Jump to content

Would you fire Duquette?


LookitsPuck

Would you fire Duquette?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you fire Duquette?

    • Yes
      26
    • No
      74


Recommended Posts

webbrick2010 was against re-signing Hardy, so therefore he is going to take JJ's poor season as conclusive proof that he is now a sub-replacement player.

Whether we are competitive next year or not depends on whether we get some bounceback from Tillman, Gonzalez and Gausman. It's abut that simple, though Duquette does have a lot of work to do to fill the holes at 1B, corner OF and DH and one SP spot.

All very true. A lot of things need to go right. Just like they went wrong this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply
webbrick2010 was against re-signing Hardy, so therefore he is going to take JJ's poor season as conclusive proof that he is now a sub-replacement player.

Whether we are competitive next year or not depends on whether we get some bounceback from Tillman, Gonzalez and Gausman. It's abut that simple, though Duquette does have a lot of work to do to fill the holes at 1B, corner OF and DH and one SP spot.

Some bounce back won't cut it. They have enough coming off to get a MOR guy. I'd say TOR but I don't have any hopes that they're going after Price. It is the pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think so -- Posey was floating a $10 MM bonus number the night before the draft (which is why he dropped to SanFran; Tampa very much wanted him but couldn't spend $10 MM and didn't want to risk not signing a 1st overall pick).

Couldn't you say the same thing about Wieters when the Orioles drafted him? He had Boras as his agent and wanted a huge bonus as well. Those demands scared off the Pirates and might have scared off the Cubs as well. The Pirates passing on Wieters actually hurt the Orioles in the long run. They would have much better off with Posey and Detwiler than Wieters and Matusz.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't you say the same thing about Wieters when the Orioles drafted him? He had Boras as his agent and wanted a huge bonus as well. Those demands scared off the Pirates and might have scared off the Cubs as well. The Pirates passing on Wieters actually hurt the Orioles in the long run. They would have much better off with Posey and Detwiler than Wieters and Matusz.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why would a team that refused to sign Wieters then go and select another high asking price player the following year?

It doesn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't you say the same thing about Wieters when the Orioles drafted him? He had Boras as his agent and wanted a huge bonus as well. Those demands scared off the Pirates and might have scared off the Cubs as well. The Pirates passing on Wieters actually hurt the Orioles in the long run. They would have much better off with Posey and Detwiler than Wieters and Matusz.

In a perfect world the Cubs would have taken Wieters and the O's could have drafted Josh Vitters, who would then have been available. Or failing that they could have taken Daniel Moskos after the Pirates took Wieters. That would have been a sure injection of playoff glory, since their combined games played in 2015 is zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the Cubs would have taken Wieters and the O's could have drafted Josh Vitters, who would then have been available. Or failing that they could have taken Daniel Moskos after the Pirates took Wieters. That would have been a sure injection of playoff glory, since their combined games played in 2015 is zero.

I was worried on draft day that if Moskos was still on the board PA would intercede and force the O's to take him over Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a team that refused to sign Wieters then go and select another high asking price player the following year?

It doesn't make sense.

You aren't following me. If the Pirates had drafted Wieters, he wouldn't have been available when the Orioles made their selection. They would have been forced to draft another player most likely a pitcher. In the following year, Posey was available when the Orioles made their pick. I believe there's a good chance the Orioles would have selected him without Wieters in the fold. With Wieters in the organization, it made little sense to draft Posey although I know some people on this board wanted to draft him anyway because he was such a great talent. Anyway, having Wieters fall to them probably prevented the Orioles from drafting Posey so the Pirates decision actually hurt them in the long run.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the Cubs would have taken Wieters and the O's could have drafted Josh Vitters, who would then have been available. Or failing that they could have taken Daniel Moskos after the Pirates took Wieters. That would have been a sure injection of playoff glory, since their combined games played in 2015 is zero.

I would take Posey with Vitters, Moskos or anybody else over Wieters and Matusz any day of the week. Posey by himself will end up providing significantly more value than the other two players.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You aren't following me. If the Pirates had drafted Wieters, he wouldn't have been available when the Orioles made their selection. They would have been forced to draft another player most likely a pitcher. In the following year, Posey was available when the Orioles made their pick. I believe there's a good chance the Orioles would have selected him without Wieters in the fold. With Wieters in the organization, it made little sense to draft Posey although I know some people on this board wanted to draft him anyway because he was such a great talent. Anyway, having Wieters fall to them probably prevented the Orioles from drafting Posey so the Pirates decision actually hurt them in the long run.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think you can it is anything close to a lock that the O's would have selected Posey.

Was he even viewed as a lock to stay at catcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take Posey with Vitters, Moskos or anybody else over Wieters and Matusz any day of the week. Posey by himself will end up providing significantly more value than the other two players.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well if we are playing revisionist history then I would have taken Trout over Hobgood!

So there!

It is still September and we are already talking about almost decade old draft decisions by other teams.

Going to be a long, long offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some bounce back won't cut it. They have enough coming off to get a MOR guy. I'd say TOR but I don't have any hopes that they're going after Price. It is the pitching.

Hey at least one poster not in denial.

This last place team minus O'day, Chen, Wieters, and Davis can have all the bounce you want from Tillman, Gonzalez, and Gausman and still lose 90 games. Tillman and Gonzalez have track records (they are not that good). We need don't have the budget to sign the quality and quantity of FA's needed to get back to the playoffs.

I only asked if folks thought DD could lead a re-build. I don't, problem is DD and the majority of the posters on this board don't even recognize that it is the only path back to the playoffs for this franchise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey at least one poster not in denial.

This last place team minus O'day, Chen, Wieters, and Davis can have all the bounce you want from Tillman, Gonzalez, and Gausman and still lose 90 games. Tillman and Gonzalez have track records (they are not that good). We need don't have the budget to sign the quality and quantity of FA's needed to get back to the playoffs.

I only asked if folks thought DD could lead a re-build. I don't, problem is DD and the majority of the posters on this board don't even recognize that it is the only path back to the playoffs for this franchise

Anytime you have a core with a 6 win and a 5 win player it can be built around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Santana/Aybar offer was at the 2006 trade deadline, not on Andy's watch. And I don't recall a Seattle proposed deal for Tejada. I think Andy did pretty well with the Houston trade, though that was probably only his fourth best trade for the Orioles.

Could well be. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...