Jump to content

Duquette Communication


Dipper9

Recommended Posts

We’ve heard from several ex Orioles that say Duquette and the Orioles never reached out to them when they became free agents, or guys like Schoop and Machado who say there was never any communication or serious attempts to offer them extensions while they were here and younger.  For the longest time I thought this was just bitterness from ex Orioles players, but when so many say the same thing, it leads me to believe there is truth behind it.  

Even with the rebuild and the young talent Duquette has brought in, we need a leader who openly communicates with the players or their agents on matters like this. 

What say you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

We’ve heard from several ex Orioles that say Duquette and the Orioles never reached out to them when they became free agents, or guys like Schoop and Machado who say there was never any communication or serious attempts to offer them extensions while they were here and younger.  For the longest time I thought this was just bitterness from ex Orioles players, but when so many say the same thing, it leads me to believe there is truth behind it.  

Even with the rebuild and the young talent Duquette has brought in, we need a leader who openly communicates with the players or their agents on matters like this. 

What say you? 

I have to agree hopefully this is another Peter Angelos wrong that will be fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

We’ve heard from several ex Orioles that say Duquette and the Orioles never reached out to them when they became free agents, or guys like Schoop and Machado who say there was never any communication or serious attempts to offer them extensions while they were here and younger.  For the longest time I thought this was just bitterness from ex Orioles players, but when so many say the same thing, it leads me to believe there is truth behind it.  

Even with the rebuild and the young talent Duquette has brought in, we need a leader who openly communicates with the players or their agents on matters like this. 

What say you? 

I say Dan seems like the type that won't return an agent's call instead of telling them he isn't interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I say Dan seems like the type that won't return an agent's call instead of telling them he isn't interested.

But don’t we want our GM to answer the call? Don’t we want our GM at least asking Manny and Schoop agents what it would take to extend them? It’s sounding more and more like these conversations don’t happen and he just assumes they are not extendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

But don’t we want our GM to answer the call? Don’t we want our GM at least asking Manny and Schoop agents what it would take to extend them? It’s sounding more and more like these conversations don’t happen and he just assumes they are not extendable.

I don't think we can judge anything when Peter is/was in control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't like how he handled the whole Jones thing.

Find it totally ridiculous we didn't explore extensions with Manny and Schoop. Now, it's likely Manny would've never extended with us but you had years to likely lock up Schoop for probably not a ton of money (he sold off 10% of future earnings so seems likely he'd be open to financial security. He also has brought up us not exploring extension with him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Finisher said:

Don't like how he handled the whole Jones thing.

Meaning what? Adam seems mostly pissed at the media hounding him. If DD asked Adam if he would approve a trade and Adam declined, what else is there to see here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

But don’t we want our GM to answer the call? Don’t we want our GM at least asking Manny and Schoop agents what it would take to extend them? It’s sounding more and more like these conversations don’t happen and he just assumes they are not extendable.

I think they had a very good idea what it would take to keep Machado and Schoop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, now said:

Meaning what? Adam seems mostly pissed at the media hounding him. If DD asked Adam if he would approve a trade and Adam declined, what else is there to see here?

Plus Adam had dinner with John Angelos in Toronto where presumably the topic of the house demolition came up. Not every player had a sit down with ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think they had a very good idea what it would take to keep Machado and Schoop.

I’m not necessarily disagreeing, but isn’t this kinda like not asking the girl to the prom because you think she’ll say no, only to find out afterwards that she really wanted to go with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, now said:

Meaning what? Adam seems mostly pissed at the media hounding him. If DD asked Adam if he would approve a trade and Adam declined, what else is there to see here?

It doesn't seem like DD ascertained whether Jones would be open to a trade. It seems like DD negotiated a trade with Philly and AFTER THE FACT determined Jones was, in fact, not going to waive his no trade.

Why would you waste your time banging out a deal(s) for a player that isn't going to waive his no trade when you have a half dozen other players who could be moved? Why would you now open up Jones to more scrutiny when a simple verification beforehand would have caused you to not bother hammering out a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

I’m not necessarily disagreeing, but isn’t this kinda like not asking the girl to the prom because you think she’ll say no, only to find out afterwards that she really wanted to go with you?

No.

I think it is more like not asking her because her best friend told you she is only willing to go with you if you rent her a limo and take her out to dinner at that fancy french bistro in the ritzy side of town.  But she wants to look approachable to the rest of the boys so she says she would have gone if you had asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

I’m not necessarily disagreeing, but isn’t this kinda like not asking the girl to the prom because you think she’ll say no, only to find out afterwards that she really wanted to go with you?

 

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No.

I think it is more like not asking her because her best friend told you she is only willing to go with you if you rent her a limo and take her out to dinner at that fancy french bistro in the ritzy side of town.  But she wants to look approachable to the rest of the boys so she says she would have gone if you had asked.

You guys asked girls to the prom? I was in my room playing Strat-O-Matic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Finisher said:

It doesn't seem like DD ascertained whether Jones would be open to a trade. It seems like DD negotiated a trade with Philly and AFTER THE FACT determined Jones was, in fact, not going to waive his no trade.

Why would you waste your time banging out a deal(s) for a player that isn't going to waive his no trade when you have a half dozen other players who could be moved? Why would you now open up Jones to more scrutiny when a simple verification beforehand would have caused you to not bother hammering out a trade.

Fair enough to question, if that's true... though it's debatable, and speculative as to how it actually played out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...