Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It should be a fun exercise to do a shadow draft, which is simply listing who you would have taken as each Orioles pick was up for selection.

Let's try to keep it simple and go Seven Rounds and it should be fun to look back upon it to see how we did. :)

First, the actual picks...

1. Matt Hobgood

2. Mychal Givens

3. Tyler Townsend

4. Randy Henry

5. Ashur Tolliver

6. Justin Dalles

7. Aaron Wirsch

My picks...

1. Grant Green, SS, USC (Matzek rated just ahead of Green, but perceived signability issues have me thinking Green here.)

2. Garrett Gould, RHP, HS (KS)

3. Max Stassi, C, HS (CA)

4. Jeff Malm, 1B, HS (NV)

5. Dan Tuttle, RHP, HS (NC)

6. Danny Fields, SS, HS (MI)

7. Ian Krol, LHP, HS (IL) (I would've taken Josh Leyland, C, HS (CA) here, but with Stassi already aboard, I went Krol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be a fun exercise to do a shadow draft, which is simply listing who you would have taken as each Orioles pick was up for selection.

Let's try to keep it simple and go Seven Rounds and it should be fun to look back upon it to see how we did. :)

First, the actual picks...

1. Matt Hobgood

2. Mychal Givens

3. Tyler Townsend

4. Randy Henry

5. Ashur Tolliver

6. Justin Dalles

7. Aaron Wirsch

My picks...

1. Grant Green, SS, USC (Matzek rated just ahead of Green, but perceived signability issues have me thinking Green here.)

2. Garrett Gould, RHP, HS (KS)

3. Max Stassi, C, HS (CA)

4. Jeff Malm, 1B, HS (NV)

5. Dan Tuttle, RHP, HS (NC)

6. Danny Fields, SS, HS (MI)

7. Ian Krol, LHP, HS (IL)

I'm not sure the ultimate value of the exercise post draft, as people are now aware of who would be available and for how long. No?

Anyway, here was my ten done during the draft:

1:5 -- Zack Wheeler, RHP, E. Paulding HS (GA)

2:5 -- Todd Glaesmann, OF, Midway HS (TX)

3:5 -- Chris Dominguez, 3B/1B, Louisville

4:5 -- Dustin Dickerson, 1B, Baylor Univ.

5:5 -- Ian Krol, LHP, Neuqua HS (IL)

6:5 -- Madison Younginer, RHP, Mauldin HS (SC)

7:5 -- Brody Colvin, RHP, St. Thom. More HS (LA)

8:5 -- Kendal Volz, RHP, Baylor Univ.

9:5 -- Ryan Berry, RHP, Rice Univ.

10:5 -- Sam Dyson, RHP, Univ. of S. Carolina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it should be called the hindsight draft ;)

1. Matt Hobgood

2. Mychal Givens

3. Tyler Townsend

4. Randy Henry

5. Ashur Tolliver

6. Justin Dalles

7. Aaron Wirsch

Mine:

1. Zach Wheeler - would have said Matzek, but I'll split the money difference to spend some later.

2. Tom Mendonca

3. Chris Dominquez

4. Kent Matthes

5. Jeff Malm

6. Brian Moran

7. Ian Krol

P.S. - I love your 8-10 Stotle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it should be called the hindsight draft ;)

1. Matt Hobgood

2. Mychal Givens

3. Tyler Townsend

4. Randy Henry

5. Ashur Tolliver

6. Justin Dalles

7. Aaron Wirsch

Mine:

1. Zach Wheeler - would have said Matzek, but I'll split the money difference to spend some later.

2. Tom Mendonca

3. Chris Dominquez

4. Kent Matthes

5. Jeff Malm

6. Brian Moran

7. Ian Krol

P.S. - I love your 8-10 Stotle

Thanks -- jealous you get Mendonca (he's a better bet than Dominguez, to me). Here is my hindsight seven (or simply what we would have done had I been smart enough to not change Craw and my plans from last night...:():

