Jump to content

Orioles Talk

Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat


21368 topics in this forum

    • 19 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 20 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 23 replies
    • 3.5k views
    • 36 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 285 replies
    • 31.7k views
    • 4 replies
    • 972 views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 40 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.1k views
  1. New Aberdeen Manager

    • 14 replies
    • 3.4k views
    • 29 replies
    • 3.2k views
  2. MLBAM and Tom Tango 1 2

    • 21 replies
    • 2k views
    • 71 replies
    • 5.8k views


  • Posts

    • Other than that, how'd you like the game? Joking aside, that's a comprehensive list.  Thank you. The one trick that I found to get around long lines in bathrooms is to plan a trip to The Sportsbook Cafe (former Dempseys).  It's rarely crowded in there.  Some people spend a lot of time on message boards, but as you can tell, I devote a lot of my time finding restroom options everywhere I go. I'm pee shy. 😙 
    • They’re not really a fly ball heavy pitching staff, though. They were pretty balanced this year, 42.2% GB rate (13th highest) and 38.8% FB rate (16th highest). Not quite as GB heavy as last year, when it was even more substantially in favor of GBs.  But they are a fly ball heavy batting team. They were at 40.5% FB rate (3rd in the league).
    • I don’t disagree with you but $600 million goes a long way.  Especially since you are not building a new structure.   
    • What team doesn't "build from within" to a significant degree?  Going forward are the O's going to build like every Yankeees team since the beginning of free agency?  No.  Are they going to build like the 2021 Orioles - also no.  I think this might be getting close to a semantic discussion over what supplement might mean, at the expense of substance. I don't understand what's behind your last comment.  They were deadline trades.  Do you think Elias and Co. are going to point to them as justification for not spending this offseason?
    • Probably yeah but it's similar IMO.. At one point Matusz was hitting 94 or 95 occasionally which is about where Povich sits and Matusz had a nice change up. He just grooved too many pitches and his velocity dropped off as his career progressed.
×
×
  • Create New...