Jump to content

The fans should not be voting


mikezpen

Recommended Posts

You have a bunch of Japanese voting in Fukodome and Suziki as starters. Neither deserved to start and probably didn't even deserve to be on the All-Star teams.Suziki has only three more home runs than I do for cryinoutloud, and a whole lot fewer than Nick Markakis.I'm pretty furious with the Greeks right now, to tell you the truth.You have Jason Varitek, whose numbers are outdone in almost every instance by Ramon Hernandez's.What's he doing there at all? It's a matter of whose fans can sit down at a computer and vote 20 times for somebody. Or is it 25? I forget.

Fans shouldn't be voting for the All-Star team. The game shouldn't be about a bunch of people who live 20,000 miles away wanting to stuff the ballot box for a couple of their national heroes.It's not about the starry-eyed getting their favorites in the starting lineup, regardless of how devoted they are. It's not about who the fans want to see; it's about who is an ALL STAR. There is a difference-or at least there should be.

Granted, no system is perfect. But what we have now is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a bunch of Japanese voting in Fukodome and Suziki as starters. Neither deserved to start and probably didn't even deserve to be on the All-Star teams.Suziki has only three more home runs than I do for cryinoutloud, and a whole lot fewer than Nick Markakis.I'm pretty furious with the Greeks right now, to tell you the truth.You have Jason Varitek, whose numbers are outdone in almost every instance by Ramon Hernandez's.What's he doing there at all? It's a matter of whose fans can sit down at a computer and vote 20 times for somebody. Or is it 25? I forget.

Fans shouldn't be voting for the All-Star team. The game shouldn't be about a bunch of people who live 20,000 miles away wanting to stuff the ballot box for a couple of their national heroes.It's not about the starry-eyed getting their favorites in the starting lineup, regardless of how devoted they are. It's not about who the fans want to see; it's about who is an ALL STAR. There is a difference-or at least there should be.

Granted, no system is perfect. But what we have now is a joke.

Ask Tony what happens to a website's advertising revenue when they get millions of clicks regularly. It is a problem any website owner would love to have. MLB won't be letting that go anytime soon.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't/shouldn't it be about who the fans want to see?

That's probably the best definition there is of a "star."

There needs to be qualifiers though - a guy batting .230 or lower should not be an All-Star for that season. It has to be stats based to a point. If that means that Cal Ripken may not have made a few All-Star games, then so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There needs to be qualifiers though - a guy batting .230 or lower should not be an All-Star for that season. It has to be stats based to a point. If that means that Cal Ripken may not have made a few All-Star games, then so be it.

Fans aren't allowed to like an icon like Cal Ripken unless/until he surpasses some arbitrary statistical threshold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well dave, it's an ALL-STAR game, not an ALL-POPULAR game.

There's a certain level of popularity/notoriety contained within the word "star."

Another point, should players be picked solely on the year they are having at the break? That's how you wind up with All Star Ken Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the worst thing they could do would be to create a system where everyone actually can agree that the best and most deserving players make the team, thereby eliminating the debate.

Or, said another way, they shouldn't do much of anything, and we can keep on having the fun of thinking up and discussing new ways to pick the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...