1. Wheeler

2. Glaesmann

3. Dominguez

4. Stassi

5. Dickerson

6. Krol

7. Colvin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks -- jealous you get Mendonca (he's a better bet than Dominguez, to me). Here is my hindsight seven (or simply what we would have done had I been smart enough to not change Craw and my plans from last night...:():

1. Wheeler

2. Glaesmann

3. Dominguez

4. Stassi

5. Dickerson

6. Krol

7. Colvin

Nice. Last night I would have gone with the 1-3 I posted given who was still out there, would have taken Matthes in the 4th today, probably would have taken Krol in the 5th though, I think the 7th was a little low for him. Meh, what do I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. Last night I would have gone with the 1-3 I posted given who was still out there, would have taken Matthes in the 4th today, probably would have taken Krol in the 5th though, I think the 7th was a little low for him. Meh, what do I know.

I pegged him Rounds 5-8 with 2nd or 3rd round money (as what I would offer). Once he was around at 5:5 I jumped. Obviously, two picks too early...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same comment as last year - even the Pentagon would be jealous of the proposed spend above.

Money for the draft should not be a factor for the Orioles whatsoever.

If we can blow $15 million on retreads we can blow $15 million on the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money for the draft should not be a factor for the Orioles whatsoever.

If we can blow $15 million on retreads we can blow $15 million on the draft.

If you spend more $ than any major league team in the draft, then there's no basis in reality for the exercise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same comment as last year - even the Pentagon would be jealous of the proposed spend above.

I think that's an incorrect critique. I don't agree with the picks, per se -- you probably have to give Malm way more than he is now worth to buy him out of USC, for example -- but what's wrong with this approach so long as you note you may only end up signing half the guys?

That, I think, would be the correct analysis. How does Matzek, Seager, Townsend, Moran match-up against the actual top seven? Swap Matzek for Hobgood or perhaps Wheeler and you have room for one or two of Stassi/Malm/Krol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you spend more $ than any major league team in the draft, then there's no basis in reality for the exercise.
What about the Rangers draft of Purke, Scheppers, Mendonca, etc? What about the Nats by simply drafting Strasburg? To me, Jtrea's picks aren't outlandish at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure the ultimate value of the exercise post draft, as people are now aware of who would be available and for how long. No?

Anyway, here was my ten done during the draft:

1:5 -- Zack Wheeler, RHP, E. Paulding HS (GA)

2:5 -- Todd Glaesmann, OF, Midway HS (TX)

3:5 -- Chris Dominguez, 3B/1B, Louisville

4:5 -- Dustin Dickerson, 1B, Baylor Univ.

5:5 -- Ian Krol, LHP, Neuqua HS (IL)

6:5 -- Madison Younginer, RHP, Mauldin HS (SC)

7:5 -- Brody Colvin, RHP, St. Thom. More HS (LA)

8:5 -- Kendal Volz, RHP, Baylor Univ.

9:5 -- Ryan Berry, RHP, Rice Univ.

10:5 -- Sam Dyson, RHP, Univ. of S. Carolina

That's true, but I know who I would have prefered at each pick (going by my personal board)... and didn't take into account where they went eventually. But you are correct that for some posters it may be perceived that way. I was too tied up last night to do this thread live. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true, but I know who I would have prefered at each pick (going by my personal board)... and didn't take into account where they went eventually. But you are correct that for some posters it may be perceived that way. I was too tied up last night to do this thread live. :o

Oh, I didn't mean you, Greg. I could see you weren't taking that into account. It was a general musing, that's all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's an incorrect critique. I don't agree with the picks, per se -- you probably have to give Malm way more than he is now worth to buy him out of USC, for example -- but what's wrong with this approach so long as you note you may only end up signing half the guys?

That, I think, would be the correct analysis. How does Matzek, Seager, Townsend, Moran match-up against the actual top seven? Swap Matzek for Hobgood or perhaps Wheeler and you have room for one or two of Stassi/Malm/Krol.

Why is it an incorrect critique when you follow that statement up admitting the guys can't be signed or should be swapped out?

If one is drafting combinations of guys that are in excess of what teams are spending in reality, then it's a wish list - not an exercise worth judging against what real GMs do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...