Jump to content

Number Four Prospect: 3B - Josh Bell


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Not to mention that he has steadily improved at every single level he has risen to. You can see his stuff is getting better as his K rate continues to climb every year. Its also said that he could add more velocity as he fills out his frame.

One thing is for sure, if Arrieta showed development the same way Britton does, hed be a surefire #1 SP....

Performance-wise . . . Arrieta's hiccup was only during his promotion this summer to AAA. He threw better at AA than HiA. I still think Arrieta probably ranges somewhere between a closer type to a mid rotation guy. I certainly can understand why Britton's promise could outshine Arrieta as a prospect. Quite a few folks doubt Arrieta within our realm here and out in the trade journals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Performance-wise . . . Arrieta's hiccup was only during his promotion this summer to AAA. He threw better at AA than HiA. I still think Arrieta probably ranges somewhere between a closer type to a mid rotation guy. I certainly can understand why Britton's promise could outshine Arrieta as a prospect. Quite a few folks doubt Arrieta within our realm here and out in the trade journals.

My thing with Arrieta is that the same problems he had when he was drafted are the same ones he has now. He needed to work on his secondaries and improve his command....He has made progress with his changeup, fastball command and making the slider mor consistent, but his command overall still is lacking, and his changeup is still a work in progress. Still though, a guy with a mid 90 fastball, plus slider and average changeup with average command can be mid rotation guys.

I feel Jake is the better prospect than Britton, but I do believe Britton will end up becoming the better prospect in his peak but that entails a bit more development.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thing with Arrieta is that the same problems he had when he was drafted are the same ones he has now. He needed to work on his secondaries and improve his command....He has made progress with his changeup, fastball command and making the slider mor consistent, but his command overall still is lacking, and his changeup is still a work in progress. Still though, a guy with a mid 90 fastball, plus slider and average changeup with average command can be mid rotation guys.

I feel Jake is the better prospect than Britton, but I do believe Britton will end up becoming the better prospect in his peak but that entails a bit more development.......

Right and I think part of that is the point at which they entered our system developmentally can affect how ones interprets skill trajectory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right and I think part of that is the point at which they entered our system developmentally can affect how ones interprets skill trajectory.

I agree. It could also be said that Britton had so much longer of a way to go compared to Jake. Jake is at the point where he really just needs some refinement on his stuff(secondaries and command) Britton, until the end of this season had a lot more to work on and that much more room for improvement. So, are you pretty much saying that Jake actually has developed a ton, and possibly even developed quicker than Britton, depending on where he started at, but mainly developed during his college years, so by the time that he was with a ML organization closer to fully baked, he didnt seem to make as much progress because he already did before he was under our microscope?

I look at it like theres 2 big parts to developing, the 1st part is establishing your stuff, your command, the overall game. Then the 2nd part of the development that comes later on is the refinement and polishing everything you have included in your overall game which can take longer than the 1st part and is all different for everyone. So, this expected development of the changeup and command of Britton could take longer than atleast I personally have been theorizing because the 2nd part is a whole different ball game. This part may not develop as quickly as the first part.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A combination of

1. A great combination of groundball//strikeout pitcher

2. Still young with room to get better.

3. Rave report from Tony.

Yeah, I know Britton and I'm aware of what he did this year; I was just unaware that anyone even considered it a debate as to whether or not he's a better prospect than Jake Arrieta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Crowley can do something with him from that side of the plate?

To me this is the best argument for having him in Baltimore this season as a platoon player. If the club wants him to remain a switch hitter, then it would make sense for him to spend as much time as possible working on his rightly stroke with the King of Swing. I think his righty swing would improve more working in the cage with Crowley and sitting on the bench against (most) lefties than it would getting regular reps against AAA lefty pitching. And he can get an occasional at bat or spot start against lefties in the majors, to try stuff out in a game situation.

If Bell or the club decides that it's best for him to give up switch hitting, then he should start the season at Norfolk. His hitting mechanics from the left side are already reportedly quite good, so there's less reason for him to work with Crowley...what he'll need is experience in reading pitches coming from lefties, and I think he'll get more of that experience with regular reps at Norfolk than he would working in the cage in Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this is the best argument for having him in Baltimore this season as a platoon player. If the club wants him to remain a switch hitter, then it would make sense for him to spend as much time as possible working on his rightly stroke with the King of Swing. I think his righty swing would improve more working in the cage with Crowley and sitting on the bench against (most) lefties than it would getting regular reps against AAA lefty pitching. And he can get an occasional at bat or spot start against lefties in the majors, to try stuff out in a game situation.

If Bell or the club decides that it's best for him to give up switch hitting, then he should start the season at Norfolk. His hitting mechanics from the left side are already reportedly quite good, so there's less reason for him to work with Crowley...what he'll need is experience in reading pitches coming from lefties, and I think he'll get more of that experience with regular reps at Norfolk than he would working in the cage in Baltimore.

I really doubt that any MLB hitting coach is so much better than the instruction he will get at AAA to justify sitting him on the bench for a year and wasting a year of service time. That would essentially cost us about $15M if he pans out.

I think the argument that "Hey, he struggles against LHP so lets promote him to the majors!" is one that lacks any sort of coherent logic behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read that Bell's stroke from the right side is vastly different from his stroke on the left side in that it looks different and his bat speed on the right side is nowhere near the left side. If this is true, wouldn't you want him hitting from the left side no matter what? I am not sure how big of an adjustment it would be for Bell hitting lefties from the left side, but it is not like his bat speed would go away. In my opinion, he may have more potential against lefties from the left side than the right because his swing is just so clean and generates so much bat speed from the left side. Does anyone know what type of adjustment that would be like for Bell to stop switch hitting? Are there any notable hitters that gave up switch hitting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read that Bell's stroke from the right side is vastly different from his stroke on the left side in that it looks different and his bat speed on the right side is nowhere near the left side. If this is true, wouldn't you want him hitting from the left side no matter what? I am not sure how big of an adjustment it would be for Bell hitting lefties from the left side, but it is not like his bat speed would go away. In my opinion, he may have more potential against lefties from the left side than the right because his swing is just so clean and generates so much bat speed from the left side. Does anyone know what type of adjustment that would be like for Bell to stop switch hitting? Are there any notable hitters that gave up switch hitting?

As ThreeRunHomer mentioned earlier, the big adjustment is in the different look of pitches. That's an adjustment, but not a huge one, and a lot of that can be made up in the cage with a lefty throwing BP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same reason that it is expected for Bryce Harper to be a #1 overall pick while still at this point being an HSer is because he has a beautiful swing and he has good mechanics(though it got loopy as he fatigued toward the end of summer). Scouts figure that he should be able to learn to hit ML pitching because he has a very good swing and excellent power even though hes never actually hit against true ML pitching before, yet they just know/assume he will be able to....

You could say the same for Bell against LHP from the left side, he has excellent mechanics, very quick swing, very good power and a good hit tool. These tools dont translate to a .500 OPS I dont care how you put it. IMO its worth the try.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...