Jump to content

Jimmy Yacabonis 2018


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Is the goal for Yacabonis to be long relief?  Why lift him after four innings? 

Yes, pretty much. At least it should be -- Yacabonis doesn't have the stamina to be a starter in the bigs, and I think the Orioles are realizing that.

In his five starts for the O's this year, Yacabonis has pitched into the fifth inning three times. In that inning, opposing batters are 7-for-11 with two home runs against him. All told this year, when Yac faces an opposing lineup for a second time, they're batting .344 with a 1.198 OPS against him.

He can be effective once through a lineup, but that's pretty much it. I'd see him as a 2-3 inning pitcher in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaulFolk said:

Yes, pretty much. At least it should be -- Yacabonis doesn't have the stamina to be a starter in the bigs, and I think the Orioles are realizing that.

In his five starts for the O's this year, Yacabonis has pitched into the fifth inning three times. In that inning, opposing batters are 7-for-11 with two home runs against him. All told this year, when Yac faces an opposing lineup for a second time, they're batting .344 with a 1.198 OPS against him.

He can be effective once through a lineup, but that's pretty much it. I'd see him as a 2-3 inning pitcher in the majors.

Is stamina develop-able? He's only had one year of trying to be a starter.  I don't know if he can add another inning--maybe workouts with Brady will help.?

Actually, with the number of pitchers we have that don't seem to go beyond the 5th inning well, I'd like to try an approach where we only expect the starter to go 5 innings, maybe 6 only if they are throwing extremely well, then we have relievers who have been prepared to go 2 or 3 innings starting a fresh inning--trained like Scott with three inning appearances in the minors.  Of course, we probably could not do it with Buck managing as he seems to like to let a starter pitch until he's in trouble.  I would not have had Bundy start the 7th last game because he gave up runs in 5 and 6 and hasn't been pitching well lately.

If this became a set approach, we might be able to go with 4 starters (I'm old enough to remember 4 starters who tried to go whole games, impossible today, but at 5 innings possible I think), 4 2-inning relievers and 3 to take on the 8th and 9th.  No loogies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PaulFolk said:

Yes, pretty much. At least it should be -- Yacabonis doesn't have the stamina to be a starter in the bigs, and I think the Orioles are realizing that.

In his five starts for the O's this year, Yacabonis has pitched into the fifth inning three times. In that inning, opposing batters are 7-for-11 with two home runs against him. All told this year, when Yac faces an opposing lineup for a second time, they're batting .344 with a 1.198 OPS against him.

He can be effective once through a lineup, but that's pretty much it. I'd see him as a 2-3 inning pitcher in the majors.

He could have easily lost it in the fourth and removing him was the correct call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pheasants said:

Is stamina develop-able? He's only had one year of trying to be a starter.  I don't know if he can add another inning--maybe workouts with Brady will help.?

Actually, with the number of pitchers we have that don't seem to go beyond the 5th inning well, I'd like to try an approach where we only expect the starter to go 5 innings, maybe 6 only if they are throwing extremely well, then we have relievers who have been prepared to go 2 or 3 innings starting a fresh inning--trained like Scott with three inning appearances in the minors.  Of course, we probably could not do it with Buck managing as he seems to like to let a starter pitch until he's in trouble.  I would not have had Bundy start the 7th last game because he gave up runs in 5 and 6 and hasn't been pitching well lately.

If this became a set approach, we might be able to go with 4 starters (I'm old enough to remember 4 starters who tried to go whole games, impossible today, but at 5 innings possible I think), 4 2-inning relievers and 3 to take on the 8th and 9th.  No loogies.

The Orioles are nowhere close to developing MLB starter that can go 8 innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I kind of like Yac.    He’s had some very rough outings and is inconsistent, but he can look pretty dominating at times.    I won’t be surprised if he ends up having a decent bullpen career.   

Jim Hunter does too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

They went to the same high school!

Hopefully it’s gotten better since Hunter graduated.    

Ah, just having a cheap joke at Hunter’s expense.    I’m not crazy about him as an announcer, but I have no opinion on his education.  By the way, according to Wikipedia (for Hunter) and BB-ref, he went to a different high school than Yacabonis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...