Jump to content

SABR Creates New "Henry Chadwick Award": James, Ritter, Palmer Among Honorees


BaltimoreTerp

Recommended Posts

http://bats.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/baseball-historians-get-their-own-hall/

For almost 40 years, the Society for American Baseball Research has painstakingly unearthed and saluted the accomplishments of long-forgotten contributors to the game. Now it will honor the stars of its own: by creating, in effect, the Baseball Historian Hall of Fame.

SABR announced on Monday the inaugural class of winners of its new Henry Chadwick Award -– (fittingly) nine people whose work is far better known, even among casual fans, than most realize.

Bill James

Lawrence Ritter

Bill Neft

Lee Allen

Pete Palmer

Bob Davids

Peter Morris*

Harold Seymour

Jules Tygiel

*I've already managed to mention But Didn't We Have Fun twice in a short period of time, but I have to mention it again because it's by Peter Morris, which I just realized as I looked him up.

I think it's very nice that SABR is honoring people who won't get the same attention from the actual Hall of Fame due to the BBWAA. Over time, though, it will be interesting to see if the two groups end up either switching situations, or combining forces in some way that brings SABR closer to the Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I briefly glanced at the email I got from SABR on this the other day, but didn't pay a lot of attention. I don't know how much recognition this will get outside of the hardcore SABR community, but these are some huge, huge people. In the historian community all of these guy are like the initial HOF class of Ruth, Cobb, Young, Johnson, Wagner, Speaker.

I guess you can't go wrong with any of them. James is James, and his influence can hardly be overstated - he's probably caused more people to get interested in baseball analysis/history/research than anyone, ever. And, of course, he's written dozens of volumes of his own.

Harold Seymour is arguably even more important. He, along with Dorothy Seymour, wrote the series of books beginning with Baseball, The Early Years, which were the first serious, scholarly looks at baseball history. Quite literally, before that book came out there was no decent source for the history of early baseball. It took until the 70s or 80s for most of the big players of the 1800s to get into the Hall because, more-or-less, nobody knew a thing about them until Seymour.

Among the others I'm most familiar with the works of Palmer and Allen, but all of these guys have made a thousand imprints on the game, large and small. For example, without Lee Allen we just wouldn't know the birth and death dates of thousands of players. I think he actually had a column in the Sporting News in the 40s and 50s enlisting people to go out and find information on hundreds of forgotten old players.

And Davids founded SABR. The baseball world would be very, very different without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 10 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Posts

    • Twenty people believe there’s a trade before the season that changed the offseason? Hmm I said it when Elias was hired. Nothing of any significance will change until there’s new ownership.  Actually, I questioned his ability to perform his duties with the current ownership. I’m still waiting for an impact signing. However, I think they may have a chance with the young guys. Of course, that assumes a big season from Adley, Gunnar and GrayRod and it’s likely at least one of that group has growing pains.    I also hope Hall gets a real shot as a SP. Too many people didn’t recognize the strides he made in season and he’s always been a starter. His stint in the pen was useful, but that kid has electric stuff.  Don’t get me wrong, Elias has been ok, but how much could he do if they loosened the purse strings? Yes, I know, the Frazier signing, but how bout that Gibson guy!  
    • The biggest development of the season will be the sale of the team.
    • We will be fortunate if GRod has a sub 4 ERA. I don’t see him as any more important than the rest of the starters.  If he is ever a true ace (and the odds are against that), it won’t likely be in 2023. The biggest development to this year will be revolved around all the young players, not just one. Everything about this team and the future success of this organization hinges on them. 
    • I'd say that is a yes. https://www.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/service-time  
    • Unusual, in that Birds usually avoid both Fox and Wolf.
    • Why not keep Al and NL just make each have East and West Divisions. Al East is our current group plus Chicago WS and Cleveland plus an expansion in Charlotte-Nashville. AL west gets the rest NL east is that current group plus Chicago Cubs, Pittsburg, and Cincinnati. the west gets the rest plus an expansion in Vegas or wherever. You play your division 15 times (105 games) and the other division say 6 times (48 games). That gets you to 153, add a 3 game inter league to a close geographic rival (Gnats) you are at 156. Expand Playoffs so top 4 in each Division in. the top 2 advance to face the other geographic Division. league winners in WS
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...