Jump to content

Hardball Times: Tommy John


weams

Recommended Posts

Has no one read Dr. Andrews paper that he put out in the last year? He pinned the TJS epidemic nearly entirely on childhood arm abuse. Kids are throwing all year with no breaks. Once Junior High baseball is over, they go into traveling baseball; once that is over they go into club baseball etc. Kids never give their arms a chance to heal. In some cases you can't blame them. If they skip showcases or clubs they miss out on national exposure which hurts them in the draft and with scholarships. One solution that has been suggested is only allowing kids to pitch for either school or club, not both. However, this type of thing would require school and club coaches to work together and more times than not they're both out for themselves and their teams. Long story short, even if by some miracle kid's baseball was reformed today, those kids who are already in high school have likely put their arms through so much abuse that we wouldn't see a noticeable improvement for 5+ years in MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's the velocity. The ligaments and tendons can't handle the strain. Throwing a ball is an inherently unsafe endeavor.

Disagree----it's the torque applied---hitters can handle velocity.

We threw way more years ago--fought arm fatigue without knowing what it was--but had far,

far less structural damage issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has no one read Dr. Andrews paper that he put out in the last year? He pinned the TJS epidemic nearly entirely on childhood arm abuse. Kids are throwing all year with no breaks. Once Junior High baseball is over, they go into traveling baseball; once that is over they go into club baseball etc. Kids never give their arms a chance to heal. In some cases you can't blame them. If they skip showcases or clubs they miss out on national exposure which hurts them in the draft and with scholarships. One solution that has been suggested is only allowing kids to pitch for either school or club, not both. However, this type of thing would require school and club coaches to work together and more times than not they're both out for themselves and their teams. Long story short, even if by some miracle kid's baseball was reformed today, those kids who are already in high school have likely put their arms through so much abuse that we wouldn't see a noticeable improvement for 5+ years in MLB.

I think there is a huge abuse of kids in all sports by many well intended adults. Many kids become one sport specialists before they are 11 year old. Soccer, basketball have become year round sports in most areas of the country for all age levels. Youth hockey leagues scheduling tournaments beginning on Friday which requires kids missing days of school. Kids playing 3-45 minute hockey games in an 8 hour time frame. I am pretty certain similar situations exist for baseball where the climate allows. When I coached LL baseball 20 years ago, our league did not allow pitchers to throw curve balls on the advise of an orthopedic surgeon. It was also believed that the majority of youth coaches did not have the expertise to teach it properly. Hence, the kids were strictly fastball and change-up type pitches. I recently went to a fall developmental LL game and the opposing 10 year old pitcher was throwing curves and other assorted pitches to 8 year olds. The kid had a good enough fastball to get kids out, but still was encouraged by coaches to use the curve regularly. I know times change and parents want their kids to excel and have sport opportunities, but common sense and the realization that the stress put on developing joints seems to be lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fascinating situation, at least to me. The most fascinating thing about this situation is that we usually advance and get smarter as time goes on. It seems to me that we are getting worse at handling pitchers despite the millions spent studying the situation. Because of the failure to properly handle pitchers health, I'm to the point where I wouldn't sign any high priced pitchers in free agency.

I think they are doing much better in the aspects that used to kill pitchers. But the unintended consequences were that everyone figured out that pitchers could go max-effort all the time with the more careful handling. I think that pitchers would be far healthier today if they paced for nine innings like it was 1975 but actually only threw 5-6 innings like today. But they adapted and now everyone throws like they’re a reliever, so the starters get hurt just like always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree----it's the torque applied---hitters can handle velocity.

We threw way more years ago--fought arm fatigue without knowing what it was--but had far,

far less structural damage issues.

I don't think that's exactly true. And to the extent it is, it's because pitchers were taught to pace (or something like "you'll never have control or last nine throwing that hard.") But you can't put the genie back in the bottle. Everyone knows you can throw max-effort and be a better pitcher right up until the ligament snaps. You will be worse pitching at 80%. But healthier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...