have him at 22 innings in the last month...not 9. Last month is 3.97 era with 28 Ks to 9 walks and 10 saves.

I think Elias would be happy with that considering he will not be closing games in 25.

Edited by 1fingerwillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The splits for the second half definitely do kinda look like that on the surface, but it was more an issue of one awful slump, rather than an overall second half swoon, especially in 2023. In 2023, he really just had a terrible week or so, which unfortunately happened to be the last week of the season. He went 0 for his last 23, dropping his OPS from .855 to .801 in the process. Prior to that dreadful week, he’d posted an .846 OPS in the second half. This past season, of course, it was almost a whole terrible month — starting right around the day Mountcastle went out. From 8/18 to 9/15, he put up a .411 OPS over the span of 80 PAs. Absolutely awful. But sandwiched around that malaise were two good second half stints, with a combined .926 OPS in 130 second half PAs before and after that tailspin.    Anyhow, I don’t think there’s any way they decline that option. The guy is a quality hitter, so even if they do want to move on — which I don’t think they will — he’d have value to somebody at that relatively low price. Especially if they were willing to eat a few bucks to sweeten the return. If they somehow get a bona fide starting RF from outside the organization, then I think maybe they move him. You don’t want him blocking Kjerstad again, but at present, I think it’s reasonable to imagine that they could both find 400-500 PAs. 
    • Im not sure what the deal is with Holliday-to-CF truthers, but he was above average by OAA, average by UZR, and slightly below by DRS at 2B, so it feels like we should give him the opportunity to improve there rather than move him to a position he hasn't really played in his career.
    • If that’s the case , then they can trade Bradfield for other options 
    • Perez seems like an easy re-up to me. You need arms, they're not all going to be perfect. He's got some strengths.
    • Garcia is getting some pub from different spots.  Could be a major riser.
    • They did guarantee his arbitration years but they didn’t add any years to their control.  
    • Tis' the season for over the top, which should end around Opening Day... Sign Bregman, move Westburg back to 2B.  Lose O'Hearn and make Kjerstad the LH platoon at 1B along with Mountcastle.  Holliday quickly transitions to CF (because if Merrill can do it, naturally so can Holliday) and Mullins is in RF along with a RHB 1-year FA stopgap while Mayo learns RF in Norfolk.  Henderson, Rutschman, Cowser no change. If someone brings up the subject of defense, kindly look the other way.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...