Jump to content

Juan Pierre and Joe Blanton O's are going after them


Greg

Recommended Posts

Juan Pierre and Joe Blanton O's are going after them

This would be a desperate, petty, ridiculous decision. I refuse to believe the level of the Orioles' front office has reached the level of stupidity that would warrant any validity to this rumor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Please no to Joe Blanton. He would get absolutely lit up in the AL East. Sporting a near 5.00 ERA with 20 home runs allowed this year. He's essentially Tommy Hunter Part 2.

He strives to be as productive as Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lmao very true.

Going after a Joe Blanton is just admitting the team is to flawed and that the cost would be to much in order to bring in whats necessary to make a meaningful playoff run.

However if Hammel is out any significant amount of time, this might be the right philosophy. I think the primary reason to get Blanton would be allow guys like Matusz, Arrieta, Hunter etc to remain in the minors and do the work they need to in order to be effective. Basically he eats innings, should be relatively cheap to aquire, is a FA at end of year and thus no ties to bind you to him. This allows you to work with the guys you want to and not have to bring up either Matusz or Arrieta. Chen, Blanton, Gonzalez, Tillman and Britton...

Juan Pierre....WHY? Would rather let Avery play day in and day out.

Pierre is having a very good year. He has a .344 OBP, hits .300 and is a good base stealer. He is cheap and a 2 month rental, so he allows Avery to stay in Norfolk and be ready for next year. Blanton has a 7.75 K9, a 1.27 WHIP and 110 IP in 17 GS. should be a solid back of the rotation arm.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we'd essentially be getting what Chavez was supposed to bring us?
Chavez is a career .269 .308 .366 .675 with 72% SB/CS. Pierre's numbers this year are consistent with his career numbers, .296 .345 .363. 708, except his SB is up from 74% to 82% this year. I don't know about anybody else, but for the remainder of the season I wouldn't mind seeing those numbers at leadoff/LF for about 250 K.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally someone speaks up about Pierre.

Currently hitting .307 with a .344 OBP, only 13 K's in 241 AB'S, 20 steals in 23 attempts. In 2010 he stole over 60 bases. Perfect leadoff guy with Nick batting 2nd a left handed hitter to help hide Pierre on 1B from the catcher. Harder for the catcher to throw out Pierre with a left handed hitter batting. Must step left before throwing the ball. Just enough of a delay to allow him to steal successfully. He's a career .296 hitter and only makes $800,000. He a good fielder and can spell AJ once in awhile in CF. He has averaged 3-4 errors a season in his career. AJ has 7-8 usually and 7 already this season in 86 games. Pierre has 1 error in 61 games this season.

Go get him DD. We can platoon him in LF, CF and DH once in awhile and pinch run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the piece and honestly saw nothing except that Rosenthal believes we will be buying something, probably can't get Greinke, and are looking at other options including these two and Vargas. It didn't sound like anything was imminent or even anything beyond the basic discussion stage. I'd be willing to bet they are a part of a group of way more than a dozen players who have been discussed informally...due diligence as Billick would've said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that Blanton would be horrible. But, anyone who is against bringing in a guy like Pierre who's gonna hit .300 get on base at a .350 clip, can steal bases and doesn't strike out while not killing you in the OF, hasn't paid much attention to what the O's have been sticking in the leadoff spot this year. He's essentially the perfect leadoff guy and shouldn't cost much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • His real age will match his baseball age in June.   He could have a role next year assuming Hays doesn't come back.  
    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
    • If they really want to get his bat going, send him to Delmarva!
    • Sounds like the FO believes Norby and Mayo (both righties) need to work more on their defense Holliday and Stowers (both lefties) need to work more on their hitting
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...