Jump to content

What are your expectations for Grayson Rodriguez in 2024?


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

 

 

1. Throw his SL and CH more. His SL is a weapon against RH batters and his CH is effective against LH batters.

2. Throw the 4SFB a bit less but throw it up in the zone with a focus of hitting the top of the zone consistently.

3. Shelve the cutter or only throw it rarely. 

This is just my $0.02. Take it for what it's worth...

Great post! That is exactly what he did when he came back from AAA.  He got cutter happy in the first half and it was crushed.  He was often behind and when he threw the FB, and it got hit hard (although he still got 24% WHIFF so it wasn't like it was useless).  His CH & SL are incredible pitches, and he throws them at almost the same speed, from the same release point, and they dart in two different directions.  His curve is pretty darn good as well, but he doesn't use it much.  I think he has trouble commanding the 55.8" 👀 of vertical drop and misses low more often than not.  He has problems controlling the curve, but it's an awesome change of pace/show me pitch to keep batters honest.  I think that's likely a pitch that he could use more as a weapon.  The speed differential from the FB(97) and CU/SL(83) is pretty wide and can help it play if he's tunneling his pitches which he did very well in the second half.   The cutter might help him a bit because it sits right in between the fastball and CU/SL @ 89mph ~7mph slower than the FB and ~7mph faster than the CU/SL.  He just needs to be judicious when using it.  

Edited by emmett16
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, btdart20 said:

Cole was under Ray Searage’s “pitch to contact” tutelage in Pittsburg.  Cole improved so much when he went to Houston and NYY.

As for Grayson’s 2024 expectations:  185+ IP, 15+ W, 3.00 ERA, 1.10 WHIP, 250+ Ks

Not all SSS are created equal.

From you lips to God's ears.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, emmett16 said:

I don't think he was trolling.  He was trying to make a valid point.  And I have to admit, I quite enjoyed the trip down memory road and looking at how an old Oriole's career turned out.  

I'll often give a pithy off the cuff comment as a counterpoint to what I view as weak arguments.

The idea that Grayson's strong second half ensures continued success is something I don't agree with.

I'm a Grayson fan but it isn't that simple in the real world.

Some folks don't care for that style of posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll often give a pithy off the cuff comment as a counterpoint to what I view as weak arguments.

The idea that Grayson's strong second half ensures continued success is something I don't agree with.

I'm a Grayson fan but it isn't that simple in the real world.

Some folks don't care for that style of posting.

Pith away, my friend.  I dig it.  I agree with the sentiment, but I think he has the mental fortitude and the physical tools to continue on that trajectory.  I don't think luck played into it.  However, there are a lot of variables which is why I said his success is going to depend on his health.  Ther are so many things that could derail his success even with the talent, tools, and make-up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll often give a pithy off the cuff comment as a counterpoint to what I view as weak arguments.

The idea that Grayson's strong second half ensures continued success is something I don't agree with.

I'm a Grayson fan but it isn't that simple in the real world.

Some folks don't care for that style of posting.

It appears to me that you enjoy the role of the contrarian. It gives you joy to pick apart another poster's ideas. I find it ironic that you would describe your responses as pithy while others find them to be troll-like. It makes me chuckle.

I take no offense from your approach and appreciate your willingness to engage in the conversation. Rock on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

It appears to me that you enjoy the role of the contrarian. It gives you joy to pick apart another poster's ideas. I find it ironic that you would describe your responses as pithy while others find them to be troll-like. It makes me chuckle.

I take no offense from your approach and appreciate your willingness to engage in the conversation. Rock on.

I was using the brief-terse definition for pithy. 

I thought adding in "off the cuff" would imply that I don't consider those comments to be "full of vigor, substance or meaning".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I was using the brief-terse definition for pithy. 

I thought adding in "off the cuff" would imply that I don't consider those comments to be "full of vigor, substance or meaning".

Never sure if your last name is Webster or Roget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Tony-OH how do you think Grayson does next year?  Do you think the second half was more of a good stretch with some luck?  Or do you think it’s a preview of what’s to come next year?  Do you think he took most of his growing pain lumps last year -or- that there are still some lumps/hurdles to overcome before truly breaking out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest things for Grayson we're his significant improvement in walk rate and barrel rate from 1H to 2H.

Walk rate from 10% to 6.9%

Barrel rate from 12% down to 4%

He ditched a mediocre cutter in favor of his better 4S (prolly helped his barrel rate the most), and threw far many more pitches in-zone in 2H.

For example: Four-seam zone rate 1H: 54% 2H: 59.5%

slider zone rate 1H: 36% 2H: 48%

zone rate isn't everything, but when your stuff is as good as his, it behooves you to be in or around the zone and minimize the easy takes for hitters.

I'd be optimistic enough that he has a better handle on his pitch mix and a stronger action plan to attack hitters now.

 

edit: I just checked his swinging strike rates and he substantially increased his rate on the slide from 1H to 2H 12.% to 18.6%.  More strikes, more swings and misses - pretty straightforward correlation I'd reckon when your slider stuff is so good.

 

Edited by nvpacchi
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...