Jump to content

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?


weams

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I suppose.  Baseball rarely goes and tackles a problem head-on.  The issue is pace of play and lack of action.  So they focus on time of game instead.  7 inning doubleheaders, the runner on second in extras, possibly expanding the strike zone. 

I guess they can't get consensus on how to cure the actual problems, so they try to make the patient comfortable by treating some symptoms.

It does appear they've deadened the ball a bit, HRs are off.  But they need to deaden it more, make bats bigger and heavier, and parks bigger.  And continue to pare down the number of pitchers you can have on the roster. And move the mound back to 63' or 64'.

Start with making the parks bigger and the ball less juiced. All else might fall into place if its not so (relatively) easy to hit a home run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I wouldn't be surprised if MLB told the umps that this is the year where nothing really matters, let's see what happens when we expand the zone.

K rate is almost identical to last year at about 8.8.  But the batting average so far is the lowest (.230) in 149 years of organized pro baseball history.  Seven points behind 1968, when Yaz won the batting title at .301.

Interesting. I haven't looked it up, but I wonder what's the HR rate compare to last year? I also would like to know the average game time (minus the 7-inning games) vs last year. BTW, I'm not asking you look it up, just wondering aloud.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, joelala said:

Start with making the parks bigger and the ball less juiced. All else might fall into place if its not so (relatively) easy to hit a home run. 

Making the bats bigger is pretty key.  If only the largest, strongest players can play the max bat speed all the time game then contact will almost have to become a bigger part of the game.  75 or 100 years ago there was a class of player who was typically 5' 10", 175 pounds, swung a 40 ounce bat, and mostly just worked the count for walks and flaring singles, trying to put the ball in play. Bat speed was more of a concept than a reality for them.  Imagine a bunch of Tony Gwynns, just not necessarily hitting .350.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Interesting. I haven't looked it up, but I wonder what's the HR rate compare to last year? I also would like to know the average game time (minus the 7-inning games) vs last year. BTW, I'm not asking you look it up, just wondering aloud.

 

Homers are down from 1.39 to 1.19 per game (still super high, third highest ever).  It would be a bit of work to separate out the short games on game time, but the overall average is only three minutes off last year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Making the bats bigger is pretty key.  If only the largest, strongest players can play the max bat speed all the time game then contact will almost have to become a bigger part of the game.  75 or 100 years ago there was a class of player who was typically 5' 10", 175 pounds, swung a 40 ounce bat, and mostly just worked the count for walks and flaring singles, trying to put the ball in play. Bat speed was more of a concept than a reality for them.  Imagine a bunch of Tony Gwynns, just not necessarily hitting .350.

Interesting. I like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another idea that I don't know that I've heard brought up would be shrinking gloves.  The whole "striking out is horrible, putting the ball in play at all costs" theme was grounded in the era when players wore stubby little gloves.  You got a huge advantage putting the ball in play because fielding percentages were .930 and 8" or 10" gloves effectively reduced fielding range.  I would be open to reducing the max size of fielder's gloves by half an inch a year for a while and studying the effects.

Part of the ball in play thing in 1910 was the crappy state of groundskeeping.  But I doubt anyone would buy into making the playing surface at OPACY look more like your local Little League field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Another idea that I don't know that I've heard brought up would be shrinking gloves.  The whole "striking out is horrible, putting the ball in play at all costs" theme was grounded in the era when players wore stubby little gloves.  You got a huge advantage putting the ball in play because fielding percentages were .930 and 8" or 10" gloves effectively reduced fielding range.  I would be open to reducing the max size of fielder's gloves by half an inch a year for a while and studying the effects.

Part of the ball in play thing in 1910 was the crappy state of groundskeeping.  But I doubt anyone would buy into making the playing surface at OPACY look more like your local Little League field.

Yes, if there is one thing I enjoy about baseball it is watching fielders screw up plays on defense.  More of that please.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I haven't watch a lot of the games, but the ones I've seen it was so obvious I thought maybe they'd stopped using the tracking systems.  Many pitches 6" out of the zone being called strikes.

Oh well, just add yet another to the long list of asterisks to this barely even virtual season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes, if there is one thing I enjoy about baseball it is watching fielders screw up plays on defense.  More of that please.

It's hard to screw up on defense when you stand in right field daydreaming while balls fly over the fence, or are never made contact with at all.

Strikeout rate has almost doubled since '81.  If the rate of increase stays constant then by 2060 there will be only about 10 outs in play per team per game.  At that point does fielding even matter?  Just put nine Giambis in the field and you're good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2020 at 1:10 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Embarrasingly bad and then the quick toss after that major screw up? They need a system that allows a manager to challenge a terrible call through the electronic strikezone. These umpires just can't keep up anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Embarrasingly bad and then the quick toss after that major screw up? They need a system that allows a manager to challenge a terrible call through the electronic strikezone. These umpires just can't keep up anymore.

That call was all about the catcher's reaction instead of where the ball actually was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...