Orioles Talk
Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat
21369 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 666 views
-
- 1 reply
- 602 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 22 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 642 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 389 replies
- 48k views
-
- 0 replies
- 719 views
-
- 58 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.6k views
Orioles News and Information |
|
Daily Organizational Boxscores |
Orioles Prospect Information |
Statistics |
-
Posts
-
.thumb.jpg.13113cac3eaf393d496d64a7a1b58a76.jpg)
What you want is perfectly reasonable. But you seem entirely to focused on money. The team needs to work to improve. I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either. They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that. We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont. But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs. I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll. -
This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense. 1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker -
By Aristotelian · Posted
Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2. That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. -
I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback. Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have. That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account. If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now. If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work. I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
-
.thumb.jpg.13113cac3eaf393d496d64a7a1b58a76.jpg)
