Jump to content

David Wells Fires Back at Torre


scOtt

Recommended Posts

"Wells, who has not read the book but plans to buy one when it becomes available next week,..."

What do you think, David? Couldn't you have waited a week or two until you actually had a copy of the book to go shooting off your mouth.

But he doesn't need to read the book to understand the hypocrisy of Torre writing this book after being pissed at Giambi for the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, let me get this straight: He's mad at Torre about the book. He himself wrote a similar book. He is in fact so mad that he is going to give Torre royalty money by buying a copy of the book he doesn't like.

Color me confused.

I pre-ordered this yesterday for $14. I only buy books I think I'll read more than once, and this one qualifies. I love this type of book. And Verducci is a good writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he doesn't need to read the book to understand the hypocrisy of Torre writing this book after being pissed at Giambi for the same thing.

If he hasn't read the book, how does he know what's in it?

It's already clear that Verducci wrote the book, not Torre. Torre receives a percentage of the royalties in exchange for being listed on the cover as the "coauthor", but we don't know if Torre had any editorial control over what is in the book or not. The issue is how much of the material in the book is attributable to Torre, and it's difficult to determine that from tabloid reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he hasn't read the book, how does he know what's in it?

It's already clear that Verducci wrote the book, not Torre. Torre receives a percentage of the royalties in exchange for being listed on the cover as the "coauthor", but we don't know if Torre had any editorial control over what is in the book or not. The issue is how much of the material in the book is attributable to Torre, and it's difficult to determine that from tabloid reviews.

Excerpts have been published. Even out of context quotes can show that Torre is revealing clubhouse information.

And it's not about who wrote the book. It's about Torre making the information public, which he most certainly did, even if this isn't his book. Unless you think that every one of the included clubhouse stories were ones that Torre told to Verducci in confidentiality, then Torre is responsible for the information going public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excerpts have been published. Even out of context quotes can show that Torre is revealing clubhouse information.

And it's not about who wrote the book. It's about Torre making the information public, which he most certainly did, even if this isn't his book. Unless you think that every one of the included clubhouse stories were ones that Torre told to Verducci in confidentiality, then Torre is responsible for the information going public.

Wells was in the employ of the Yankees at the time he kissed and told. Torre was not. Principled or no, that's more than a hair-splitting difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excerpts have been published. Even out of context quotes can show that Torre is revealing clubhouse information.

According to Verducci, there wasn't a single "quote" by Torre in the entire book. Although a certain amount of the information was undoubtedly provided by Torre, it's written in the third person, and the information could have come from almost anyone.

Unless you think that every one of the included clubhouse stories were ones that Torre told to Verducci in confidentiality,...

We really don't know, do we? Verducci was around the clubhouse a lot; he could have mined dozens or even hundreds of sources in addition to Torre, and most of the stories he got from Torre may have been derived from interviews prior to the initiation of the book.

I'm content to wait until I've read the book before drawing too many conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ordered my copy this afternoon (along with Tim Dorsey's latest Nuclear Jellyfish). Can't wait for it to arrive. I'm sure I'll be disappointed: nothing short of tales of Yankee$ executives dining on roasted babies would satisfy my loathing for that organization. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ordered my copy this afternoon (along with Tim Dorsey's latest Nuclear Jellyfish). Can't wait for it to arrive. I'm sure I'll be disappointed: nothing short of tales of Yankee$ executives dining on roasted babies would satisfy my loathing for that organization. :eek:

Roasted, dead, clubbed baby seals. With a shallot garlic white wine reduction sauce, would be to die for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • A couple of things that I find interesting, Yaqui Rivera - Acquired in the Tanner Scott/Cole Sulser trade with the Marlins. Juan Nunez - Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade.   Creed Willems - still only 20 and already in A+.  He got off to a big start last year as well and then struggled the rest of the year.  We're a little spoiled with prospect success from the college guys and HS phenoms Mayo, Holliday, and Gunnar.  The HS position players take some time.  
    • Perez threw an inning of rehab last night with Norfolk.  His velocity was down about 1.5 MPH on his sinker, and everything was down a tick, but he was getting some work in and doesn't look too far away from being ready.
    • I don’t trust that guy to be very useful despite the strong start. He’s a good regression candidate. Would rather have Kopech. 
    • O's have Fabian behind Bradfield and Mullins will likely decline after '25 when he becomes a FA. I think one of those two should be able to hold down CF. Beavers could be in the mix as well.
    • Its a total joke that Wagner isn’t it in yet. 
    • I see no dilemma. He’s under team control right now during his best season’s. When he becomes a FA he will be out of his prime. I mean I love Mullins as a player and what he brings. But when we are talking about priorities for extensions, he is nowhere near the top considering you have an MVP caliber 22 year old, an ultra talented top prospect who is 20, and your team leader is 25. Those 3 are the engine that will drive this bus toward postseason glory most probably, not Cedric Mullins. If the Yanks want to give him that kind of contract while we retain 2 out of the 3 if Henderson, Rutschman, and Holliday; then so be it!  What I shudder to think about is a prime Henderson or Holliday crushing it for one of our competitors so that we can have a declining CF. Didn’t we just do that the last go around? Where we choose to resign the (predictably) declining player while we let the younger/more talented player leave? Yes, I agree that Bradfield Jr’s development is important. But since Elias/Sig have been here they haven’t struck out on any first round picks. Also, if Bradfield proves to be a bust, they can always draft and/or develop another CF type.
    • Thanks, I missed that detail probably multi-tasking in the game thread. I do think Kimbrel has a good shot*...Wagner should go in next cycle, and the electorate in the coming years will be wrestling with how Epstein, Friedman, etc. have improved per pitch efficiency by downsizing the workload literally any individual pitcher can shoulder.      There can't not be any Hall of Famers with all this run prevention going on.    I think now that he's officially retired Strasburg will be a good debate.    Bumgarner too, though I don't believe I've seen that guy yet admitting any retirement. *better shot if say he can get the last out of an important postseason series or three in 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...