Jump to content

Orioles announce new Theme Nights at the Park


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 4 months later...
On 4/19/2018 at 12:48 PM, LookitsPuck said:

Absolutely love it. Big respect to the Orioles to have the LGBT Pride Night. Very proud of them.

I really never heard more about this and was curious whether it drew a crowd.   Answer: not really. The team drew 15,000 fans that night, compared to 16,000 the day before and 14,000 the day after.    

Also, I guess Bark in the Park got rained out, so they’re doing it on Sept. 12.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I really never heard more about this and was curious whether it drew a crowd.   Answer: not really. The team drew 15,000 fans that night, compared to 16,000 the day before and 14,000 the day after.    

Also, I guess Bark in the Park got rained out, so they’re doing it on Sept. 12.    

I think it's more about social acceptance and awareness than it is, necessarily, about driving more butts in the seats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

I really never heard more about this and was curious whether it drew a crowd.   Answer: not really. The team drew 15,000 fans that night, compared to 16,000 the day before and 14,000 the day after.    

Also, I guess Bark in the Park got rained out, so they’re doing it on Sept. 12.    

It drew a different type of crowd and made them feel welcome at Camden Yards. That's important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, theocean said:

It drew a different type of crowd and made them feel welcome at Camden Yards. That's important.

First of all, I’m all for this event.   

But I wonder how much of a different type of crowd it actually drew.    How many of the 15,000 were there specifically because it was Pride Night?    My guess is, a pretty small number (probably in the hundreds).    However many it was, I hope they enjoyed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to keep in mind is that all these theme nights come with specially purchased tickets.   That goes for all 9 University nights, as well as the others.

And they announce them after the season has started... so chances are pretty good that a lot of the people coming out for them would not have come out if it wasn't a theme night they were interested in.   I wouldn't have gone to a random Wednesday night Met game in August if it hadn't been Virginia Tech night.

So I think it's working out well... each one draws different groups of people that might or might not go to games, but they make a point to go tot he theme night that is relevant to them.

They keep adding them too, they just added an Oktoberfest night for Sept 28, with a pretty nice big stein as a giveaway.

They have been really making an effort the past couple years.   The uptick in quality and uniqueness of giveaways in 2017 was very noticeable, and now the theme nights in 2018 are a great idea.   And the kids free seats too.

The product on the field is what it is, but the promotions department is doing about as much as you could possibly hope for to put fans in the seats and generate new fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

I really never heard more about this and was curious whether it drew a crowd.   Answer: not really. The team drew 15,000 fans that night, compared to 16,000 the day before and 14,000 the day after.    

Also, I guess Bark in the Park got rained out, so they’re doing it on Sept. 12.    

2.000 tickets were supposedly sold.All the tickets allocated were sold.Rained that day so some people did not show up.This has been going on since 2014 when the event was not officially sponsored by the Orioles but they give them a section and 100 discounted tickets.Maybe have this every week and draw an additional 2,000 people?.

 

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/orioles-host-first-lgbt-pride-night/c-283217860

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the years, I've been to the ballpark more times than I can count, so I have had my fill of the "ballpark experience."  I'll be going to the game vs Toronto on the 19th for no other reason than it's "University of Maryland" night.  Prior to that, the last game was "Social Media Night" with Eddie Murray.  If it weren't for these couple theme nights, I haven't felt a compelling need to be there in person for the public execution of this year's team (24-44 at home).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

Over the years, I've been to the ballpark more times than I can count, so I have had my fill of the "ballpark experience."  I'll be going to the game vs Toronto on the 19th for no other reason than it's "University of Maryland" night.  Prior to that, the last game was "Social Media Night" with Eddie Murray.  If it weren't for these couple theme nights, I haven't felt a compelling need to be there in person for the public execution of this year's team (24-44 at home).

I still love attending baseball games.    This year I’ve only attended 3-4 though.    I did see a couple of wins.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...