Jump to content

Trouble in Bonus Town?


Recommended Posts

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bal-orioles-draft-724,0,1561602.story

A little more than three weeks before the deadline to sign 2009 draft picks before losing their rights, Orioles director of amateur scouting Joe Jordan admitted that he is disappointed in the team's failure to sign more of their selections. The Orioles have signed 20 of their 50 picks, including five of their top 10.

"It's very disappointing that we haven't been able to get more of them out early and let them play this summer," Jordan said. "I don't think it's because of a lack of effort on our side. These players are very controlled by the people advising them. Guys are just going to have to understand that they're not going to get the money that they think they're going to.

"Sometimes you just have to hang in there with them and let this play out. We still have a lot of players we're going to sign. We've been trying to get things done, but we're getting to the point where we're going to have to sign the guys that want to go out and play."

Jordan acknowledged that there is a chance that the team won't be able to sign several of its top 10 picks and would instead put the money toward late-round selections the organization wasn't necessarily planning to sign originally.

The list of unsigned draftees includes second-round pick Mychal Givens, a high school shortstop out of Tampa, Fla. Jordan said there has been very little dialogue between the team and Givens' agent, former major league outfielder Ken Felder. If the Orioles were unable to sign Givens, they'd get a compensation pick in next year's draft.

"I hope if it doesn't come to that, but if it does it does," Jordan said. "We're going to make a good effort and if he doesn't sign, I'll be very disappointed. But I'll get over it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I was thinking it meant when we signed our 50th rounder yesterday Tim Berry. We do have a lot of kids in those high rounds who have huge potential, it just that they will also take a good bit to sign to keep them from going to college. I really hope we get Henry and Tolliver. It sounds like Henry should sign, but havent heard anything on Tolliver who was orignially rated by BA as a better prospect than Henry. We could really bennefit frmo signing Coffey as well, those are the ones who I think we need to make a major effort in signing.

On a side note, which is a question, If we do not sign Givens who was slotted at 2:5, what pick will we get next year? Will it be 2:6? Id prefer to get a comp pick if it is 2:6 for next year, there was so much talent left available this year, hopefully in 2010 we make a better pick, Im honestly not thrilled with the Givens pick, maybe its just because I favor pitching so much....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great! First not drafting the best player available in the 1st round, then not signing one player worth mentioning internationally and now not even being able to sign half of the top 20 picks?

You have to be kidding me! I will give them until the deadline but for us the draft is so crucial that if they screw that up as well Jordan and/or MacPhail have to be held accountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I see where your coming from with that. IMO as long as we sign some key players, we could have as strong of a draft in 09 as we have in a while though. Just make sure we nab the good ones and the others that would be system fillers, it doesnt matter. Im far from a JJ basher, but if we werent gonna sign em, we may as well have drafted the top notch names and given us a chance that way. I guess though, the theory Joe took into the draft here with the value risky picks, this kind of a process should be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great! First not drafting the best player available in the 1st round, then not signing one player worth mentioning internationally and now not even being able to sign half of the top 20 picks?

You have to be kidding me! I will give them until the deadline but for us the draft is so crucial that if they screw that up as well Jordan and/or MacPhail have to be held accountable.

Half of the top 20 picks? I didnt realize that the signing period was already over........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, the "not going to get what they think they'll get" probably isn't going to fly when you're talking about 1st, 2nd tier HSers with the option to go to a decent program and come out with (hopefully) a better economy and a better skill set. If BAL was planning on playing economics (if in fact they are -- we obviously don't have all the facts) then it seems like college juniors would have been the more appropriate focus, no? Shrug. I don't know...still four weeks, so not worth getting riled up. A little disappointing, but there's still time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, the "not going to get what they think they'll get" probably isn't going to fly when you're talking about 1st, 2nd tier HSers with the option to go to a decent program and come out with (hopefully) a better economy and a better skill set. If BAL was planning on playing economics (if in fact they are -- we obviously don't have all the facts) then it seems like college juniors would have been the more appropriate focus, no? Shrug. I don't know...still four weeks, so not worth getting riled up. A little disappointing, but there's still time.

My take, too. There's circumstantial evidence of a bad gambit, but it's hard to say how it will play out.

If we DO fail to sign a handful of these guys - especially our top guys - then I'd rather not spin it, and just take a good, hard look at what we're doing.

We're not in a position to come away w/ half our top picks, no international signings AND early signability picks.

If we thought there was a strong chance that we'd lose out on top-10/20 guys and few-to-no international guys, then we should have gone w/ a different 1st round pick, likely.

That said, nothing definitive yet. And I'm certainly not jumping off the Jordan bandwagon. Just noting talking points for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This current situation is very out of the ordinary for Jordan and the O's. There has got to be more to it. Maybe there was a philosophical shift in this year's draft. Seems like there were more HS picks than recent past. No?

Even if we did sign them where would they play? Aren't the MiL rosters full? Perhaps they wasted picks on people they knew they weren't going to sign (later rounds) in some cases?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This current situation is very out of the ordinary for Jordan and the O's. There has got to be more to it. Maybe there was a philosophical shift in this year's draft. Seems like there were more HS picks than recent past. No?

Even if we did sign them where would they play? Aren't the MiL rosters full? Perhaps they wasted picks on people they knew they weren't going to sign (later rounds) in some cases?

Later rounds (anywhere from mid-teens to early-twenties usually forming the cut-off point) are generally used on organizational filler and long-shot signings. With regards to the latter, you aren't expecting those guys to sign.

If you spend a top 10 round pick on someone, it should be someone who you think you have a good chance of signing. It may not be definite, but you don't pick someone that you know will be a long shot. It seems like BAL maybe picked some guys that are a little more difficult to sign then they expected. The same, perhaps some of these kids have had a change in heart since being selected (though it's probably unlikely that this is true with a large number of them, based on how past drafts have operated).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is most of these kids are being advised by someone who is really out of their league. Pre draft parameters are set then some Bozo gets involved and gives the kid some bad info. Tells ma a lot about integrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is most of these kids are being advised by someone who is really out of their league. Pre draft parameters are set then some Bozo gets involved and gives the kid some bad info. Tells ma a lot about integrity.

Agree. Seems like there was some special focus this year on kids who would sign. I believe there have been comments that we did not follow Givens so closely, but the other top 10 kids should be signing.

Givens, and his agent, need to understand where he was drafted and get in line. If they are waiting for $500k or so, it seems like he will go back in the pool. We just get to pick again - which is fine. I'd really like to get Henry and Berry signed and then see who else wants to play pro ball.

The other Berry signing might indicate that JJ is going to start moving on some other kids drafted in case someone like Givens did not sign. In that case, the $ might not be there for Givens if a couple more kids come on board. It's a shame Givens' agent was not called for the article. If his player is being offered slot, I'd be interested in hearing what the issue is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unreasonable demands by draftees or not I will be very annoyed if the FA:

1-Goes cheap in the first round

2-Doesn't sign any international free agents of note

3-Doesn't sign Givens

4-Doesn't sign a fair percentage of overslot kids

I can understand one of the above happening, maybe two but not three or all four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...