Jump to content

Gunner and Adley


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, HowAboutThat said:

Holliday won’t sign an extension, but I wouldn’t give him one until he shows his defense is worth it.

At this point, I'm comfortable locking at Holliday as a solid regular, Brian Roberts type but you get perennial All Star/MVP upside.  If there is an extension for about 10 years, $100 mill, I'm jumping on it.  When a player has proven he can perform at the ceiling he was projected at, there are no more discounts.  How much more would the Royals had to pay by waiting for Witt to show his bat is really good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunnar absolutely should be signed to a 10 or 12 year contract. He's a franchise player and athlete.

I've never been in favor of an Adley extension because he'll be a 30-year old catcher in his first season of his new deal (assuming he plays this one out). It never makes sense to give big money to catchers past 30-years old.

Now depending on his performance and what the system has to offer by 2028, I might be open to a few years extension, but I don't see the Orioles needing to do anything be go to arbitration with Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s their MO.   We never tend to hear about nagging injuries that guys are playing through until the year is over.  

Let's hope you're right.  Adley is a big part of this team. Let's hope it's injury related and he comes back strong next year if not the rest of this year 

Edited by Baseball fandom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Gunnar absolutely should be signed to a 10 or 12 year contract. He's a franchise player and athlete.

I've never been in favor of an Adley extension because he'll be a 30-year old catcher in his first season of his new deal (assuming he plays this one out). It never makes sense to give big money to catchers past 30-years old.

Now depending on his performance and what the system has to offer by 2028, I might be open to a few years extension, but I don't see the Orioles needing to do anything be go to arbitration with Adley.

As SG has been pointing out the bat is concerning. If the bat was more viable at least you can move him to DH or possibly 1B to salvage some value out of the deal sort of like the Twins did with Mauer. So as much as it pains me to say they may need to walk away from him on a long term deal and that stinks knowing with 20/20 hindsight the Orioles could of had Witt 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I put more on the idea that he usually bats righty as a DH than anything else.

Thats the clear difference to me.

I do think that might be a James McCann byproduct.    If next year's backup catcher is a left handed hitter, it might go the other way.    The Orioles/Hyde chase the Left-Right advantage a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s the rush on extensions?  If they are not taking hometown discounts, then playing out remaining pre-arb/arb years and then determining FA years may be best financial and business decision for Os.  Passage of time and years will inform whether Adley is just above average and whether Gunnar is Witt or a notch below.  Worst case on Adley is FA 2028 and Gunnar FA 2029. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Say O! said:

What’s the rush on extensions?  If they are not taking hometown discounts, then playing out remaining pre-arb/arb years and then determining FA years may be best financial and business decision for Os.  Passage of time and years will inform whether Adley is just above average and whether Gunnar is Witt or a notch below.  Worst case on Adley is FA 2028 and Gunnar FA 2029. 

Why is Witt any more proven than Gunnar? Just because his 2024 is better? Gunnar is still on pace for an elite season all time for any SS and he is 23 years old. Dont forget Gunnar was on pace for the highest WAR season ever by a SS into June. Witt has been on an unbelievable heater and has established himself for sure, but Gunnar is certainly in that conversation as 1a/1b for best young shortstop in the game. To that point, Gunnar has accumulated more career WAR than Witt and is a year younger, and has played less. Gunnar and Witt are both generational.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...