Orioles Talk
Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat
21371 topics in this forum
-
- 42 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 5.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 881 views
-
- 7 replies
- 764 views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 40 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 684 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 67 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 450 views
-
- 9 replies
- 965 views
Orioles News and Information |
|
Daily Organizational Boxscores |
Orioles Prospect Information |
Statistics |
-
Posts
-
By DrinkinWithFermi · Posted
If his away numbers are indicative of what we could expect of him here, then I think it would be unwise to spend the prospect capital it would require to land him, especially when we already have Bradfield on the horizon as a potentially elite glove-first CF. Maybe we could coax more out of Doyle's bat at normal elevation, but if not, he might be best utilized as a short side platoon guy with Bradfield in a year or two. For 2025 though, Harrison Bader would probably give you similar production to non-Coors Doyle and it would only cost money to bring him in, which seems preferable for the Orioles presently since our farm system is not what it was just a year or two ago and the Rockies would undoubtedly want a haul for Doyle and his 5 years of remaining team control. -
The club option does not need to be double. It could be 11m. -
I think the logic I am presenting is too much for you to refute.
-
Both their club option years were basically double their ‘24 salary. The Orioles would need to do the same for Mullins. About $17 million ‘26 option. The only way the Orioles pick that up is if he has an outstanding season. If he were to have that outstanding season, he would be able to get a multiyear contract in free agency. So, the only upside for Mullins would be a free $1 million if he underperforms. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
These 2 sentences should be pinned at the top of this board.
-
