Jump to content

Orioles on the clock


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Roy Firestone said:

Talked to some insiders tonight...they LOVE this kid Hall and said we stole him because he is HS kid...but could pitch for us very quickly.2019? He's that good.

What does that mean? HS kids were the first 3 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

Talked to some insiders tonight...they LOVE this kid Hall and said we stole him because he is HS kid...but could pitch for us very quickly.2019? He's that good.

No way he is in the big leagues by then.  If he doesn't get hurt, our player development system shouldn't inspire that much confidence.

Besides, his name is literally DL.  That legit scares me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just saw this quote from Rajisch:

Left-hander DL Hall (21st overall, first round)

Rajsich says: “DL is an exciting pitcher. He’s polished, he has a good delivery, he has a good repertoire of pitches, a good fastball, a good curveball. I think he throws a slider as well, and a good changeup. We project him to be a future starter in our rotation, and it shouldn’t take very long.”

 

Are you telling me you just took a pitcher with your first round draft pick and you are not sure if he has a slider or not????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

I just saw this quote from Rajisch:

Left-hander DL Hall (21st overall, first round)

Rajsich says: “DL is an exciting pitcher. He’s polished, he has a good delivery, he has a good repertoire of pitches, a good fastball, a good curveball. I think he throws a slider as well, and a good changeup. We project him to be a future starter in our rotation, and it shouldn’t take very long.”

 

Are you telling me you just took a pitcher with your first round draft pick and you are not sure if he has a slider or not????

High school pitchers might break out a third pitch once or twice a game.  He very well might be saying "I think he throws a slider that could be a viable pitch going forward.".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

Talked to some insiders tonight...they LOVE this kid Hall and said we stole him because he is HS kid...but could pitch for us very quickly.2019? He's that good.

Thanks Roy.  So much varying info out on this guy.  That's why you gotta love the OH.  I saw reports from him being 5'11" to 6-2".  Topping out at 91 and other saying he sat at 91.  These were newer draft reports so it's not like its from his Soph. year of HS.  Sounds like we got a good one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JohnD said:

No way he is in the big leagues by then.  If he doesn't get hurt, our player development system shouldn't inspire that much confidence.

Besides, his name is literally DL.  That legit scares me....

There is no valid reason why a rational adult should be scared of a player's name, initials or nickname.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • We played all our Saturday games at home at 4pm. That should help us.  I don’t know if that was the full reason we made the switch this year, but it had to factor in. We didn’t do so well in the day games last year in the playoffs.  Also, don’t be surprised to see McCann get a big hit in game 1 and possibly just start this entire series versus the speedster Royals.  Let’s go. We owe these “guys” big time paybacks even if it’s 10 years later. 
    • They also smacked him around for 7 ER on 9 H in 1.2 innings. He can be beaten, though he certainly had a great September.  
    • I understand why posters would want to avoid Skubal in a game 1, but the Royals starters are not going to be a cakewalk. Probably a deeper starting staff with Ragans, Lugo and Wacha.
    • Interesting article …. Pretty surprising stat with all the guys that we lost to injury       https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-made-it-through-rough-t
    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...