Jump to content

Enough is enough, Tillman does not need another start


Barnaby Graves

Recommended Posts

The O's have an off day this Thursday, so I simply skip Tillman's turn in the rotation this time through.    Then the next two times, I give the ball to Ynoa or anyone else with a pulse.   Then the O's have off days on both the 25th and 28th, so no sixth starter is needed.    Done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

The O's have an off day this Thursday, so I simply skip Tillman's turn in the rotation this time through.    Then the next two times, I give the ball to Ynoa or anyone else with a pulse.   Then the O's have off days on both the 25th and 28th, so no sixth starter is needed.    Done.

I'd line it up like this:

Bundy, Hellickson, Gausman (NYY)

Wright, Miley, Bundy (Cle) -six days for Bundy because of the offday Thursday

Gausman, Hellickson, Wright/Ynoa (Tor)

Miley, Bundy, Gausman, Hellickson (NYY)

Wright/Ynoa, Miley, Bundy (Bos)

Gausman, Hellickson, Wright, Miley (TB)

Gausman, Bundy (PItt)

Hellickson, Miley, Gausman (TB)

Bundy --Wildcard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2017 at 6:09 PM, Nevermore said:

Nice article about resigning Chris Tillman.  I trust that Oriole fans didn't boo him off the mound when Buck removed him from the game.

Meh, he gives the Orioles too much credit for letting the market determine value. Is that what happened with Davis?

I do, however agree with his premise of Tillman getting a reasonable one year deal. Not sure I agree with his numbers, but I get they have to make it worth his while. I like the idea of incentives getting him up to the level of what he made this year.

Tillman (5.7 fWAR) gets the benefit of the doubt for his performance as an Oriole compared to Jimenez (4.8 fWAR) over the life of the contract he signed with the Orioles. Tillman was paid $21 million over those four years and Jimenez was paid more than double that ($50 million).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

I'd line it up like this:

Bundy, Hellickson, Gausman (NYY)

Wright, Miley, Bundy (Cle) -six days for Bundy because of the offday Thursday

Gausman, Hellickson, Wright/Ynoa (Tor)

Miley, Bundy, Gausman, Hellickson (NYY)

Wright/Ynoa, Miley, Bundy (Bos)

Gausman, Hellickson, Wright, Miley (TB)

Gausman, Bundy (PItt)

Hellickson, Miley, Gausman (TB)

Bundy --Wildcard

Pretty good. As I was trying to point out in the other thread, there are other options besides Tillman or Jimenez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear, I don't think the O's should DFA Tillman.  Let him stay in the bullpen and get mop-up work.  If the O's are eliminated from the playoffs, let him get one more start so the fans can say goodbye.  

But I don't think the O's should resign Tillman to a major league contract.  A minor league contract with a spring training invite and a chance to prove that his stuff and command have returned is all I would offer.  One thing I learned while looking up comparably bad seasons historically is that it is extremely rare for a pitcher to have a season this bad and ever pitch effectively in the majors again, unless the pitcher is very young (like Halladay, or Cal McLish who was knocked around the NL at age 18 during WWII and became a good pitcher a few years later).   Odds are that Chris Tillman will never pitch well in the majors again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎3‎/‎2017 at 11:37 PM, Three Run Homer said:

Chris Tillman is a great Oriole.  He deserves more loyalty than most players on the team.  But it is ridiculous that he is still getting regular starts.  

How bad is Tillman's season, in historical context?  Here are all of the pitchers since 1901 with 18 or more starts and an ERA above 7.50 in a season.

Chris Tillman, 2017:  20 G, 18 S, 83.1 IP, 7.85 ERA

Hideo Nomo, 2004:  18S, 84.1 IP, 8.25 ERA

Mike Moore, 1995:  25S, 132 IP, 7.53 ERA

Steve Blass, 1973, 23G, 18S, 88.2 IP, 9.85 ERA

Claude Willoughby, 1930 Phillies (Baker Bowl):  41G, 24 S, 153 IP, 7.59 ERA 

Les Sweetland, 1930 Phillies, 34 G, 25 S, 167 IP, 7.71 ERA

There are other pitchers who have had higher ERAs in fewer starts, like Brian Matusz in 2011 or Roy Halladay in 2000, but their managers pulled them from the rotation before they could get to 18 starts.  The only 2 pitchers to get 18 or more starts in MLB history with an ERA higher than 7.85 are Hideo Nomo in 2004 and Steve Blass in 1973 (the gold standard for terrible seasons by a pitcher).

For the love of God, Buck...please stop this.  

 

Bud Norris with his 2-9 record and 7.06 ERA in 2015 would have been this team's 3rd worst starter.  Scary!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...