Jump to content

Jimmy Paredes is a Phillie!


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Paredes has had a good 20 day rehab period. He has DHed, played 3B and some outfield. He has a 912 OPS at AAA and an 847 OPS in 65 at bats at Frederick, Bowie and Norfolk combined. But its decision time for the O's on Paredes and there is no room on the 25 man roster.

DFAing Paredes means he can be traded or claim on waivers. If no one claims him he can be outrighted to AAA. I am sure the O's would like to keep him in the organization. However, Jimmy has the right to refuse the assignment and become a free agent if not traded or claimed.

It seems likely that a 40 man roster spot will open up and Dan will be searching for someone to add to the major league roster.

Since November of 2013 Paredes has been DFAed four times by Astros, Marlins, O's and Royals. He has been claimed off waivers three times and the O's purchased his contract from the Royals in July of 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Roch's blog report on Jimmy:

Down on the farm, Jimmy Paredes is completing his injury rehab assignment today at Triple-A Norfolk. The Orioles must decide what to do with him.

There?s clearly no spot for him on the 25-man roster unless they?re willing to option Ryan Flaherty, who?s been their third baseman, or remove Paul Janish. They?ve gauged outside interest, including overseas.

The Orioles may have no choice except to designate Paredes for assignment, hope he clears waivers and accepts an outright assignment to Triple-A Norfolk.

If a team claimed Paredes, the Orioles could feel fortunate that they got so much out of him during the first half last season, when he hit .299/.332/.475 with 12 doubles, two triples and 10 home runs in 68 games.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2016/05/todays-game-and-pending-paredes-decision.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he'll be claimed, but I wouldn't think twice about designating him for assignment. We don't need him -- full stop. End of analysis.

Well, they have to DFA him or trade him. But I don't dismiss him like you. He is good depth. The O's didn't need Janish until Hardy went down. Now they are glad they have him. If Davis, Trumbo or Alvarez go down then the O's could use Paredes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they have to DFA him or trade him. But I don't dismiss him like you. He is good depth. The O's didn't need Janish until Hardy went down. Now they are glad they have him. If Davis, Trumbo or Alvarez go down then the O's could use Paredes.

How is a DH with a below average bat good depth?

If Davis, Trumbo or Alvarez go down it just means more at bats for Reimold and Kim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is a DH with a below average bat good depth?

If Davis, Trumbo or Alvarez go down it just means more at bats for Reimold and Kim.

And there is always Walker, Mancini, Urrutia and Dariel Alvarez of which three are currently on the Forty Man Roster, to promote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible that Alvarez goes to 3B, Paredes and Reimold platoon at DH, and Flaherty goes down?

Not if they hide the peyote from Buck.

I'd rather have a black hole in the lineup than in the infield.

Anyway I'm not sure they would keep Janish over Flaherty in that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really believe you should try to keep everyone of value during the season. You never know when you are going to be glad to have them. Look at Steve Pearce a few years ago when we almost lost him.

The question is, does Parades count as someone of value?

I don't see a scenario where he is needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is, does Parades count as someone of value?

I don't see a scenario where he is needed.

Many people thought there was no need for Pearce either that year. He was seen as the "odd man out". Until Hardy comes back, just demote Flaherty or Janish; Janish would be my pick. Play Flaherty at 3B and Manny at SS. If in the middle of one game, Manny gets hurt, you put Flaherty as SS and Alvarez or Parades to 3B to finish the game and call up Janish after the game. Now, when Hardy comes back, we revisit this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many people thought there was no need for Pearce either that year. He was seen as the "odd man out". Until Hardy comes back' date=' just demote Flaherty or Janish; Janish would be my pick. Play Flaherty at 3B and Manny at SS. If in the middle of one game, Manny gets hurt, you put Flaherty as SS and Alvarez or Parades to 3B to finish the game and call up Janish after the game. Now, when Hardy comes back, we revisit this.[/quote']

Pearce was capable of playing defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...