Jump to content

What MLB team did Baltimore fans root for before 1954?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think the difference is that Baltimore had a famous major league team in the 1800s, then a dynastic International League team in the teens and 20s.  And I think Baltimore always saw itself as a "big" city at least on par with Washington and others. 

Akron had few or none of those things.  Even in the chaotic 19th century they never had a major league team, even briefly.  Butts Wagner (Honus' brother) played briefly for Canton in the low-level Interstate League in 1895... Akron had a team in the 1920 IL featuring Jim Thorpe, but they didn't have one in '19 or '21.  Apparently they had a Yanks' affiliate in the 30s.  I'm guessing the sporadic fielding of teams in the area made it hard to be a fan of the local team.  And in 1940 Akron had 250k people, Cleveland 900k.

All true.    Although Akron did have an identity completely separate of Cleveland’s, as the self-styled “Rubber Capital of the World.”

And to this day, as I can personally attest, it is the home of the greatest drive-in hamburger joint in  the entire world.     If you are ever within 50 miles of the place, do yourself a favor and go there.   Humble, but to die for.   http://swensonsdriveins.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Frobby said:

All true.    Although Akron did have an identity completely separate of Cleveland’s, as the self-styled “Rubber Capital of the World.”

And to this day, as I can personally attest, it is the home of the greatest drive-in hamburger joint in  the entire world.     If you are ever within 50 miles of the place, do yourself a favor and go there.   Humble, but to die for.   http://swensonsdriveins.com/

In 1940 Baltimore was the 7th largest city in the country and Akron was 38th.  It is surprising Baltimore didn’t have a major league team at that time.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, atomic said:

In 1940 Baltimore was the 7th largest city in the country and Akron was 38th.  It is surprising Baltimore didn’t have a major league team at that time.  
 

 

In 1940 Major League Baseball hadn't expanded, contracted, or allowed a team to move in 38 years.  And they wouldn't do any of that for another 12.  Baseball decided that it was divine providence that Boston, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia and St. Louis had multiple teams, but California, Texas, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Seattle, Canada, the Mountain Time Zone, and the entire South had none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

In 1940 Major League Baseball hadn't expanded, contracted, or allowed a team to move in 38 years.  And they wouldn't do any of that for another 12.  Baseball decided that it was divine providence that Boston, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia and St. Louis had multiple teams, but California, Texas, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Seattle, Canada, the Mountain Time Zone, and the entire South had none.

I think what I’d say is that in 1940 “the major leagues” and “baseball” were not as synonymous as they are today.     I mean, there was nothing stopping someone from forming a league including the cities and geographies you listed that had no major league team, and then paying enough to attract the best talent.    So I don’t blame the existing major leagues for standing pat, but I do wonder why nobody else made a serious effort to fill the void.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only speak from experience listening to my grandfather, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were some fans in the area back then that liked the Yankees.  My grandfather sure did, he loved Mickey Mantle and Whitey Ford, plus they were regionally close and successful.  You weren't getting success out of the Phillies, Athletics, or Senators at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think what I’d say is that in 1940 “the major leagues” and “baseball” were not as synonymous as they are today.     I mean, there was nothing stopping someone from forming a league including the cities and geographies you listed that had no major league team, and then paying enough to attract the best talent.    So I don’t blame the existing major leagues for standing pat, but I do wonder why nobody else made a serious effort to fill the void.   

Nothing except the reserve clause. In the ‘40s players that jumped to the Mexican League received lifetime bans. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

I can only speak from experience listening to my grandfather, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were some fans in the area back then that liked the Yankees.  My grandfather sure did, he loved Mickey Mantle and Whitey Ford, plus they were regionally close and successful.  You weren't getting success out of the Phillies, Athletics, or Senators at that time.

Plus sports weren't as popular back then.  The 1940 Phillies drew an average of 2600 fans per game.  1952 Phillies drew 9400 fans per game.  It wasn't until 1974 that the Phillies averaged 20,000 fans per game.  1953 Senators drew 7900 fans per game.  That version of the Senators never drew more than 13,500 fans per season.  

For reference the Women's soccer league that Drungo likes to belittle averaged 7400 fans per game this past season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think what I’d say is that in 1940 “the major leagues” and “baseball” were not as synonymous as they are today.     I mean, there was nothing stopping someone from forming a league including the cities and geographies you listed that had no major league team, and then paying enough to attract the best talent.    So I don’t blame the existing major leagues for standing pat, but I do wonder why nobody else made a serious effort to fill the void.   

