Jump to content

Question about our recent draftees


Recommended Posts

This is mainly geared to the draft gurus out there and those who follow or have followed our recent draftees. Lets say Ruettiger and Coats are asking for the same amount of money, who would you rather sign and why?

The other question I have is who would you rather sign Esposito or say Delmonico and Coats? Who and why?

I have read alot about Delmonico, Coats, and Ruettiger as over-slot picks, who else did we draft that looks over-slot or high upside. I remember reading about the kid we took from a high school in Alabama and a H.S. SS we took from Florida. Do you see any Parker Bridwells, Cam Coffeys, or B. Bundy's in this draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zach Davies (26th, LHP, AZ HS)

Brad Roney (18th, 3B, AL HS)

Ryan Meyer (32nd, RHP, FL HS)

This year's draft is very heavy on the high schoolers, so there's probably lots that I'm missing. These three are guys I have heard a little about and like a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zach Davies (26th, LHP, AZ HS)

Brad Roney (18th, 3B, AL HS)

Ryan Meyer (32nd, RHP, FL HS)

This year's draft is very heavy on the high schoolers, so there's probably lots that I'm missing. These three are guys I have heard a little about and like a bit.

And if I may, I'd like to add a supplemental question that I've been wondering about, but which does not warrant an entire new thread. Who is projected to be the better player--Delmonico or Esposito?

Hopefully we sign at least ONE of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand, both have similar ceilings and some of the same concerns. Esposito is probably a bit safer because of the college vs. high school thing, also probably a bit better with the glove. Delmonico might have a slightly higher ceiling with the bat. Stotle or RVAbird would probably know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand, both have similar ceilings and some of the same concerns. Esposito is probably a bit safer because of the college vs. high school thing, also probably a bit better with the glove. Delmonico might have a slightly higher ceiling with the bat. Stotle or RVAbird would probably know better.

This is about what I have figured, solely from what I've learned on this site. Both seem like the types of players that organizations need to acquire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think Delmonico is better off heading to college and upping his stock. His performance this spring and last summer doesn't warrant $1.5 - 2 million. That said, his ceiling with the bat is probably higher than Esposito's because his deficiencies aren't as deeply engrained. Esposito more likely to have positive defensive value.

Coats > Reutiger by fair amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Ryan Meyer was another over-slot I read a lot about. He looks like a pretty good late round pick. Is Espo. looking for more money then Delmonico? Im not sure what slot is for Espo. Personally there is absolutely no reason we should'nt sign Delmonico, Espo., Coats, and Ruttiger considering what we don't spend on Int. market. Just read the M's signed Victor Sanchez who was the cream of the crop as far as Int. pitching talent this year. The M's do a very good job landing top latin talent. From what little video I have found on Sanchez the kid looks legit. I read he's been on team's radars since he was 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think Delmonico is better off heading to college and upping his stock. His performance this spring and last summer doesn't warrant $1.5 - 2 million. That said, his ceiling with the bat is probably higher than Esposito's because his deficiencies aren't as deeply engrained. Esposito more likely to have positive defensive value.

Coats > Reutiger by fair amount.

Stotle, taking price out of the equation who do you like better Delmonico or Esposito? Delmonico looks like he could develop into a nice power hitting 3B. What kind of ceiling do both players have? If Delmonico didnt have the demands he has would he have been a sup. 1st round type draftee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stotle, taking price out of the equation who do you like better Delmonico or Esposito? Delmonico looks like he could develop into a nice power hitting 3B. What kind of ceiling do both players have? If Delmonico didnt have the demands he has would he have been a sup. 1st round type draftee?

Had Delmonico at #62 on my pref list and Esposito at #75. Approximately 2nd round talents, worth $500-700K. We don't really know what Delmonico can do defensively at 3B yet. There is BP power in the bat that hasn't really manifected in game. Esposito is the better defensive bet at 3B. Delmonico has more time to clean-up his offensive shortcomings. Neither were worthy of Day 1 (1st Rd, Supp-1st) selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had Delmonico at #62 on my pref list and Esposito at #75. Approximately 2nd round talents, worth $500-700K. We don't really know what Delmonico can do defensively at 3B yet. There is BP power in the bat that hasn't really manifected in game. Esposito is the better defensive bet at 3B. Delmonico has more time to clean-up his offensive shortcomings. Neither were worthy of Day 1 (1st Rd, Supp-1st) selection.

Interesting stuff. Thanks fellas. Who knows maybe we luck out and land both Esposito and Delmonico!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff. Thanks fellas. Who knows maybe we luck out and land both Esposito and Delmonico!

Unfortunately with the Orioles, Luck doesn't seem to have anything to do with it. However I agree that we need to inject talent into the organization so we can all hope.

Question for Stotle: How has your organization done this year with signing your overslots? Are there real concerns from the HS kids and a hard cap with the next CBA? I would think some advisors would think long and hard about that, but maybe I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately with the Orioles, Luck doesn't seem to have anything to do with it. However I agree that we need to inject talent into the organization so we can all hope.

Question for Stotle: How has your organization done this year with signing your overslots? Are there real concerns from the HS kids and a hard cap with the next CBA? I would think some advisors would think long and hard about that, but maybe I am wrong.

One "tough" HS target that I understand we REALLY want, but is "50/50" to sign (not in my region). Signed one that was expected to be much tougher. The HS kid from my region that me and my area scout are most interested in will probably be heading to school. So far as I know, CBA not even in consideration for family/advisor.

Generally there are specific player types we'll go overslot for. If you are not in that category, we are not going to listen to your overslot demands. That said, there is a ton of diligence that goes into making sure we aren't wasting an early pick on someone outside of our overslot profile if that player is looking for overslot money. Had one big surprise on that front but resolved itself within about three weeks or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...