Jump to content

RIP Steve Dalkowski


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

I was looking at Dalkowski's minor league stats, and they let people do some crazy stuff back in the day.

In 1957 in the Appy League Dalkowski pitched 15 games, 10 starts, 62 innings, 129 walks, 121 strikeouts and 39 wild pitches. On top of that Kingsport's catchers had 50 passed balls in 71 games, and you can bet the majority of them were with Dalkowski on the mound.  There was another guy on the team, Harold Edwards, who walked a batter an inning.  Dalkowski doubled his mark.

So he did lead the league with 17.6 K/9, but there were others at 14.4, 14.2, 13.1.  He kind of lapped the field with 18.7 walks per nine, but there were others like Andrew Rodriguez who walked 60 in 39 innings.

In the '58 Sally League he had 17.6 strikeouts per nine, and the next guy on the list was at 9.8.  He walked 20.4 per nine, trailing the league by 10.5 per nine.

'60 was the year he threw 170 innings, 262 walks, 262 Ks.  Didn't lead the league in Ks... Gary Kroll had 309, but in 257 innings.  Kroll was 18, and I estimate he threw over 4500 pitches in 34 starts, which works out to 135 pitches/start.  By the same estimating method, Dalkowski threw about 125 pitches per start, but he only threw 5.5 innings/start.  Which make for a pace of over 200 pitches per nine.  Last year John Means averaged 155 pitches per nine.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poignant obituary in the NY Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/26/obituaries/steve-dalkowski-dead.html?searchResultPosition=1

Quote

Shelton reflected on Dalkowski’s life in an article for The Los Angeles Times in 2009.

“It’s the gift from the gods — the arm, the power,” he wrote. “That is what haunts us. He had it all and didn’t know it. That’s why Steve Dalkowski stays in our minds. He had the equivalent of Michelangelo’s gift but could never finish a painting.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
    • If you pitch Bradish on 5 days rest you'd pitch Rodriguez on 3 days rest?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...