That's what I was trying to get across with the International League Orioles.  Everyone knew the majors were a little better, but the Orioles were really good and they were local. 

The PCL tried pretty hard in the 1950s, successfully lobbying for an Open classification instead of AAA.  That pressure was a big part of the Majors allowing teams to move west, and then expand.  And even before that they were pretty good at keeping players for a long time, even though many could have gone east and become MLB regulars.  I think that the PCL could/should have tried to go major earlier and it would have worked.  In a lot of ways the structure of MLB would make more sense with 3-4 leagues that are more geographically compact.

And the Federal League gave it a go in 1914-15, but with no real western teams.  I think the travel times were a big hindrance before jet airline travel became common.  Washington to LA on a train probably took 48-72 hours.  Jet travel really started in the 1950s, and by the end of the decade there were MLB teams on the West Coast.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, atomic said:

Also 1953 Philadephia A's averaged 4600 fans per game.  Most people probably didn't follow baseball. 

With the Great Depression, World War 2 and Korean War they had real things to deal with. 

While there's a lot of truth there, the 1948 Indians drew 2.6M.  Although attendance took a huge hit in the 50s, probably due to TV more than anything else. The Dodgers and Giants moved because they couldn't draw fans.  The Dodgers were in the biggest city in the US, winning 90+ games most years in the 1950s, but even after the Korean War and the advent of night baseball they had years where they barely broke 1M at the turnstiles.  

TV, and the beginning of the decay or perceived decay of inner cities.  People fled to the suburbs in this era.  And while we think of places like Ebbets Field and the Polo Grounds as famous, historic places, by the mid-50s they were 40-50 years old, built to 1910s standards or worse and shoehorned into little blocks in neighborhoods that were getting a little neglected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

While there's a lot of truth there, the 1948 Indians drew 2.6M.  Although attendance took a huge hit in the 50s, probably due to TV more than anything else. The Dodgers and Giants moved because they couldn't draw fans.  The Dodgers were in the biggest city in the US, winning 90+ games most years in the 1950s, but even after the Korean War and the advent of night baseball they had years where they barely broke 1M at the turnstiles.  

TV, and the beginning of the decay or perceived decay of inner cities.  People fled to the suburbs in this era.  And while we think of places like Ebbets Field and the Polo Grounds as famous, historic places, by the mid-50s they were 40-50 years old, built to 1910s standards or worse and shoehorned into little blocks in neighborhoods that were getting a little neglected.

It is interesting that 1948 was a high water mark for the Yankees attendance until 1979.  And MLB 1948 attendance per game average was not matched again until 1977.

Maybe the reason Frobby parents were into the Indians was because baseball was so much more popular in the Cleveland area than most parts of the country.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, atomic said:

It is interesting that 1948 was a high water mark for the Yankees attendance until 1979.  And MLB 1948 attendance per game average was not matched again until 1977.

Maybe the reason Frobby parents were into the Indians was because baseball was so much more popular in the Cleveland area than most parts of the country.  

 

There was a huge, pent-up demand for entertainment in the immediate post-WWII era.  The country had been at war or in the Depression for more than 15 years.  The GIs got back from Europe and the Pacific and baseball attendance absolutely boomed.  But then it rapidly fell off with the introduction of TV, suburban flight, urban neglect, uncompetitive teams (especially 2nd teams in Boston, Philly, St. Louis, etc).  Other sports started gaining traction like football and basketball.  Also, I think people just got tired of the Yanks running away with the league almost every single !@#$%^ year.  

Free agency, good pennant races, and teams marketing and trying to generate revenues to keep up with the Yanks and Dodgers started to build interest in the 70s.  Also helped that in the 60s MLB got better aligned with the population, although franchise movement and expansion was chaotic and at least in the short term caused some harm as well as good.  See: the millions of people who still claim to be Brooklyn Dodgers fans, despite them drawing less fans than the 2019 Orioles just before they moved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Larry18 said:

1948. The first year both leagues were integrated at the start of the season

That probably helped attendance some.  But we can't pretend that this wasn't a divisive issue at the time. I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing some segment of the population stayed away because of integration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...