Jump to content

Parra to the Orioles (Done Deal)


TonySoprano

Who Would You Trade For?  

58 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Would You Trade For?

    • Gerardo Parra - 2 month rental
    • Ben Revere
    • Someone Else (Please name them in the comments)
    • Nobody. Not much worth it on the market.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 456
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This guy looks like he could step in at one of the corner OF spots. And in return we're giving up a guy who IMO has a ceiling of being a back end rotation starter. I know Parra has been much better this year than in the rest of his long MLB career. But I'm OK with giving up a future reliever / back end guy (tops).

"Back end guy" could still be extremely valuable over 4-5 years under team control. Think about all that Miguel has contributed since 2012. You would give that up for 2 months of Parra? Maybe for Upton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Back end guy" could still be extremely valuable over 4-5 years under team control. Think about all that Miguel has contributed since 2012. You would give that up for 2 months of Parra? Maybe for Upton.

This. Exactly. If he had another year, possibly.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always liked Parra. Strikes me as sort of player we were hoping Snider or Parmalee or Reimold or DeAza or Pearce or Lough or .... could turn into being roughly equivalent to. I'd prefer more of an impact bat if we're going to trade anyone with a chance of being even remotely useful in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's have Mike Wright, Wilson and Davies at AAA. That is probably the best depth the O's have to trade from. Any one of them probably will not get Cespedes or Justin Upton but I would not be surprised if one of them would bring back Parra.

The O's need to add one or two hitters. Parra could help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always liked Parra. Strikes me as sort of player we were hoping Snider or Parmalee or Reimold or DeAza or Pearce or Lough or .... could turn into being roughly equivalent to. I'd prefer more of an impact bat if we're going to trade anyone with a chance of being even remotely useful in the future.

Yes. Rich man's Lough is not enough to justify a guy who could easily be a MLB starting pitcher. This is Ed Rod all over again but for a much lower return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was afraid of something like this by DD. I am not convinced that Davies' stuff translates in the majors but we haven't even tried.

I am standing behind the fact we should be sellers and this is a bad move for the long term benefit of the franchise.

Just one guy's opinion.

We have too many holes this year. This isn't going to do much by itself.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed. We shouldn't be dealing any of our top five prospects for a rental when our minor league systems is so lacking in depth. Davies is definitely a guy that could help us for next season and possibly be our fifth starter on opening day. If he was down in Single A it would be a different story.

Bundy, Harvey, Reyes, Sisco, and Davies are the guys I would not want to move for a rental. I would feel comfortable moving any of the others. Walker/Mancini are redundant and Alvarez is a 27 year old "prospect" that struggles to keep his OBP above .300 in Triple A. Wright and Givens are destined to be bullpen arms so they are expendable too IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's have Mike Wright, Wilson and Davies at AAA. That is probably the best depth the O's have to trade from. Any one of them probably will not get Cespedes or Justin Upton but I would not be surprised if one of them would bring back Parra.

The O's need to add one or two hitters. Parra could help.

Help but it won't be enough so why do the trade? If we had a deeper farm system, I would completely agree but we don't. This team at best will hobble into the playoffs and be eliminated early.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's play a trivia game. Who are these players?

Player A- .245/.311/.399, 94 OPS+, 94 wRC+, 14 HRs, 54 RBIs, 56 runs scored, 43 walks, 127 strikeouts

Player B- .274/.326/.395, 94 OPS+, 90 wRC+, 9 HRs, 51 RBIs, 58 runs scored, 40 walks, 102 strikeouts

Player A is the 162 game average numbers for Travis Snider. Player B is the 162 game averages for Gerardo Parra before this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was somewhat confident that Parra would continue fairly close to his current .884 OPS level, I might reluctantly do it. But I'm not confident of that at all. Thumbs down.

Points to a case of buying too high. Parra's career #'s say he is closer to a Travis Snider offensively than he is a Gerardo Parra from 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...