Jump to content

Change to HoF Voting


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hall of Fame announces changes in voting for recently retired players, reducing length of stay on ballot from maximum of 15 to 10 years.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">July 26, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Three candidates currently on ballot in years 10-15 will be grandfathered in and be considered full 15 years: Mattingly, Trammell, Lee Smith</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">July 26, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Now is this an attempt to unclutter the ballot?

Or is it an attempt to make it more difficult for those with a PED tainted past to get in?

One thing is for sure, there are going to a number of folks (Edgar Martinez) that have strong cases that won't get in.

I would also say this hurts Mussina's chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition, the Hall will now require an Internet registration of the approximately 625 eligible members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America and those voters will be notified about a specific code of conduct regarding the handling of that ballot. Voters will be asked to formally agree to a stipulation that their ballot is non-transferable with a penalty of permanently losing that vote.

So no more selling your vote to Deadspin but it is fine to turn in a blank ballot or only name Jim Morris.

Typical. I expected to see a change of that nature to the voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible decision, doesn't make any sense. Raines' and Trammell's chances just dropped to zero. Blyleven never would've stood a chance. What problem is this supposed to solve?

It is going to be interesting to watch the SABR-community's Tim Raines lobbying in view of this news (I count myself part of this). After the eventual success of Blyleven, I felt confident Raines would eventually get the enshrinement he so well deserves, but this muddies the water considerably. I would expect the intensity of the tone of Raines proponent appeals to spike now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to be interesting to watch the SABR-community's Tim Raines lobbying in view of this news (I count myself part of this). After the eventual success of Blyleven, I felt confident Raines would eventually get the enshrinement he so well deserves, but this muddies the water considerably. I would expect the intensity of the tone of Raines proponent appeals to spike now.

Maybe some year in the future, the Veterans committee will be lead by advanced statistically minded folks. Not. TWTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnit, I was hoping you were a big hall guy weams.

I don't think this will have all that much of an effect, really, except for a few names already on the ballot. The BBWAA body is gradually getting better and moreso the Veteran's Committee will get fresher names to consider for their modern-era vote. Sooner or later the guys that we think have a decent HOF case will get in. I just hope they're alive to accept their plaque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnit, I was hoping you were a big hall guy weams.

I don't think this will have all that much of an effect, really, except for a few names already on the ballot. The BBWAA body is gradually getting better and moreso the Veteran's Committee will get fresher names to consider for their modern-era vote. Sooner or later the guys that we think have a decent HOF case will get in. I just hope they're alive to accept their plaque.

It kills Martinez and Raines and hurts Mussina.

Has the revamped vet committee put in any modern players yet? I don't think they have.

Edit- I see they did add Santo in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...