Jump to content

McKenna has himself a day


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

You did an excellent job of bringing a .940 OPS to the table without mentioning it was in 67 at bats.  

Anyone with half a brain would know that it wasn't a full season or anything close to it with how much McKenna has been up and down this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I wasn't suggesting that McKenna would become something special, just that it's way to early to label him "nothing more than a 4th outfielder".  Again, he was putting up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.   He shows bat speed, some power, speed and defense.    He probably has more tools than most.

Is it his .154 average, .256 SLG, 37.8% whiff rate against pitches grouped as fastballs or his .000 ISO on any fastball on the inner half of the plate that makes you think he has good bat speed?

Maybe it's his 86.1 EV (88.3 MLB avg) overall that makes you think he has good bat speed?

Maybe it's his .100 AVG and .108 XBA and 50% whiff rate on 4-seam fastballs so far this year?

Or maybe you are letting you eyes dictate what you believe when it's the easiest tricked way of "scouting" a player?

I have to scout off my eyes in the minors but Baseball savant tells me everything I need to know off major leaguers. 

Whether it's officially "slow bat speed" or his inability to make quick swing decisions and get the barrel to the ball on high velocity, McKenna has absolutely not hit velocity this year and that matches up what I saw in the minors when I've been questioning his bat long before most pundits have.

Saying all that, at some point he will start cheating to get to the fastball and will have a little success until they adjust and start mixing in more breaking pitches which will give him fits. 

He does bring outstanding defense and speed to the team so I do think if he can have a little success at the plate that he can be a good 4th/5th outfielder.



 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Is it his .154 average, .256 SLG, 37.8% whiff rate against pitches grouped as fastballs or his .000 ISO on any fastball on the inner half of the plate that makes you think he has good bat speed?

Maybe it's his 86.1 EV (88.3 MLB avg) overall that makes you think he has good bat speed.

Maybe it's his .100 AVG and .108 XBA and 50% whiff rate on 4-seam fastballs so far this year?

Or maybe you are letting you eyes dictate what you believe when it's the easiest tricked way of "scouting" a player.

I have scout off my eyes in the minors but Baseball savant tells me everything I need to know off major leaguers. 

Whether it's officially "slow bat speed" or his inability to make quick swing decisions and get the barrel to the bet on high velocity, McKenna has absolutely not hit velocity this year and that matches up what I saw in the minors when I've been questioning his bat long before most pundits have.

Saying all that, at some point he will start cheating to get to the fastball and will have a little success until they adjust and start mixing in more breaking pitches which will give him fits. 

He does bring outstanding defense and speed to the team so I do think he can have a little success that he can be a good 4th/5th outfielder.



 

Then it's been decided.  Nothing more than a 4th OF.   Got it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, well, you know what they say when you assume...

 

 

I didn't assume.   I expected knowledgeable posters to realize that McKenna has been up and down this season and couldn't possibly have 200 AB's down in the minors at this point.    I never said he put up a .940 OPS over a full season to this point.    All I said was that he was putting up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way too early to make any definitive judgements on Mckenna. Young players have had a tough go of it this year with the lack of minor league seasons last year and I'd imagine it's a lot tougher if you've been on the Norfolk shuffle and hardly start back to back games. A 0.6 bWAR in 50 games is encouraging from him no matter how you slice it. His speed and defense definitely plays at the big league level and I think he has a decent eye at the plate. I'd like to see him given the time to adjust to ML pitchers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Sorry I haven't memorized McKenna's minor league stats and where he's been and how long he's been there before.

This is hilarious, look at the argument you're making.  "I said THIS but I never SAID THAT and YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN."

 

Hopefully, more objective posters can just look at the original posts when all I said that it's too soon to call McKenna only a 4th outfielder and that he had put up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.   I didn't try to mislead anyone.     Now that your Corn's butt boy I guess this is your new schtick.   LOL

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

 

I didn't assume.   I expected knowledgeable posters to realize that McKenna has been up and down this season and couldn't possibly have 200 AB's down in the minors at this point.    I never said he put up a .940 OPS over a full season to this point.    All I said was that he was putting up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.

One thing about it, I think he all ultimately be a 4th OF but he will have a plenty of opportunities to show otherwise with this team. There's really no one in the corners that is a guarantee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Hopefully, more objective posters can just look at the original posts when all I said that it's too soon to call McKenna only a 4th outfielder and that he had put up a .940 OPS at Norfolk.   I didn't try to mislead anyone.     Now that your Corn's butt boy I guess this is your new schtick.   LOL

Ohhhh RZNJ, resident tough guy.  I’m shaking in my boots. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...