Jump to content

When do the O's fish or cut bait with Duquette and Showalter?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If you are going for it next year you keep Dan, if you are blowing it up you replace him.

You let Buck do what he wants as long as he doesn't want to be the GM.

I'm with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, SteveA said:

And I also doubt he wants to stay past his contract, given his attempts to get out of it and go to Toronto.

I agree with your assessment about keeping Duquette for his last year being dependent on going for it in 2018.

Although I have to say, assuming we have a winning season this year, it seems unlikely that a team would fire a GM after his 6th consecutive non-losing seasons that started shortly after he took over, following 14 straight losing seasons.   I fully understand your logic but how often does a guy producing good, consistent results get fired?

I think that if you tell Dan you are blowing it up (which they won't do if they have a winning season) it wouldn't be hard to get him to step down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You think Maddon runs Hardy out there in the two hole for the better part of a season?

Do you see name players taking less money to play for Buck?

Yeah, he did with jayson heyward last year for the most part. 

No, but the Cubs are 5th in player payroll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Yeah, he did with jayson heyward last year for the most part. 

No, but the Cubs are 5th in player payroll

Heyward's OBP last year was 306.  Not good but a far cry from the 282 Hardy put up in 2012.  He also only batted second in 66 games, Hardy did 150 times.  So yea, not the same thing.

As for their payroll, so what?  Do you think that was the best deal Zobrist could get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You think Maddon runs Hardy out there in the two hole for the better part of a season?

Do you see name players taking less money to play for Buck?

He did throw Heyward out there for about 81 games with his 70 OPS+ before moving him to the 5th spot for most of the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

He did throw Heyward out there for about 81 games with his 70 OPS+ before moving him to the 5th spot for most of the rest of the season.

 

26 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Heyward's OBP last year was 306.  Not good but a far cry from the 282 Hardy put up in 2012.  He also only batted second in 66 games, Hardy did 150 times.  So yea, not the same thing.

As for their payroll, so what?  Do you think that was the best deal Zobrist could get?

I even did the work for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

I even did the work for you.

I didn't see that post. Looking at the Cubs lineup all year last year, no matter what work you show, it's hard to defend hitting Heyward in the 2nd or 5th hole after about 1/3 of the season and he wasn't hitting. At all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

I didn't see that post. Looking at the Cubs lineup all year last year, no matter what work you show, it's hard to defend hitting Heyward in the 2nd or 5th hole after about 1/3 of the season and he wasn't hitting. At all.

Heyward had a substantially better resume to date than Hardy did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

It is still not a miscue on the level of batting Hardy and his 282 OBP second for 150 games. 

No, but it's not as far off as you make it seem either. I'm of the mind that both managers are a bit overrated. Joe's hipster glasses and beard have yet to sway me in his favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

No, but it's not as far off as you make it seem either. I'm of the mind that both managers are a bit overrated. Joe's hipster glasses and beard have yet to sway me in his favor.

I don't think he is appreciably better than Buck.  I think he and Bochy might be marginally better.  That guy in NY is better than I want to give him credit for as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think he is appreciably better than Buck.  I think he and Bochy might be marginally better.  That guy in NY is better than I want to give him credit for as well.

Unfortunately, I agree with you about that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think he is appreciably better than Buck.  I think he and Bochy might be marginally better.  That guy in NY is better than I want to give him credit for as well.

Yeah, I have Yankee fan friends that hate Girardi.   And I tell them... look at how the team performs most years compared to their talent.    He's doing something right.

His huge # of visits to the mound (by the catcher, PC, and himself), over managing the bullpen, both annoy me during the game.   And they annoy Yankee fans I know too.

But you can't argue with his results.   (Just like you have to give Buck some credit for our continual over-performance over the PECOTA guesses, nearly every year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think he is appreciably better than Buck.  I think he and Bochy might be marginally better.  That guy in NY is better than I want to give him credit for as well.

Who was to bat second in his stead??  The Orioles used 8 different batters at lead off in 2012.

Nolan Reimold

Nick Markakis

Nate McLouth

Xavier Avery

Ryan Flaherty

Robert Andino

Brian Roberts

Endy Chavez

Batting third was also in flux with eight different players starting in that spot.

I think to hold Buck and his usage of Hardy in the two hole as an argument when the 2012 team was in flux all year is a bit of stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...