Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, interloper said:

Totally fair response and I definitely get it. 

I guess I kind of just don't care how cold and heartless they are about the current 25-man roster in the next few years as long as I'm seeing real progress in the places where the Orioles have been literally decades behind the rest of the game (analytics, scouting, international, technology, coaching, development, etc). Seeing that stuff built up the right way by really smart/accomplished people has done more for my morale as an O's fan than any 25-man roster move could. 

We know this team has money and will spend money. They've spent it like absolute boneheads for the most part (Davis, Cobb, Ubaldo), but they will spend when the time is right to strike. In no way does waiving Villar make me worry about a homegrown #1 pick stud like Adley, if he indeed lives up to the hype. 

Mancini won't be next this year, but he 100% will be when he's in his last year before free agency. Bundy will be and should be traded for whatever you can get. None of that has anything to do with the next wave of talent, because that wave is Elias' wave. The fans who jump off because of this kind of thing can see themselves out. They'll be back when the team starts winning with a group of young stars supplemented by smart free agency and trade pickups. 

And I understand your take, but what makes you think the money they are saving by just cutting or trading veterans is going to go back into those developments? Those things happened last year while they were paying Davis, Cobb, Trumbo around $50 million to stink or not play. 

Basically I'm all about them not going out and trying to sign Free agents, but you just don't cut the guys you already have for nothing. That's just embarrassing and sends an awful message. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'd argue that we might have made it more easily if Buck would have played the clearly better that year Joseph over Wieters more.

You realize that was the year Caleb had a .413 OPS and zero RBI in 141 PA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I wonder what the difference is between the lowest profit and the highest profit?

Was 2016 one of the years the Orioles "lost" money?

The Phillies made 88M in 2016 (Forbes).  If the difference between first and 30th is 50 million a year I'm guessing a lot of team owners would rather have a half a billion dollars.

Isn't 1000 millions = to 1 Billion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But his framing was aces!

Well, not to pour more salt on Tony’s wound, but the pitchers had a 3.98 ERA for Wieters compared to 4.28 for Joseph.   And, the team went 65-48 in Wieters’ starts, 19-21 in Joseph’s starts.     So, I think we win this argument.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Clearly better?

By rWAR 2016:

Wieters-   1.9

Joseph-   -.9

I meant coming into the year Caleb was clearly better. Caleb just could not produce without regular at bats. When he played regularly he produced. Signing Wieters to the $17 million QO was a gamble that didn't pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Am I doing something wrong?

50M X 10 = 500M.  500M X 2 = 1000 million. 

Just expressing it funny.   1000 million is a billion.   

I have a project in mind to track some of the Forbes data over a period of time and see what the long term profitability is, recognizing the limits on the accuracy or completeness of that data.    But I don’t think the results will surprise anyone.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

I meant coming into the year Caleb was clearly better. Caleb just could not produce without regular at bats. When he played regularly he produced. Signing Wieters to the $17 million QO was a gamble that didn't pay off.

I think we can all agree the gamble that I would always be right did not pay off. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...