Jump to content

Sunday June 13: Orioles try to avoid sweep at Rays


SteveA

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Beysbol said:

Don't know why they would rather pitch to Arozarena. He's a great hitter. 

Meadows is pretty good in his own right.  I get why you load the bases, you get a grounder and you're out of the inning.  

It just seems that strategy hardly ever works for us.  Especially down 3-1, the game is still in reach (kinda, lets be honest that's an insurmountable lead for us against the Rays) but you just run the risk of letting them break the game wide open.

I'd be more supportive of that strategy if we had an absolutely lights out reliever who was ground ball dominant.  Not a guy who was hot for the first month of the season and has been running on fumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Get rid of Valdez. If we're going to have crap pitchers, they should be young guys who have some possibility of getting better and being useful in the future, even if the chance of that is tiny. The chance of Valdez being useful in the future is zero.

I agree.  It was fun while it lasted, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every game has me pondering the guys we should get rid of. There’s the list of guys we should get rid of regardless like Severino and Franco. And then there’s the guys who are trending from average to mediocre to awful, and this game it’s Valdez and Lakins.

I don’t know who is next up from the Minors but bring them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Philip said:

So it seems that Lakins and Valdez are not long for the Orioles.

Meanwhile, why is Mullins sitting today?

The official word was that Mullins is not hurt and the manager just wanted to give him a day off.

He had two hits in Saturday's game, so it's not like he's in an extended slump at the plate.  And he had two days off on Monday and Thursday when the team did not play, so it's not like he's exhausted from playing an excessive number of days in a row.

But the official word was that it was considered a good idea to give him the day off today, so that's why he was sitting.

It did give D. J. Stewart a chance to get into the lineup and he was 50% of the Orioles' offense with one of the team's two hits, so I guess that's one small positive.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...