Jump to content

Could the new Yankee Stadium actually be a deterrent?


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

Think about it. The Yankees have always been a baseball treasure, full of history, and part of that history was Yankee Stadium.

That was something that was always special to FA's I think, playing on the same field as Mantle, Ruth and Gehrig. Now that's no longer the case as the field they will step on is no longer hallowed ground. There are no memories there, just fresh steel and concrete, a ripoff of the old Stadium trying to recreate that feel.

All the Yankees have to offer now is $ as just about everybody has a new stadium. I think a big part of their sales pitch is now gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the fans won't care either. Granted, they'll miss the old place, but they'll FILL that sucker too... every. single. night. ;)

I know but I don't think it will have the same vibe. It will be more of a corporate feel. I think it will be similar to the effect that happened when the Orioles moved from Memorial Stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAs won't give a flying fig that Yankee Stadium is gone. As long as the Yankees are still shelling out millions of dollars, they'll still sign plenty of free agents.

Even if the new ballpark turns out to have extreme park effects (i.e., it's a ridiculous hitter-friendly or pitcher-friendly park), it won't make a big difference as long as the cash is there. Keep in mind that guys like Mike Hampton and Denny Neagle willingly signed with the Rockies to pitch at Coors Field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the prices that that the seats are going be going for, FA will care less, because they will be getting a ton of $$$... those $250 seats behind home plate, will now cost $500 to $2500. And lets not forget to factor in the 47 luxury suites (29 leased already as of March 2008).

The new ballpark is going to be a cash cow!

From a March 2008 ESPN article - Seats behind home plate at the Yankees new stadium cost $500-$2,500

The New York Yankees will charge $500 to $2,500 for seats near home plate in the first five-to-eight rows of their new ballpark. They already have commitments from ticket-buyers for all 122 of the front-row seats.
The new ballpark will have 1,800 Legends Field Suite seats in 25 sections ringing home plate, with seats 20 feet closer to the infield than the current stadium. Food and nonalcoholic drinks are included in the ticket price, and there will be a private entrance, elevator and concourse.
There will be 1,200 Main Level Outdoor Suite seats in nine sections behind the plate priced at $350 to more than $500 next year, Trost said, with fans having to buy them for four, six, eight and 10 years. There will be 1,300 Terrace Level Outdoor Suite seats in nine sections behind the plate costing $100, $115 and $135, and fans must commit to them for two, four, six, eight or 10 seasons.

New York has lease commitments for 29 of 47 luxury suites in the new ballpark at prices from $600,000 and $850,000, and will have a 74-seat Club Suite priced at $700 per ticket, food (but not alcohol) included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAs won't give a flying fig that Yankee Stadium is gone. As long as the Yankees are still shelling out millions of dollars, they'll still sign plenty of free agents.

Even if the new ballpark turns out to have extreme park effects (i.e., it's a ridiculous hitter-friendly or pitcher-friendly park), it won't make a big difference as long as the cash is there. Keep in mind that guys like Mike Hampton and Denny Neagle willingly signed with the Rockies to pitch at Coors Field.

Naw, Hampton signed there because of the Denver schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it. The Yankees have always been a baseball treasure, full of history, and part of that history was Yankee Stadium.

That was something that was always special to FA's I think, playing on the same field as Mantle, Ruth and Gehrig. Now that's no longer the case as the field they will step on is no longer hallowed ground. There are no memories there, just fresh steel and concrete, a ripoff of the old Stadium trying to recreate that feel.

All the Yankees have to offer now is $ as just about everybody has a new stadium. I think a big part of their sales pitch is now gone.

Fools falling for bunkum. Nobody played on the same field as Mantle, Ruth and Gehrig, unless they played on the same teams as Mantle, Ruth or Gehrig. You really think they left the same grass and/or dirt on the field for 80+ years?

I don't.

They were playing in a park built by NYC in the mid-seventies on the site of Yankee $tadium. Nothing more or less. With no more or less history than that. May as well have called it $teinbrenner - Koch Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...