Jump to content

BaseballHQ: Gausman ready for breakout.


weams

Recommended Posts

Quote

Gausman could be a breakout target... In 2016, Kevin Gausman (RHP, BAL) made 30 starts in the majors for the first time in his young career, posting a 3.61 ERA over 180 IP. As he heads into his age-26 season, is there any reason to anticipate bigger and better things?




Year   IP   ERA  xERA  Ctl  Dom  Cmd  GB/LD/FB  H%/S%  hr/f  FpK  SwK   Vel  BPV

====  ===  ====  ====  ===  ===  ===  ========  =====  ====  ===  ===  ====  ===

2013* 130  4.71  4.11  1.9  8.3  4.4  42/25/33  34/65   19%  61%  10%  95.9  115

2014* 157  3.60  3.92  3.2  7.2  2.2  41/23/35  31/75    6%  57%   9%  94.8   71

2015* 130  4.28  4.42  2.5  8.2  3.3  44/17/38  30/72   13%  55%  12%  95.3   74

2016  180  3.61  3.84  2.4  8.7  3.7  44/21/35  32/78   15%  57%  11%  94.7  115

*Includes MLEs

There's a lot to like here and elsewhere in Gausman's skill history:

  • Steady annual growth in Dom and Cmd led to his best xERA yet in 2016.
  • If you look at his platoon splits, you'll find similar growth vs. LHP, as he's gone from a 1.8 Cmd rate against lefties in 2014 to 3.4 in 2015 and 4.8 in 2016.
  • He closed out 2016 with a 2.83 ERA over his final 12 GS, though the ERA was aided somewhat by an 82% strand rate.
  • Home runs remain an issue, but his 35% fly ball rate was league average while his 15% hr/f was slightly above average, suggesting there's at least a little bad luck at play there. And somewhat surprisingly, the problem has not been homer-friendly Camden Yards; Gausman has a career 1.1 HR/9 at home, versus 1.3 on the road.

With essentially a league average xERA and shoulder issues each of the last two seasons, Gausman is by no means a sure thing, but if you're looking to speculate on a young arm with the potential to take a solid step forward in 2017, he belongs on your list of targets. As the 2017 Baseball Forecaster suggested, a 3.00 ERA and 200 strikeouts could be his upside.

http://www.baseballhq.com/content/factsflukes-gausman-herrmann-benintendi-rivero-grossman?utm_content=bufferb4796&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's hope for the sake of our rotation that Gausman's and Bundy's performance pushes Tillman to our #3 starter after the all-star break. I am hoping that this is the year that Gausman puts it together, and that Bundy is simply flying under the radar a little bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty clear he has the stuff.  It's telling that virtually every team we engage in any kind of trade talks with seems to always ask for Gausman.  Here's the thing, we're going to hit.  They key to our season is the pitching.  If Tillman, Gausman, and Bundy all have good (or better) seasons, than we're in for a fun season that could resemble 2014 and very well go deep into October.  Otherwise, we're probably a fringe playoff team that could sneak into a WC spot with results similar to last season at best, 2013/2015 at worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...