Jump to content

Would trading Mancini be the best option now?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

1. He doesn't have the skills to be a COF, if he could have, don't you think they would have already been doing that in the minors, which is what the minors are for.

2. Do you truly believe the team really would have wasted 100 million on Davis, if Mancini could play a good firstbase?

3. He has been blocked, because they brought in big leaguers, like Pedro, why? Maybe, they were in a playoff push and felt he wasn't ready?

4. He did hit well, keep in mind, it was only 15 Plate appearances.

I really hope he plays well and lands a spot on the 25 man roster and can contributed. I just trying to keep perspective, there has been no much hype on this kid  by some, if he fails to win the triple crown, they will be diasppointed.

Not really by me.... If he gets a legitimate chance to play and fizzles fine.

if he is traded for another guy that is a comparable value and had a good career elsewhere fine.

Buck will likely bury him on the bench due to his love fest for everyday veteran players and sporadic playing time will hurt his potential. 

 

Thats why id prefer he go to AAA at this point.

 

Like I said the part that would anger me is tearing him for a 1year rental  with minimal tread left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Not really by me.... If he gets a legitimate chance to play and fizzles fine.

if he is traded for another guy that is a comparable value and had a good career elsewhere fine.

Buck will likely bury him on the bench due to his love fest for everyday veteran players and sporadic playing time will hurt his potential. 

 

Thats why id prefer he go to AAA at this point.

 

Like I said the part that would anger me is tearing him for a 1year rental  with minimal tread left.

Given the statement by DD about not much of a reason for Mancini to go back to AAA this season, not sure, if going back to AAA would happen.

Its just hard to find a roster spot for somebody that is limited to part-time DH role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Given the statement by DD about not much of a reason for Mancini to go back to AAA this season, not sure, if going back to AAA would happen.

Its just hard to find a roster spot for somebody that is limited to part-time DH role.

DD is always saying stuff like this in the offseason before he has made his moves.   Every year he suggests that one of our minor leaguers is a good candidate to fill one of our roster spots, then he makes a move that suggests he was just saying things to keep the fan base from getting frantic.   In Mancini's case, I think he's a decent bet to be solid but not great major league hitter, but DD decided not to take the risk.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

DD is always saying stuff like this in the offseason before he has made his moves.   Every year he suggests that one of our minor leaguers is a good candidate to fill one of our roster spots, then he makes a move that suggests he was just saying things to keep the fan base from getting frantic.   In Mancini's case, I think he's a decent bet to be solid but not great major league hitter, but DD decided not to take the risk.    

Mancini is this year's Tyler Wilson. He has proven himself at AAA, but that does not mean he has what it takes to succeed in the big leagues. I was a big fan of Tyler Wilson but DD probably made the right call to bring him along slowly. I would rather see him getting ABs and working on defense in AAA than getting stiff on the bench. Then he will be a phone call away should something happen to Davis, Smith, or Kim (which will likely happen at some point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mancini is this year's Tyler Wilson. He has proven himself at AAA, but that does not mean he has what it takes to succeed in the big leagues. 

I think Mancini has way more upside than Tyler Wilson.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mancini is this year's Tyler Wilson. He has proven himself at AAA, but that does not mean he has what it takes to succeed in the big leagues. I was a big fan of Tyler Wilson but DD probably made the right call to bring him along slowly. I would rather see him getting ABs and working on defense in AAA than getting stiff on the bench. Then he will be a phone call away should something happen to Davis, Smith, or Kim (which will likely happen at some point).

Maybe Tyler will develop a trick pitch at some point in his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weams said:

Maybe Tyler will develop a trick pitch at some point in his career. 

Tyler would be fine if he could keep the ball down in the zone when he wants to.   Thigh high pitches aren't going to cut it with his stuff.   Sometimes he's sharp, sometimes he's not, and he simply can't get away with it when he's not.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think Mancini has way more upside than Tyler Wilson.    

Maybe. They both look like slightly better than an average AAA player right now. Harbor Park is hard to hit in, but the list of recent players who've hit as well as or better than Mancini includes Parmalee, Weeks, Hoes, Valencia, Canzler, Clevenger, Ishikawa, Ford, Waring...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tyler would be fine if he could keep the ball down in the zone when he wants to.   Thigh high pitches aren't going to cut it with his stuff.   Sometimes he's sharp, sometimes he's not, and he simply can't get away with it when he's not.     

It's not like he's a command and control guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mancini only has more upside than Wilson because he hasn't really played in the majors yet. He has as much upside as Wilson had before he got his shot. It's pretty clear that Mancini can succeed against AAA but has some limitations offensively and defensively. It's possible that Mancini will have more success, and in general I am in favor of giving young and cheap players a shot. Personally I would have gone for a full time RF rather than Trumbo, but at least they didn't overpay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Given the statement by DD about not much of a reason for Mancini to go back to AAA this season, not sure, if going back to AAA would happen.

Its just hard to find a roster spot for somebody that is limited to part-time DH role.

I did see where Buck or DD mentioned trying him in the OF during spring training. 

 

Seems  s like it should've been done last year at AAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2017 at 3:27 PM, Frobby said:

I tend to agree with others that other teams' interest in Mancini is more likely to be based on his 2,000 previous plate appearances as a professional than the 70-80 PA he might get in spring training. I don't mean that his performance in ST is completely irrelevant, but it's only a very minor factor.    

Nick Markakis says hello.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Only ones I’d look to extend now are Gunnar, and maybe Holliday or Basallo. Premium defensive positions and young enough to not worry about going past their primes. Westburg would need to be a team friendly deal as he’s older and I wonder if we’re getting his best years now. 
    • I've never played in a beer league software league.  Is it drunk programming?  Sounds fun. Don't a lot of beer leagues limit the amount of Homeruns you can hit? With the way pitching and defense is currently don't all team struggle to score when they don't hit HR?  Seven players hit .300.  It's pretty hard to string together three hits in an inning with what pitching looks like these days.
    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...