Jump to content

How do you rate the return on the Britton trade?


Frobby

How do you rate the return on the Britton trade  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you rate the return for Britton?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/31/18 at 06:54

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, atomic said:

Disappointing return for a guy who was best reliever in baseball for two straight seasons who seemed to have regained his stuff and was pitching well.  If we waited and Britton continued to pitch well we would have gotten more.  And to the Yankees just rubs salt in the wounds. Plus these guys are old for their levels.  Sorry don't see this trade as a positive at all

Luckily everyone can have their opinion.

It's overwhelmingly seen as good from most everyone else. So that's good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, ISU94 said:

Luckily everyone can have their opinion.

It's overwhelmingly seen as good from most everyone else. So that's good.

Older prospects who still need to work on things.  Probably a couple of middling relievers.  I guess people weren't expecting much.   The outlook for this team is depressing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, atomic said:

Disappointing return for a guy who was best reliever in baseball for two straight seasons who seemed to have regained his stuff and was pitching well.  If we waited and Britton continued to pitch well we would have gotten more.  And to the Yankees just rubs salt in the wounds. Plus these guys are old for their levels.  Sorry don't see this trade as a positive at all. 

Zach Britton hadn't thrown a clean inning in his last 5 starts. Even when results were there, his control looked shaky. We are a week away from the deadline and one poor outing would hurt his value much more than three good outings would help it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, atomic said:

Older prospects who still need to work on things.  Probably a couple of middling relievers.  I guess people weren't expecting much.   The outlook for this team is depressing.  

You're trying so hard man. 

Numerous sources from scouts that have no ties have said we did well.

Go ahead and continue doing you though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said decent, but I'd rate the haul somewhere between decent and solid. The fact is that Britton is 30 and has had his share of injuries. On the flip side, he has been pitching well this year and it's going to royally suck to see him in pinstripes.

The haul was OK. We picked up a guy who could be part of the rotation for a few years and a guy who could be the future closer or set up guy. Heck, even Rogers has a chance to give us something as a SP or long reliever but at worst he's solid organizational depth. No high ceiling guys who are going to be all star reps for the Orioles or anything like that. But we picked up more future pieces. And that's what we lack right now. We're probably going to be the #1 pick in the draft next year... and maybe if we have a hot streak, we'll be third at the lowest. And we'll probably be a top 5 pick or so the following year. I know the MLB draft is more of a crapshoot than the NFL draft, but we should be able to get a couple of POTENTIAL high ceiling guys with those picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Zach Britton hadn't thrown a clean inning in his last 5 starts. Even when results were there, his control looked shaky. We are a week away from the deadline and one poor outing would hurt his value much more than three good outings would help it. 

But if he had bad outing and we didn't get these guys so what?   They aren't going to turn us into winners.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Zach Britton hadn't thrown a clean inning in his last 5 starts. Even when results were there, his control looked shaky. We are a week away from the deadline and one poor outing would hurt his value much more than three good outings would help it. 

It's a depressing life to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, atomic said:

But if he had bad outing and we didn't get these guys so what?   They aren't going to turn us into winners.   

You could say that about any deal. Literally any.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Who were we going to get for him next week that was going to turn the franchise around?

Every post he makes has got to be tounge in cheek. Seriously, there's no way.

I'm done with whatever he's trying to do here. There's no way he's serious 95 percent of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted disappointed, not based off the prospects, but the situation itself. What could have been had they traded him at peak value when teams were overvaluing closers. Just sucks all the wasted value of Manny & Britton trades.

As for the trade itself, seems like decent value considering the circumstances 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, atomic said:

But if he had bad outing and we didn't get these guys so what?   They aren't going to turn us into winners.   

Except the strategy right now isn't to find the magic trade that by itself makes us a winning organization. The strategy right now is to bring in as many legitimate future big leagues players as we can. We don't need to find the next face of the Orioles right now. We need to find more legitimate guys who can be legitimate contributors. You can't win with a team that has 2 or 3 superstars and 3-5 solid players. You need to have depth... and we're picking up quantity to build that future depth. Not every player we pick up is going to work out and contribute for the Orioles. But of the 8 guys we picked up in the Machado/Britton trades, there's a solid chance that four or five of them will make a significant contribution.... and 2 or 3 have a real chance to play a significant role for the long term (4-5 years+). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, utvolzac said:

I voted disappointed, not based off the prospects, but the situation itself. What could have been had they traded him at peak value when teams were overvaluing closers. Just sucks all the wasted value of Manny & Britton trades.

As for the trade itself, seems like decent value considering the circumstances 

Man, we weren't ever dealing him in 2016 or when we we're competing. No team does that.

Last year it sounds like it would've been a comparable return. So I don't think it would be been much of a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...