Jump to content

SS Chris Owings, Trade Target?


MASNPalmer

Recommended Posts

MLBTradeRumors.com highlights that the D-Backs are considering shopping SS/2B Chris Owings. I'm honestly shocked a franchise in rebuilding mode would consider this, but I suppose it's not TOO surprising given their inclination to trade Bauer a couple years back.

It's rare to find buy low candidates in the middle infield (though Hardy was one -- and we all know how that's worked out), let alone with the pedigree and skill set Owings possesses. First round pick back in 2009 out of high school, he has good speed, moderate pop, and a bat that should definitely stick in the bigs. He was in the ROY of the year talk last year before fading after needing surgery to repair his left shoulder. Missed most of ST this year and has been in and out of the lineup since the D-Backs rotate Hill, Ahmed, and Owings around. So with that he's slashing just .235 w/ 3 HR and 12 SB.

But last year as a 22yr old he hit .261 w/ 6 HR and 8 SB in just 91 MLB games, good for a 1.9 WAR in little over half a season. He's 5 years YOUNGER than Flaherty and could provide good speed, flexibility in the MI, and insurance for Hardy for his eventual (if not already happening) decline.

I think the power is there as he gets older to consistently hit ~15 HR and steal 20 bags while hitting north of .255ish and play both SS and 2B. What would it take? Anyone else interested? He's cheap and cost controlled through 2020. I'd imagine with all the position players the D Backs have (Lamb, Thomas, Ahmed, Inciarte, Hill, Peralta, etc) that the D-Backs are looking for arms. Does a Wright for Owings swap get the conversation started?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not what the O's need right now. They have Manny, Hardy, Schoop and Flaherty. They need to add a bat in the outfield or a starting pitcher. I don't see the fit.

No concern at all that Hardy is hitting like a pitcher after an offensive decline last year? I think he'd be a decent buy low target that could be a good backup option and potentially a starter if Hardy continues to lose it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No concern at all that Hardy is hitting like a pitcher after an offensive decline last year? I think he'd be a decent buy low target that could be a good backup option and potentially a starter if Hardy continues to lose it.

Arizona is not looking to trade him to a team looking for a utility infielder. They would consider a trade to a team looking for a starting shortstop and willing to pay a corresponding price. They aren't dumping Owings... they are looking for maximum return or they will keep him. This is a non-starter for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...