Jump to content

CBS Sports: Buck Showalter and Pitching


25 Nuggets

Recommended Posts

Source: Buck Showalter still one of the best at running a pitching staff

Intro: "Orioles don't have an ace, Buck is awesome, omg bbq."

Don't let starters face the opposing lineup too many times in a given game.

When you don't have an ace on the staff, it's wise to be especially mindful of the "Times Through the Order" penalty. That's the measurable degradation of pitcher performance that occurs when a lineup sees a given starter multiple times in a game, especially the third time or more. It's a very real phenomenon. Managers regularly ignore this, of course, and sometimes it's out of necessity (you don't want to run your bullpen in the ground by late June, for instance). However, when the bullpen is able to carry the weight and when the starter of note is willing to accept such limitations, it's wise to keep starters from facing a particular batter three or more times in an outing.

This season, 28.8 percent of the average AL starter's batters faced have come during the third or fourth time through the order. For the Orioles this season, that figure is 26.8 percent. That doesn't sound like a huge difference but scaled to a near-full season, it matters. To be sure, this isn't always a managerial decision at work, as the pitcher's effectiveness of course has a say in how long he stays in the game. However, this effect surely isn't lost on a manager like Showalter.

Stretch your relievers out.

The O's rank seventh in the AL with 361 bullpen innings. However, they rank next to last in the AL with 301 relief appearances. That's a serious disconnect, to say the least. What's at work is Showalter's preference to stretch his relievers out. For instance, among AL teams only the Yankees have recorded more multi-inning relief outings this season, and the O's lead the AL in relief outings that span more than three outs and outs per relief outing.

Keep relievers fresh by spacing out appearances.

Orioles relievers pitch more than most, as that innings total will tell you, but Showalter keeps the workload manageable by not calling on them as often as you'd think, as the games relieved total will tell you. Here's another way to think about: The Orioles this season have logged the fewest relief outings on zero days' rest of any AL team, and it's not close. They have 45 such appearances in 2015. Next are the Yankees with 56. The AL average this season is 74. The Tigers have the most with 105. The modern relief playbook is usually set roles, one-inning outings, frequent appearances. Showalter's turned all of that upside down while at the same time leaning on his relief corps. The results have been promising: Baltimore ranks fifth in the AL in bullpen runs/game and second in WAR.

Give the most important innings to your best relievers.

This one's not hard. The Orioles' two best relievers this season have been Zach Britton (1.88 ERA/1.88 FIP) and Darren O'Day (1.19 ERA/2.56 FIP). When it comes to Leverage Index, which measures the average importance of a reliever's innings (e.g., ninth inning, one-run lead is high-leverage; ninth-inning, 11-2 game, is low-leverage), we find that the O's most critical relief innings have been worked by Britton and O'Day. Next in the leverage line? Brad Brach: 2.51 ERA, 3.14 FIP. Showalter knows how to match up his best relievers with the most critical spots.

And that's how you put your team on target for the playoffs, again, despite an on-paper rotation that seems anything but capable of such a feat.

Is the article on to something here? If so, do you agree with the strategy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure Buck's intentionally bringing the starters out before they face the lineup 3 or more times. I just think our starters are notoriously bad at going deep into games..so their pitch counts are usually high and that results in them coming out faster. If Buck had his way, they'd be going deeper. It's just a function of mediocre starting rotation not Buck Showalter, IMHO.

As for the bullpen, the writer is correct that Buck stretches out his relievers. Now, you can do that when they're effective. Even Brian Matusz who is really a LOOGY by his splits...has faced just as many or more RHB than LHB in his career as a reliever.

This all comes back to our starting rotation being lackluster. They don't go deep into games and they oftentimes put the team in a position where they're behind. So Buck has to put in relievers. But if he was pitching his relievers many times in a game as opposed to stretching them out you run into 2 scenarios:

1. More relievers in 1 game mean possibility of one of them being ineffective

2. Relievers constantly being up in the bullpen warming up and/or coming in multiple days in a row means those arms are going to be burned through during the course of a marathon season.

I think Buck has always been very good at managing a bullpen and ensuring they're not overworked. So there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is masterful at managing his bullpen. As to the starters, I think he has gotten better each year as he has learned the capabilities of his individual pitchers. Overall, he's excellent at managing a pitching staff IMO. It sure would be nice to have an ace, though -- it would make his job much easier!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...