Jump to content

Which O's prospects helped themselves the most in ST?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

So, how about Ynoa?  At 23, he's already got 800 plus professional innings under his belt.  His stats looked like he was hittable in AAA last season, but that was in the PCL - where everyone gets hit.  1.98 ST ERA, he can reach the mid 90's, he doesn't walk people.  I'm expecting there's an excellent chance he'll be the O's 5th starter at some point this season.  Not a dominator, but it seems like he could be a guy who eats a lot of innings.  

And does Liranzo - at just 22 - have the control to figure in the bullpen plans at some point this season?  He's slated to begin in Norfolk.  If Britton is traded, will he be ready to help Baltimore and move up the way Givens has?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Mancini started the year in AA.    Walker already had a full year of AAA under his belt before the season started.   I don't think anyone would have thought Walker had more upside than Mancini, but at the beginning of the year, he might have been considered more major league ready.    They also may have thought he had better tools for making the switch to OF.    It sounds as though that judgment may have been off base.   I'll reserve judgment.     Buck has been pretty encouraging about Mancini's outfield work, but he didn't look too good in the two games I saw him play in Sarasota (which were his first two games in the OF, so I'll cut him some slack).

I think two of the most important things in playing RF in Camden Yards is playing that scoreboard/wall well and having a strong arm.  Range, while still important is less important given the dimensions.  Those were two things Nick did really well (play the board and make strong accurate throws).  Those may be things within Mancini's capability.  We know the range is going to be subpar.  

Trumbo did neither. He was afraid of the wall and while he had a strong enough arm it was negated by the fact that he took forever to get rid of the ball and never got a running start.  That's one thing you will see Seth Smith do well.  While he has just an average arm (below average for RF) he gets rid of the ball very quickly.  I think you'll see him gun down several guys trying to stretch a single into a double and probably a few at home on balls that he can charge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...