Jump to content

Sometimes Your Best Moves are the Ones You Don't Make


brianod

Recommended Posts

Nobody is acting like that.

Obviously I am being hyperbolic, but there would have been a relatively significant price involved and I think some people are ignoring that. If there wasn't, he would be playing elsewhere. Maybe in Baltimore, but maybe in some of the other cities that needed a guy like that. We were certainly not the only ones. Yet he is still in San Diego.

I like Headley a lot, and he would have been a great fit in our lineup. But I question whether there was ever a legitimate chance to make a deal. Therefore I can't assign fault to the front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Obviously I am being hyperbolic, but there would have been a relatively significant price involved and I think some people are ignoring that. If there wasn't, he would be playing elsewhere. Maybe in Baltimore, but maybe in some of the other cities that needed a guy like that. We were certainly not the only ones. Yet he is still in San Diego.

I like Headley a lot, and he would have been a great fit in our lineup. But I question whether there was ever a legitimate chance to make a deal. Therefore I can't assign fault to the front office.

Honestly, I don't know any pro-Headley person who isn't prefacing their position with "I would have been fine with the rumored price (of Arrieta and Matusz)." And if it turns out the price was Machado and Bundy, again, no pro-Headley person would still want him. So right now we just talk about what we know, or think we know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't know any pro-Headley person who isn't prefacing their position with "I would have been fine with the rumored price (of Arrieta and Matusz)." And if it turns out the price was Machado and Bundy, again, no pro-Headley person would still want him. So right now we just talk about what we know, or think we know.

I am certainly pro-Headley, but (and I am sorry for repeating myself) the fact that he is still playing in lovely San Diego leads me to believe that they might not have wanted to move him in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am certainly pro-Headley, but (and I am sorry for repeating myself) the fact that he is still playing in lovely San Diego leads me to believe that they might not have wanted to move him in the first place.

The rumor from roch was that San Diego wanted Arrieta and Matusz for him. That's the rumor we are going off of here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am certainly pro-Headley, but (and I am sorry for repeating myself) the fact that he is still playing in lovely San Diego leads me to believe that they might not have wanted to move him in the first place.
The rumor from roch was that San Diego wanted Arrieta and Matusz for him. That's the rumor we are going off of here.

I don't think you can draw that conclusion, since the opposite is equally plausible: that we weren't willing to pay the asking price of Arrieta and Matusz. And that's the only rumor I've actually heard (from Roch).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor from roch was that San Diego wanted Arrieta and Matusz for him. That's the rumor we are going off of here.

I understand that, but even if we decided to not to make that deal, there was not another team that could have made a similar proposal? It was not just us that could have really used a player like that.

1. I don't take the rumor as gospel and 2. I just don't know if they ever wanted to trade him.

Anyways, I have to get back to work and I am just repeating myself at this point. I just don't know if there was a deal there to be made, so I can't really fault the FO.

I am just happy that it is late August and football does not matter to me. It has been a while and it is a nice feeling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other aspect of a Headley trade is the years we would have him. Is two years of Headley worth Jake, Matusz and Hoes? Headley is easily better then Machado now but will he be in 2 years time?

Again, it's not Headley vs Machado. The bolded is a totally legitimate question. I think the value would be very close, especially with Hoes in there. But Headley vs Machado is a strawman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, it's not Headley vs Machado.

I know this keeps coming up, but for 2012 it very much is. There is no way Manny comes up if we have Headley. It's not that there couldn't be a position for him, it's that DD and Buck wouldn't have the need. That is key. They went to MM out of need (defensive 3b, mostly), and an evaluation that it wouldn't hurt his development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, it's not Headley vs Machado. The bolded is a totally legitimate question. I think the value would be very close, especially with Hoes in there. But Headley vs Machado is a strawman.

You are assuming that Machado can play 2nd and you don't have any proof of this. Because some players can play both positions, it doesn't follow that all players can and it certainly doesn't follow that Machado could play 2nd immediately. The comparison is apt because if you had Headley, Machado woulod be in the minors, not playing 2b for the major league team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this keeps coming up, but for 2012 it very much is. There is no way Manny comes up if we have Headley. It's not that there couldn't be a position for him, it's that DD and Buck wouldn't have the need. That is key. They went to MM out of need (defensive 3b, mostly), and an evaluation that it wouldn't hurt his development.

I'm not gonna do this all again, but if you think we can't find a spot for an athletic, versatile 800+ OPS bat in the lineup even with Manny at 3rd, you're nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Blanton is 0-3 with a 7.71 ERA and a 1.76 WHIP since joining the Dodgers.

In his first outing after being acquired by the Yankees, Derek Lowe pitched 4 innings of 2-hit, shutout ball to secure a win.

In his last 2 outings, he has pitched 3 innings, given up 7 hits, a walk, and 2 runs.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=lowede01&t=p&year=2012

More significantly, his numbers overall for the last 3 years had been severely declining, as were his numbers in this season alone after a nice start in the first 2 months of the year:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/lowede01.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matusz is now being turned into a reliever. Arrieta has been bad in AAA. Headley would be the 2nd best player on the team if they would have traded for him.

This team would be much better with Headley on it regardless of what position he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...