Jump to content

Hobgood Coffey or Matusz


Recommended Posts

For $3.5M, would you prefer to two elite HS pitchers or an elite college pitcher?

One might lean to Matusz because we know how fast he's already moved and how dominant he has pitched, but conceptually I think spreading the risk to two high quality HS pitchers (albeit one with TJ surgery behind him - could be a plus or minus depending on how you look at it).

If Coffey comes all the way back to where he was earlier in 2009, I think I would be a lean to the two HSers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For $3.5M, would you prefer to two elite HS pitchers or an elite college pitcher?

One might lean to Matusz because we know how fast he's already moved and how dominant he has pitched, but conceptually I think spreading the risk to two high quality HS pitchers (albeit one with TJ surgery behind him - could be a plus or minus depending on how you look at it).

If Coffey comes all the way back to where he was earlier in 2009, I think I would be a lean to the two HSers.

Well, regarding Hobgood and Coffey vs Matusz. A college pitcher of Matusz' standing typically has about a 70% shot of making the majors or a 30% fail rate. A consensus mid 1st round high school arm + a consensus late first round or supplemental arm would have a success rate of 63% that one of them makes the majors or a 37% fail rate.

If one wants the pitcher to be at least average then you have a 91% fail rate for the college arm and a 96% fail rate that neither of the high schoolers develop.

Now, these are generic percentages and have issues with different talent evaluation philosophies.

Also, the probability that both high schoolers make it, 4% and <1%, may out weigh the benefit on the other hand.

Again, these are generic percentages. Jordan's group is probably above average in evaluating players, so his percentages probably slightly exceed these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...