Jump to content

M's, Bedard agree to 1-year deal


O's84

Recommended Posts

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3846940

Some info from the article:

Bedard will be guaranteed $7.75 million. He could bump that to $8.35 million by pitching at least 205 innings. Bedard's incentives break down this way:

He would earn an additional $75,000 by reaching 150 innings, an additional $100,000 for reaching 165 innings, another $150,000 for reaching 180 innings, another $125,000 for reaching 195 innings and an additional $150,000 for making it to 205 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope he does well... though I won't lie that it was a bit fulfilling to watch him live out the M's worst fears. We got a TON for Bedard and it was the right decision as he's a huge injury risk.

That being said, IMO he's still one of the most entertaining pitchers to watch and it would be nice to see him have a bounce back year.

(Certainly for fantasy reasons as I have him as a big sleeper this year :D)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope he does well... though I won't lie that it was a bit fulfilling to watch him live out the M's worst fears. We got a TON for Bedard and it was the right decision as he's a huge injury risk.

That being said, IMO he's still one of the most entertaining pitchers to watch and it would be nice to see him have a bounce back year.

(Certainly for fantasy reasons as I have him as a big sleeper this year :D)

I've read similar statements from various posters here and it is beyond me to understand how it could be "fulfilling" to watch a man become injured and fail. Perhaps you can give me some perspective that wouldn't make you sound petty and mean.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shocked he got that much.
Then you don't really understand how the arbitration process work.

He wasn't going to get a decrease. $7.75M is only a $750k increase from last year. Very reasonable for a guy who pitched very well when he was healthy, but missed most of the year. I'm actually surprised he didn't get more, he still managed to pitch 81 innings at a 3.67 ERA, its not like he missed the entire season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read similar statements from various posters here and it is beyond me to understand how it could be "fulfilling" to watch a man become injured and fail. Perhaps you can give me some perspective that wouldn't make you sound petty and mean.

It's not so much about him actually getting injured. It's more about his injury validating that we traded him at the right time, at his peak value. Don't get me wrong, even if he had pitched well last season it would still have been the right move to trade him. It's just that his injury makes it look like an absolute steal from the O's perspective. It's not very often that the Orioles pulls one over on another organization, and that's what some people are feeling "fulfilled" by.

I don't personally get any kind of enjoyment out of seeing Bedard fail, but I can understand where it comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you don't really understand how the arbitration process work.

He wasn't going to get a decrease. $7.75M is only a $750k increase from last year. Very reasonable for a guy who pitched very well when he was healthy, but missed most of the year. I'm actually surprised he didn't get more, he still managed to pitch 81 innings at a 3.67 ERA, its not like he missed the entire season.

I didn't, thanks for clearing that up. I guess this year it's better to be an arbitration eligible pitcher like Bedard than a free agent like Sheets. Somewhere Varitek is asking the Red Sox front office if he can his arbitration deal back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somewhere Varitek is asking the Red Sox front office if he can his arbitration deal back.
You nailed it here. I think he would love to settle for a 1/$10M deal from the Sox at this point.

Arbitration for FAs and arbitration for guys with less than 6 years service time is slightly different, though. The Red Sox could have offered him more than a 20% decrease (the max decrease year-to-year in under-6 guys), and probably have won the case, especially after the way this offseason has gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't' date=' thanks for clearing that up. I guess this year it's better to be an arbitration eligible pitcher like Bedard than a free agent like Sheets.[/quote']

And to have a team which wasn't willing to non-tender him, thereby conceding that they got nothing from that trade.

Pretty high hurdle on the incentives, without much of a reward. I'll be very surprised if Bedard manages 200 innings in 2009, coming off an injury like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...